On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 03:44:04PM +1000, Martin Barry wrote:
> We have an embedded device which is speaking malformed SMTP. We have filed a
> bug with the vendor
Suggestion: find another vendor. This is a not an implementation error or
oversight, this is basic incompetence from under-qualified d
We have an embedded device which is speaking malformed SMTP. We have filed a
bug with the vendor but we would like to see if we can work around it in the
meantime. Is there a way to ignore this or change it to a warning rather
than a failure?
220 smtp.example.com ESMTP Postfix...
HELO embedded.exa
On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 02:54:18AM +0200, Kay Obermueller wrote:
> Apr 6 21:26:52 myserver postfix/smtp[8098]: >
> mail.alice-dsl.de[88.44.60.26]: > kayobermuel...@alice-dsl.de
>
> Apr 6 21:26:52 myserver postfix/smtp[8097]: <
> mail.alice-dsl.de[88.44.60.26]: > 334 Password:
>
> Apr 6 21:2
Le Monday, 6. April 2009 20:00:27 Victor Duchovni, vous avez écrit :
> On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 01:58:36PM -0400, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> > > Or can I get it to use another logon protocol?
> >
> > You can try "LOGIN" if you suppress GSSAPI and NTLM.
> >
> > smtp_sasl_mechanism_filter = !gssapi,
Victor Duchovni a écrit :
> On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 11:42:40PM +0200, mouss wrote:
>
>> with a recent postfix, even better is
>>
>> check_reverse_client_hostname_access pcre:/etc/postfix/logit
>>
>> == logit
>> /(.*)/ Transaction logged: PTR=$1
>>
>> so that you get the PTR as well (eve
On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 11:42:40PM +0200, mouss wrote:
> with a recent postfix, even better is
>
> check_reverse_client_hostname_access pcre:/etc/postfix/logit
>
> == logit
> /(.*)/Transaction logged: PTR=$1
>
> so that you get the PTR as well (even if rdns is "unknwon").
Interes
On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 11:36:32PM +0200, mouss wrote:
> Bryce Nesbitt a ??crit :
> > Sure, I 'm fighting the system. But I'm willing to alter the system
> > also so there is less fighting :-).
> >
> > And there IS a reason to prefer one over the other:
> > neatness in a large aliases file, and
Len Conrad a écrit :
> We have a simple restriction class to which we apply SAV and RAV to a very
> small class of msgs:
>
> some_class =
> check_helo_access pcre:/path/to/4tuple_unfiltered.pcre,
> reject_unverified_sender,
> reject_unverified_recipient,
> check_helo_access pcre:/path/to/4tup
Bryce Nesbitt a écrit :
> Sure, I 'm fighting the system. But I'm willing to alter the system
> also so there is less fighting :-).
>
> And there IS a reason to prefer one over the other:
> neatness in a large aliases file, and clean documentation.
> When things are lined up in columns it is easi
On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 01:58:36PM -0400, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> > Or can I get it to use another logon protocol?
>
> You can try "LOGIN" if you suppress GSSAPI and NTLM.
>
> smtp_sasl_mechanism_filter = !gssapi, !ntlm
Oops, left-out the "static:rest" element:
http://www.postfix.or
On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 07:39:31PM +0200, Kay Obermueller wrote:
> Apr 4 17:57:27 myhost postfix/smtp[4242]: < mail.alice-dsl.de[88.44.60.26]:
> 250-AUTH GSSAPI NTLM LOGIN
> Apr 4 17:57:27 myhost postfix/smtp[4242]: > mail.alice-dsl.de[88.44.60.26]:
> AUTH NTLM TlRMTVNTUAABBwIAAA
Hello everyone,
I try to deliver mail to a server running Exchange. I have Postfix version
2.4.5 under Ubuntu. My Postfix and the opposite Exchange want to use NTLM,
but this fails:
Apr 4 17:57:27 myhost postfix/smtp[4242]: < mail.alice-dsl.de[88.44.60.26]:
250-TLS
Apr 4 17:57:27 myhost post
On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 06:10:34PM +0200, Len Conrad wrote:
> We have a simple restriction class to which we apply SAV and RAV to a very
> small class of msgs:
>
> some_class =
> check_helo_access pcre:/path/to/4tuple_unfiltered.pcre,
> reject_unverified_sender,
> reject_unverified_recipient,
On Fri, 3 Apr 2009 22:54:27 -0400 (EDT)
wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse Venema) wrote:
> Um, that should be the other way around:
Though that will change 'every' sender to be that sender which may not
be correct (virtual hosts, webmail, etc).
http://us.php.net/manual/en/function.mail.php and see e
We have a simple restriction class to which we apply SAV and RAV to a very
small class of msgs:
some_class =
check_helo_access pcre:/path/to/4tuple_unfiltered.pcre,
reject_unverified_sender,
reject_unverified_recipient,
check_helo_access pcre:/path/to/4tuple_filtered.pcre,
permit
The 4tuple
Hello,
I need some help with the following configuration setup:
- I have 4 domains, with several unix-account users. the uses/domains are a
complete mix.
- myhostname: blabla.xs4all.nl =>this is my ISP IP and so my Modem. But mail
addressed to @xs4all should not be delivered to the local machin
16 matches
Mail list logo