On 26-May-2009, at 17:39, Lists wrote:
As part of my mail system I am using postgrey.
When stuff is stopped at the gate (so to speek) i.e. it doesn't even
get into the the system is there a log kept of this?
postgrey logs to the maillog. lines look like this:
May 26 16:27:18 mail postgrey[9
On Wed, 27 May 2009, jan gestre wrote:
> I've a backscatter problem wherein users receives emails from valid
> company addresses but based on content of the message it is obviously
> spam. I'm using postfix 2.5 with virtual domains using mysql + dovecot
> and mailscanner and I've already read
> ht
Hi,
I've a backscatter problem wherein users receives emails from valid
company addresses but based on content of the message it is obviously
spam. I'm using postfix 2.5 with virtual domains using mysql + dovecot
and mailscanner and I've already read
http://www.postfix.org/BACKSCATTER_README.html
Lists wrote:
Hi all,
As part of my mail system I am using postgrey.
I am running Centos 5.2, MailScanner latest version with postfix and
spamassassin
When stuff is stopped at the gate (so to speek) i.e. it doesn't even get
into the the system is there a log kept of this?
I thought it might
(I patched the domain to example.org for this posting)
2009/5/27 Carlos Williams :
> So today I had another user ask me why he is getting an email stating
> the following:
>
> *
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Content-f
On Wed, 27 May 2009, Lists wrote:
> When stuff is stopped at the gate (so to speek) i.e. it doesn't even get
> into the the system is there a log kept of this?
> I thought it might be in the maillog file but i'm not convinced it is.
Give an example. What do you mean by "stopped at the gate"?
Hi all,
As part of my mail system I am using postgrey.
I am running Centos 5.2, MailScanner latest version with postfix and
spamassassin
When stuff is stopped at the gate (so to speek) i.e. it doesn't even get
into the the system is there a log kept of this?
I thought it might be in the mail
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 07:05:36PM -0300, Jose kojima wrote:
> it i have 200 virtual ips, i need do 200 postmulti instaces ?
>
If you have 200 virtual IPs either you are solving the wrong problem,
or Postfix is not your solution. The only use-case for this I can think
of is "snow-shoe" spam oper
Jose kojima:
> it i have 200 virtual ips, i need do 200 postmulti instaces ?
Why do you need different SOURCE ip addresses.
Wietse
it i have 200 virtual ips, i need do 200 postmulti instaces ?
2009/5/26 Victor Duchovni :
> On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 06:17:37PM -0300, Jose kojima wrote:
>
>> hi there,
>>
>> i have a problem here, i there multiply ips in my postfix server:
>>
>> eth0 192.168.1.1
>> eth0:1: 192.168.1.2
>> eth0:2: 1
Rob Tanner a écrit :
> HI,
>
> I use Sophos PureMessage for anti-SPAM/anti-Virus and I’m having an
> issue that I think may be related to when an alias with multiple
> addresses gets exploded (i.e., before or after the message is run
> through the content filter. PureMessage marks all SPAM but it
HI,
I use Sophos PureMessage for anti-SPAM/anti-Virus and I¹m having an issue
that I think may be related to when an alias with multiple addresses gets
exploded (i.e., before or after the message is run through the content
filter. PureMessage marks all SPAM but it does not quarantine messages
com
ok,
ill look, thanks,
2009/5/26 Victor Duchovni :
> On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 06:17:37PM -0300, Jose kojima wrote:
>
>> hi there,
>>
>> i have a problem here, i there multiply ips in my postfix server:
>>
>> eth0 192.168.1.1
>> eth0:1: 192.168.1.2
>> eth0:2: 192.168.1.3
>>
>> i like to send the doma
thanks a lot...
how i can to it with postfix 2.6+ ? there docs about ?
2009/5/26 Brian Evans - Postfix List :
> Jose kojima wrote:
>> hi there,
>>
>> i have a problem here, i there multiply ips in my postfix server:
>>
>> eth0 192.168.1.1
>> eth0:1: 192.168.1.2
>> eth0:2: 192.168.1.3
>>
>> i like
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 06:17:37PM -0300, Jose kojima wrote:
> hi there,
>
> i have a problem here, i there multiply ips in my postfix server:
>
> eth0 192.168.1.1
> eth0:1: 192.168.1.2
> eth0:2: 192.168.1.3
>
> i like to send the domain test.com via 192.168.1.2 source ip, and
> test1.com via 1
Jose kojima wrote:
> hi there,
>
> i have a problem here, i there multiply ips in my postfix server:
>
> eth0 192.168.1.1
> eth0:1: 192.168.1.2
> eth0:2: 192.168.1.3
>
> i like to send the domain test.com via 192.168.1.2 source ip, and
> test1.com via 192.168.1.3. I did read about
> sender_dependen
hi there,
i have a problem here, i there multiply ips in my postfix server:
eth0 192.168.1.1
eth0:1: 192.168.1.2
eth0:2: 192.168.1.3
i like to send the domain test.com via 192.168.1.2 source ip, and
test1.com via 192.168.1.3. I did read about
sender_dependent_relayhost_maps:
sender_dependent_re
Brian Evans - Postfix List a écrit :
> Giuseppe De Nicolo' wrote:
>> Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
>>> What you must understand is that the virutal(8) delivery agent will not
>>> run commands. It simply delivers mail.
