Hello all,
Is there any way that i can use 2 content filters? system works for ONE
of the entries below (main.cf).
I have also tried content_filter = scan:127.0.0.1:10025, spamassassin
with no luck (getting mail transport unavailable)
I use clamsmtp for clamav connection.
thanks in advance
B
snip ===
It was not obvious how to turn off html, so I selected UTF-8 option for
gmail...hopefully the e-mail(s) will be more readable.
Stripped configuration still yields:
Jun 11 16:34:12 dns1 postfix/master[3308]: reload configuration /etc/postfix
Jun 11 1
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 1:32 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> dan trainor:
> > Hello, all -
> >
> > I've sent an email through Postfix which has one recipient, which is an
> > alias via alias_maps (mysql lookup table). I've had just a little bit of
> > experience with this type of delivery, but not a
Noel,
Here is what I ended with. I had to add a virtual_alias_maps as the email
address is different the the one we have been sending (and because of the auth
system on this box)
mydestination = $myhostname, localhost.$mydomain, localhost,
hash:/etc/postfix/custom/mydestination
rec
dan trainor:
> Hello, all -
>
> I've sent an email through Postfix which has one recipient, which is an
> alias via alias_maps (mysql lookup table). I've had just a little bit of
> experience with this type of delivery, but not a lot of experience with this
> many final recipients.
>
> Right now
Bingo... That will teach me to not put my quick changes in the top of the
file...
Thanks,
Gary
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On
Behalf Of Noel Jones [njo...@megan.vbhcs.org]
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 12:52
Hello, all -
I've sent an email through Postfix which has one recipient, which is an
alias via alias_maps (mysql lookup table). I've had just a little bit of
experience with this type of delivery, but not a lot of experience with this
many final recipients.
Right now I see the message sitting in
Gary Smith wrote:
Noel,
I created a file /etc/postfix/custom/mydestination and put my entry in there
(hash) and added the following lines to /etc/postfix/main.cf
(only changes made to a stock 2.5.5 config)
mydestination =
$myhostname,localhost.$mydomain,localhost,hash:/etc/postfix/
Noel,
I created a file /etc/postfix/custom/mydestination and put my entry in there
(hash) and added the following lines to /etc/postfix/main.cf
(only changes made to a stock 2.5.5 config)
mydestination =
$myhostname,localhost.$mydomain,localhost,hash:/etc/postfix/custom/mydestination
* Rob Tanner :
> Hi,
>
> This is sort of a two part question. I am running Postfix version 2.2.10
> from RedHat. It¹s current for Enterprise Linux 4. Since vendors often use
> their own numbering schemes, I don¹t know what Postfix version it really is
> in terms of the numbering at postfix.org.
009/6/10 Truth Seeker :
> now to do flushing for a particular domain, i am trying to configure fast
> flush service. in the documentation i found the following line, which i am
> confused.
>
> could anyone explain this further
>
> As mentioned in the introduction, the mail is delivered by connect
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 08:45:34PM +0700, Sthu Pous wrote:
> Do You know a way how I can track an local application/process that called
> postfix to send a messages (on a hacked system)?
The only thing recorded by Postfix is either the SMTP client source IP
address (and optionally the source port
Gary Smith wrote:
Noel,
Thanks for the follow up (and sorry about the top post). So if I understand
the postconf.5 manual, the recipient_delimiter will strip the bounce- off the
email address and deliver it bou...@bounces.domain.tld as the originating email
address instead of bounce-user=th
Noel,
Thanks for the follow up (and sorry about the top post). So if I understand
the postconf.5 manual, the recipient_delimiter will strip the bounce- off the
email address and deliver it bou...@bounces.domain.tld as the originating email
address instead of bounce-user=theirdomain@bounce
Gary Smith wrote:
/etc/postfix/custom/virtual
@bounces.domain.tld bmana...@bounces.domain.tld
Executed:
postmap virtual
postmap -q 'c...@bounces.domain.tld' hash:/etc/postfix/custom/virtual
postmap -q '@bounces.domain.tld' hash:/etc/postfix/custom/virtual
bmana...@bounces.do
I think a better question that I should have asked, is I need all email for a
domain to go to a single address on that box. We are running Cyrus on the
backend is virtual domain mode so the destination account is
bmana...@bounces.domain.tld. This is a dedicated box just for this email. It
is
Rob Tanner:
> Hi,
>
> This is sort of a two part question. I am running Postfix version 2.2.10
> from RedHat. It?s current for Enterprise Linux 4. Since vendors often use
> their own numbering schemes, I don?t know what Postfix version it really is
> in terms of the numbering at postfix.org.
