Re: Virtual delivery + procmail

2009-04-29 Thread Wietse Venema
Jordan Tardif: > > On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 04:08:02PM -0700, Jordan Tardif wrote: > > > >> Sorry to bring up such an old thread.. but Im curious as to how this > >> works.. Will it then read the .procmailrc out of the users home directory? > >> How does it get that home directory passed to it so i

Re: Virtual delivery + procmail

2009-04-29 Thread Jordan Tardif
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 04:08:02PM -0700, Jordan Tardif wrote: Sorry to bring up such an old thread.. but Im curious as to how this works.. Will it then read the .procmailrc out of the users home directory? How does it get that home directory passed to it so it knows where to look? Are there an

Re: Virtual delivery + procmail

2009-04-29 Thread Victor Duchovni
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 04:08:02PM -0700, Jordan Tardif wrote: > Sorry to bring up such an old thread.. but Im curious as to how this > works.. Will it then read the .procmailrc out of the users home directory? > How does it get that home directory passed to it so it knows where to look? > Are

Re: Virtual delivery + procmail

2009-04-29 Thread Jordan Tardif
Sorry to bring up such an old thread.. but Im curious as to how this works.. Will it then read the .procmailrc out of the users home directory? How does it get that home directory passed to it so it knows where to look? Are there any detailed docs out there on how to get this working right?

Re: logging

2009-04-29 Thread Noel Jones
mattias wrote: How to get postfix to log eveything iven if i run on both port 26 and 25? I meen If i use port 25 i see all info Etc wich mx pointer the postfix use for sending But if i use port 26 i not see the info Postfix logs everything to syslog regardless of the port it's listening on.

logging

2009-04-29 Thread mattias
How to get postfix to log eveything iven if i run on both port 26 and 25? I meen If i use port 25 i see all info Etc wich mx pointer the postfix use for sending But if i use port 26 i not see the info

Re: Postfix will not use authentication

2009-04-29 Thread Victor Duchovni
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 10:43:19PM +0200, Gregorics Tamas wrote: > Hi, > > I want to set up a relayhost for my local mail server, but for some reason > my postfix will not try to authenticate with the relay server. > > I have these packages installed: > > libsasl2 > libsasl2-2 > libsasl2-module

Postfix will not use authentication

2009-04-29 Thread Gregorics Tamas
Hi, I want to set up a relayhost for my local mail server, but for some reason my postfix will not try to authenticate with the relay server. I have these packages installed: libsasl2 libsasl2-2 libsasl2-modules main.cf relayhost = mail.relay.host smtp_sasl_auth_enable = yes smtp_sasl_security_

Re: Transport Maps Ignored After Upgrade

2009-04-29 Thread Wietse Venema
Eric Cunningham: > I just upgraded to postfix 2.5.5 from 2.3. Now, it seems my previously > working transport maps are ignored as are hosts that are MX'ed to the > machine running postfix. In both cases, email are rejected with "Relay > access denied." Why don't you simply restore the old wor

Re: Transport Maps Ignored After Upgrade

2009-04-29 Thread Brian Evans - Postfix List
Eric Cunningham wrote: > I just upgraded to postfix 2.5.5 from 2.3. Now, it seems my > previously working transport maps are ignored as are hosts that are > MX'ed to the machine running postfix. In both cases, email are > rejected with "Relay access denied." > Sorry, thank you for the clarificati

Re: Transport Maps Ignored After Upgrade

2009-04-29 Thread Eric Cunningham
Sorry, thank you for the clarification, Brian. 'postconf -n' output is now attached. I've already run 'postmap transport' and 'postfix reload' but that didn't help. I did find a quasi-workaround to this by adding the subdomains from transport to relay_domains but that will be clumsy at best

Re: Cleanup timeout?