>>> Other delivery agents outside of Postfix may or may not use them, but
>>
Magnus Bäck a écrit :
> On Tue, May 26, 2009 9:30 am, Peter Sørensen said:
>
>> I want to be able to change the Mysql hostname in a
>> mysql...cf file like this:
>>
>> user = postfix
>> pass = xxx
>> hosts= mxdb1.xxx.xxx
>> ..
>> ..
>>
>> k
>>
>> CHANGE THE HOSTNAME TO mxdb
On Tuesday, May 26, 2009 at 16:52 CEST,
radu.pas...@tvr.ro wrote:
> Hello, i have a problem with a blackberry. I configured it to work
> with my email server; it works fine, i can receive mails to
> blackberry, i can send mails to yahoo, gmail, etc but i can not send
> mails to my own domain(
Trigve Siver a écrit :
> Hi,
> thanks for reply
>
>> This is suspicious. sendmail doesn't return an error to getmail, so
>> getmail should think the message was processed. in short, there should
>> be no "next round".
>
> As you can see in getmail configuration getmail is calling sendmail. AFAIK
On Tuesday, May 26, 2009 at 17:22 CEST,
Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
[...]
> One last thing I could not find in the manual, maybe I'm blind as usual,
> but does postconf -b|-c|-e require a postfix reload?
"postconf -e" only edits main.cf for you, so you will have to reload
Postfix for all cha
Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
Giuseppe De Nicolo' wrote:
Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
What you must understand is that the virutal(8) delivery agent will not
run commands. It simply delivers mail.
Other delivery agents outside of Postfix may or may not use them, but
they do no
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 07:12:12AM +0100, Steve wrote:
> > This is really lame rate control mechanism. It fails catastrophically
> > when a legitimate site has a spike of email in your direction. Consider
> > generous connection concurrency limits, and avoid rate limits unless
> > they are very ge
Barney Desmond wrote:
> 2009/5/26 Per olof Ljungmark :
>> May 26 08:13:41 terrapin postfix/smtpd[79633]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT
>> from sender.server[1.2.3.4]: 550 5.1.1 : Recipient
>> address rejected: User unknown in relay recipient table;
>> from= to= proto=ESMTP
>> helo=
>>
>> May 26 08:23:06
Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
What you must understand is that the virutal(8) delivery agent will not
run commands. It simply delivers mail.
Other delivery agents outside of Postfix may or may not use them, but
they do not use the Postfix config files by default.
The only delivery agent inc
Giuseppe De Nicolo' wrote:
> Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
>> What you must understand is that the virutal(8) delivery agent will not
>> run commands. It simply delivers mail.
>> Other delivery agents outside of Postfix may or may not use them, but
>> they do not use the Postfix config files b
Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
> The mailman domain MUST NOT be listed in virtual_mailbox_maps.
>
s/virtual_mailbox_maps/virtual_mailbox_domains/
Sorry for my bad typing.
Giuseppe De Nicolo' wrote:
> Hello all,
>
>I am relatively new on postfix, my server atm is on qmail but since
> I had it confgured to use vpomail and its support has been dropped by
> courier I decided to move it to postfix-dovecot with virtual on
> mysql(thats just as background).now to my po
> > For those interested I've updated the packages and you should be able
> > to find:
> > postfix-2.6.0-1.src.rpm and
> > postfix-2.6.0-1.rhel5.x86_64.rpm
>
> Updated to 2.6.1 as I hadn't seen Wietse's 2.6.1 update.
Thanks a bunch, Simon.
--Brian
Hello, i have a problem with a blackberry. I configured it to work
with my email server; it works fine, i can receive mails to
blackberry, i can send mails to yahoo, gmail, etc but i can not send
mails to my own domain(tvr.ro).
When i looked in my logs i noticed the server rejecting the mai
On 26-May-2009, at 02:51, Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
But I think we're wandering away from the original question anyhow?
And
if it is wrong that Postfix responds with "user unknown" when the
directory is unavailable, what SHOULD it be? "Don't know"?