Hi,
This is sort of a two part question. I am running Postfix version 2.2.10
from RedHat. It¹s current for Enterprise Linux 4. Since vendors often use
their own numbering schemes, I don¹t know what Postfix version it really is
in terms of the numbering at postfix.org. Can anyone tell me?
Sec
/etc/postfix/custom/virtual
@bounces.domain.tld bmana...@bounces.domain.tld
Executed:
postmap virtual
postmap -q 'c...@bounces.domain.tld' hash:/etc/postfix/custom/virtual
postmap -q '@bounces.domain.tld' hash:/etc/postfix/custom/virtual
bmana...@bounces.domain.tld
Test with
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 01:34:15PM +0100, Simon Jones wrote:
>
>> Thanks guys, fail2ban looks great - config is being a bitch though but
>> i have anvil working now!
>
> Presumably as an anti-DoS service. It is not an anti-spam feature,
> and should not be used that way. The anti-DoS use-case is
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 04:08:16PM +0200, Simon Schelkshorn wrote:
> Hi,
>
> thanks for your fast reply.
>
> @Truth Seeker: I added the message_size_limit statement to the
> definition in master.cf as I intended to increase the message size
> only for mail sent from my local users and not for
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 01:34:15PM +0100, Simon Jones wrote:
> Thanks guys, fail2ban looks great - config is being a bitch though but
> i have anvil working now!
Presumably as an anti-DoS service. It is not an anti-spam feature,
and should not be used that way. The anti-DoS use-case is to prevent
Hi,
thanks for your fast reply.
@Truth Seeker: I added the message_size_limit statement to the
definition in master.cf as I intended to increase the message size
only for mail sent from my local users and not for all messages.
> > > You can't change the size limit for the SMTP server alone.
>
Thank You for Your time and answer, Magnus:
> That's impossible to say based on these log entries. smtpd(8) and
> cleanup(8) do not by default not log accepted recipients.
>
> Please do not trim logs unless asked to do so.
I think I have discerned them - simply by their
from=<>
and unknown to
Thank You for Your time and answer, Barney:
> As mouss suggested, your query is unclear. I can think of two interpretations:
> 1. "I've set mynetworks=127.0.0.0/8 in main.cf but for some reason
> machines on my LAN can relay mail out to the internet, how do I stop
> this?"
> 2. "I've set mynetwork
Thank You for Your time and answer, Wietse:
> > postconf -d
> >
> > I see mynetworks = 127.0.0.0/8 v.x.y.z/25 192.168.0.0/24
> >
> > from whence it comes? - I have no mynetworks file.
>
> The command "postconf -d" does NOT show main.cf.
Ok, but still how can it be that postconf -n gives me:
K bharathan wrote:
> i get the logs like the following:
>
> Jun 10 15:18:33 relay1 postfix/smtp[9353]: 574501614EC:
> to=mailto:a...@example.com>>, relay=none,
> delay=12531, delays=12501/0.28/30/0, d
> sn=4.4.1, status=deferred (connect to 192.168.20.240[192.168.20.240]
> : Connection timed out)
>
i get the logs like the following:
Jun 10 15:18:33 relay1 postfix/smtp[9353]: 574501614EC: to=,
relay=none, delay=12531, delays=12501/0.28/30/0, d
sn=4.4.1, status=deferred (connect to 192.168.20.240[192.168.20.240]:
Connection timed out)
Jun 10 15:18:33 relay1 postfix/error[9652]: 67FE8161520: t
2009/6/11 Simon Jones :
> 2009/6/10 Ralf Hildebrandt :
>> * Simon Jones :
>>
>>> This is the part I'm missing, how do I enable the shit flinger?
>>
>> You COULD use smtp_source
>>
>> OR
>>
>> your could set ridiculous low limits (1/60s) and then test it manually using
>> telnet.
>>
>> Keep in mind
2009/6/10 Ralf Hildebrandt :
> * Simon Jones :
>
>> This is the part I'm missing, how do I enable the shit flinger?
>
> You COULD use smtp_source
>
> OR
>
> your could set ridiculous low limits (1/60s) and then test it manually using
> telnet.
>
> Keep in mind, though:
> smtpd_client_event_limit_e
On Thu, June 11, 2009 2:13 pm, Stefan Palme said:
> On Thu, 2009-06-11 at 13:54 +0200, Magnus Bäck wrote:
>
> > You're comparing apples and oranges, but I understand what you mean.