2009-04-29 Thread David DeFranco
Interesting. You are right that the final result of the virtual_alias_maps ends up being the original address. I really need to talk to my directory team. Thanks! On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 5:36 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: > David DeFranco: >> I have a problem with an "unreasonable virtual_alias_m

Re: Transport Maps Ignored After Upgrade

2009-04-29 Thread Brian Evans - Postfix List
Eric Cunningham wrote: > I just upgraded to postfix 2.5.5 from 2.3. Now, it seems my > previously working transport maps are ignored as are hosts that are > MX'ed to the machine running postfix. In both cases, email are > rejected with "Relay access denied." > > I note in the attached 'postconf -

Transport Maps Ignored After Upgrade

2009-04-29 Thread Eric Cunningham
I just upgraded to postfix 2.5.5 from 2.3. Now, it seems my previously working transport maps are ignored as are hosts that are MX'ed to the machine running postfix. In both cases, email are rejected with "Relay access denied." I note in the attached 'postconf -d' output that transport_maps

Re: Rejection of not authenticated users when FROM and TO matches my domain

2009-04-29 Thread mouss
Ivan Stepaniuk a écrit : > Hi everybody, I have a postfix+sasl+mysql setup. Could someone point out > how to reject mails when both FROM and TO addresses are @mydomain.tld, > and of course only when the sender is not sasl authenticated? > if you are talking about envelope addresses (MAIL FROM and

Rejection of not authenticated users when FROM and TO matches my domain

2009-04-29 Thread Ivan Stepaniuk
Hi everybody, I have a postfix+sasl+mysql setup. Could someone point out how to reject mails when both FROM and TO addresses are @mydomain.tld, and of course only when the sender is not sasl authenticated? I don't have a "smtpd_sender_login_maps" map, and some users would want to send mail with va

Re: block empty subjects in postfix

2009-04-29 Thread James
On 04/29/09 09:41, Мусинов Артем wrote: Good day! You wrote to forum: I added a header_check to reject empty subjects. Please help! How you have done this? I adding to header_checks next: /^Subject:.*<>/ REJECT not valid mail But it doesn't works, it rejecting only mails with subject: "<>" A

Re: delivery temporarily suspended !

2009-04-29 Thread Wietse Venema
Nasser Heidari: > (delivery temporarily suspended: lost connection with > mail.xyz.ab[1.2.3.4] while receiving the initial server greeting) > > What does lost connection with ... while receiving the initial server > greeting) means? Wietse: > Look at tcpdump output. A common cause for this is the

RE: delivery temporarily suspended !

2009-04-29 Thread Nasser Heidari
I use freebsd ipfw as a firewall. -Original Message- From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Wietse Venema Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2009 4:26 PM To: Postfix users Subject: Re: delivery temporarily suspended ! Nasser Heidari: > (delive

Re: Postfix 2.6.0-RC3 and 2.7-20090428 available

2009-04-29 Thread Victor Duchovni
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 08:40:12AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote: > TLS changes since release candidate 2: > == > > The Postfix SMTP client(!) no longer tries to use the obsolete SSLv2 > protocol by default, as this may prevent the use of modern SSL > features. L

Postfix 2.6.0-RC3 and 2.7-20090428 available

2009-04-29 Thread Wietse Venema
Postfix 2.6 stable release candidate 3 is available. If this has no problems, then Postfix 2.6.0 will happen soon. The same code is also available as Postfix 2.7 experimental release 20090428. Wietse TLS changes since release candidate 2: == The Postfi

Re: delivery temporarily suspended !

2009-04-29 Thread Victor Duchovni
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 01:01:36PM +0430, Nasser Heidari wrote: > Hi, > This is Nasser. > I'm running postfix-2.5.5,1 on FreeBSD 7.1-STABLE . > Today I take a look at my graphs and see there are about 1500 Email in > Queue. > Then I run mailq on the server and see lots of messages like this: > >

Re: delivery temporarily suspended !

2009-04-29 Thread Wietse Venema
Nasser Heidari: > (delivery temporarily suspended: lost connection with > mail.xyz.ab[1.2.3.4] while receiving the initial server greeting) > > What does lost connection with ... while receiving the initial server > greeting) means? Look at tcpdump output. A common cause for this is the presence

Re: delivery temporarily suspended !

2009-04-29 Thread Scott Haneda
On Apr 29, 2009, at 1:31 AM, Nasser Heidari wrote: Hi, This is Nasser. I'm running postfix-2.5.5,1 on FreeBSD 7.1-STABLE . Today I take a look at my graphs and see there are about 1500 Email in Queue. Then I run mailq on the server and see lots of messages like this: (delivery temporarily suspe

delivery temporarily suspended !

2009-04-29 Thread Nasser Heidari
Hi, This is Nasser. I'm running postfix-2.5.5,1 on FreeBSD 7.1-STABLE . Today I take a look at my graphs and see there are about 1500 Email in Queue. Then I run mailq on the server and see lots of messages like this: (delivery temporarily suspended: lost connection with mail.xyz.ab[1.2.3.4] while