You keep saying that it is Postfix that is r
Hello all,
I am relatively new on postfix, my server atm is on qmail but since
I had it confgured to use vpomail and its support has been dropped by
courier I decided to move it to postfix-dovecot with virtual on
mysql(thats just as background).now to my postfix, I m running it on
slackwar
Nicolas Michel wrote:
Thanks for your help. But that tips is not really what I'm searching
for. The class restriction is a global restriction : some users have
full permission (and can send mail to local and remote users) and some
others have restricts permissions (they can only send to local u
Per olof Ljungmark:
> Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Per olof Ljungmark:
> >> In our view Postfix should not respond with 5xx when it cannot contact
> >> the LDAP servers. This is not a fault with Postfix at all, it is us that
> >
> > What evidence exists that POSTFIX contacts the LDAP server?
>
> May
2009/5/26 Per olof Ljungmark :
> May 26 08:13:41 terrapin postfix/smtpd[79633]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT
> from sender.server[1.2.3.4]: 550 5.1.1 : Recipient
> address rejected: User unknown in relay recipient table;
> from= to= proto=ESMTP
> helo=
>
> May 26 08:23:06 terrapin postfix/smtpd[79805]: NO
Wietse Venema wrote:
> Per olof Ljungmark:
>> In our view Postfix should not respond with 5xx when it cannot contact
>> the LDAP servers. This is not a fault with Postfix at all, it is us that
>
> What evidence exists that POSTFIX contacts the LDAP server?
May 26 12:53:59 thewheel slapd[52495]: c
Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 5/26/2009, Per olof Ljungmark (p...@bsdlabs.com) wrote:
>> And if it is wrong that Postfix responds with "user unknown" when the
>> directory is unavailable, what SHOULD it be? "Don't know"?
>
> You're not listening.
>
> Postfix is not 'responding'... it simply relies o
Peter S?rensen:
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
> Hi,
>
> I want to be able to change the Mysql hostname in a
> mysql...cf file like this:
>
> user = postfix
> pass = xxx
> hosts = mxdb1.xxx.xxx
> ..
> ..
>
> k
>
> CHANGE THE HOSTNAME TO mxdb2.xxx.xxx
>
>
Per olof Ljungmark:
> In our view Postfix should not respond with 5xx when it cannot contact
> the LDAP servers. This is not a fault with Postfix at all, it is us that
What evidence exists that POSTFIX contacts the LDAP server?
What is the Postfix LDAP query for this table?
Wietse
On Tue, May 26, 2009 9:30 am, Peter Sørensen said:
> I want to be able to change the Mysql hostname in a
> mysql...cf file like this:
>
> user = postfix
> pass = xxx
> hosts = mxdb1.xxx.xxx
> ..
> ..
>
> k
>
> CHANGE THE HOSTNAME TO mxdb2.xxx.xxx
>
>
> This is referenced in the m
On Tue, May 26, 2009 9:28 am, Nicolas Michel said:
> Thanks for your help. But that tips is not really what I'm searching
> for. The class restriction is a global restriction : some users have
> full permission (and can send mail to local and remote users) and some
> others have restricts permissi
On 5/26/2009, Trigve Siver (trig...@yahoo.com) wrote:
> Yes but my ISP will accept also big messages and I don't want to
> process messages bigger than 10 MB for instance. Yes the backscatter
> could be problem
Actually, imho, backscatter should not be that big of a problem here...
I don't think I
On 5/26/2009, Per olof Ljungmark (p...@bsdlabs.com) wrote:
> And if it is wrong that Postfix responds with "user unknown" when the
> directory is unavailable, what SHOULD it be? "Don't know"?
You're not listening.
Postfix is not 'responding'... it simply relies on the SYSTEM LIBRARY
function to p
Magnus Bäck wrote:
> On Monday, May 25, 2009 at 23:13 CEST,
> Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
>
>> Magnus Bäck wrote:
>>
May 20 09:59:24 postfix/smtpd[77250]: NOQUEUE: reject:
RCPT from [IP.HERE]: 550 5.1.1 : Recipient
address rejected: User unknown; from= to=
proto=ESMTP helo
Hi,
I want to be able to change the Mysql hostname in a
mysql...cf file like this:
user= postfix
pass= xxx
hosts = mxdb1.xxx.xxx
..
..
k
CHANGE THE HOSTNAME TO mxdb2.xxx.xxx
This is referenced in the main.cf like:
check_sender_access:proxy:mysql:///mys
Thanks for your help. But that tips is not really what I'm searching
for. The class restriction is a global restriction : some users have
full permission (and can send mail to local and remote users) and some
others have restricts permissions (they can only send to local users).
So there are in fac
Hi,
> I'm pretty sure I've seen qmail do exactly this... :-p Some variation
> of its default "accept, then bounce" methodology...
Yes something like this would be great, accept and bounce if message is too big.
> --
> Corey Chandler / KB1JWQ
> Living Legend / Systems Exorcist
> Today's Ex
Hi,
thanks for reply
> This is suspicious. sendmail doesn't return an error to getmail, so
> getmail should think the message was processed. in short, there should
> be no "next round".
As you can see in getmail configuration getmail is calling sendmail. AFAIK if
postfix reject the mail (becaus
49 matches
Mail list logo