> > local_recipient_maps specifies lookup tables that Postfix will consult
> > if the recipient address domain is loc
Stefan Palme:
[ Charset ISO-8859-15 unsupported, converting... ]
> On Thu, 2009-06-11 at 13:54 +0200, Magnus B_ck wrote:
> > On Thu, June 11, 2009 1:03 pm, Stefan Palme said:
> >
> > > local_recipient_maps .vs. smtpd_recipient_restrictions - can
> > > anybody tell me which test happens first on in
On Thu, 2009-06-11 at 13:54 +0200, Magnus Bäck wrote:
> On Thu, June 11, 2009 1:03 pm, Stefan Palme said:
>
> > local_recipient_maps .vs. smtpd_recipient_restrictions - can
> > anybody tell me which test happens first on incoming emails?
>
> You're comparing apples and oranges, but I understand w
Stefan Palme:
> Hi all,
>
> local_recipient_maps .vs. smtpd_recipient_restrictions - can
> anybody tell me which test happens first on incoming emails?
If you don't specify
smtpd_*_restrictions = ... reject_unlisted_recipient ...
(which searches local_recipient_maps, relay_recipient_maps e
On Thu, June 11, 2009 1:03 pm, Stefan Palme said:
> local_recipient_maps .vs. smtpd_recipient_restrictions - can
> anybody tell me which test happens first on incoming emails?
You're comparing apples and oranges, but I understand what you mean.
local_recipient_maps specifies lookup tables that Po
Hi,
In <5f0a4d43797f50decd8590a59d9e6...@localhost>
"Multiple Milters" on Thu, 11 Jun 2009 09:27:11 +0200,
Ihsan Dogan wrote:
> I'm running two spamfilters on two machines, which are accessed with
> milter. In case of an error (eg: the first milter service is not running),
> I would like tha
Thanks - I had seen that online - but made several errors setting it up
(like not setting maxproc to one). having corrected those, I am now
queueing the mail one at a time.
Some strange behaviour however - the wait between deliveries seems to
bear no relation to what I set smtp_connect_timeout to
Hi all,
local_recipient_maps .vs. smtpd_recipient_restrictions - can
anybody tell me which test happens first on incoming emails?
Thanks and regards
-stefan-
Ihsan Dogan:
>
> Hello,^M
> ^M
> I'm running two spamfilters on two machines, which are accessed with^M
> milter. In case of an error (eg: the first milter service is not running),^M
> I would like that Postfix wold use the second one on the other host.^M
> ^M
> I was expecting something something
On 6/11/2009 3:12 AM, K bharathan wrote:
> till yesterday there're no probs; suddenly two of my postfix relays not
> connecting the exchange2003; i cannot ping or telnet from the relays to
> exchange; exchange has got symantec endpoint protection and its
> firewall; what could've gone wrong!
Per t
Truth Seeker schrieb:
>
> Any response for this queries is really appreciated!!!
>
>
> --- On Wed, 6/10/09, Truth Seeker wrote:
>
>> From: Truth Seeker
>> Subject: Spamassasin in Postfix Server
>> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
>> Date: Wednesday, June 10, 2009, 11:54 AM
>>
>>
>> Dear Pros.
>>
Any response for this queries is really appreciated!!!
--- On Wed, 6/10/09, Truth Seeker wrote:
> From: Truth Seeker
> Subject: Spamassasin in Postfix Server
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Date: Wednesday, June 10, 2009, 11:54 AM
>
>
> Dear Pros.
>
> The following is my setup
>
>
> H
> Alternatively, the OP could use a transport map to reroute
> stuck messages to
> the error transport and "bounce" them back to the sender
> with an
> informative message.
>
what is this OP you mean?
how can we do this? may be this is what i am exactly looking for...
ram wrote:
Can I implement smtp_sender_login_maps such a way that
* for selective accountids reject_sender_login_mismatch
* And the for the rest Permit any sender id if authenticated
smtp_sender_login_maps works the other way around (it maps MAIL FROM to
SASL login). What you want involve
Hello,
I'm running two spamfilters on two machines, which are accessed with
milter. In case of an error (eg: the first milter service is not running),
I would like that Postfix wold use the second one on the other host.
I was expecting something something like this:
smtpd_milters = inet:[127.0.0
till yesterday there're no probs; suddenly two of my postfix relays not
connecting the exchange2003; i cannot ping or telnet from the relays to
exchange; exchange has got symantec endpoint protection and its firewall;
what could've gone wrong!
Can I implement smtp_sender_login_maps such a way that
* for selective accountids reject_sender_login_mismatch
* And the for the rest Permit any sender id if authenticated
47 matches
Mail list logo
