W dniu 2009-04-05 04:27, Sahil Tandon pisze:
On Sat, 04 Apr 2009, LuKreme wrote:
On 4-Apr-2009, at 16:02, Noel Jones wrote:
Best in smtpd_data_restrictions so you don't reject sourceforge and
others sender verification probes.
Is there anything I need to be concerned about h
> Chances are you'll need to modify the webmail software so that it
> sends mail via SMTP, then maybe you'll be able to reject it as you
> want to (this will depend on the webmail software setting the right
> sender address).
Hurray, that worked! I was able block an email after changing
SquirrelM
On 4-Apr-2009, at 16:02, Noel Jones wrote:
Best in smtpd_data_restrictions so you don't reject sourceforge and
others sender verification probes.
That didn't go well:
Apr 4 20:15:28 mail postfix/smtpd[16843]: 60D15118AC14: reject: DATA
from english-breakfast.cloud9.net[168.100.1.7]: 554 5
On Sat, 04 Apr 2009, LuKreme wrote:
> On 4-Apr-2009, at 16:02, Noel Jones wrote:
>> Best in smtpd_data_restrictions so you don't reject sourceforge and
>> others sender verification probes.
>
> Is there anything I need to be concerned about having/not having in
> smtpd_data_restrictions? it i
On 4-Apr-2009, at 16:02, Noel Jones wrote:
Best in smtpd_data_restrictions so you don't reject sourceforge and
others sender verification probes.
Is there anything I need to be concerned about having/not having in
smtpd_data_restrictions? it is currently commented out. if I simply
put:
Robert Schetterer wrote:
i was thinking more about a cron cript like this ( surly modified to the
hold issue )
What do mail-daemon messages have to do with junk placed in the HOLD
queue by a milter
Here's a dorky script I use to release mail on hold after a
few days. I have some questionable
2009/4/5 Xn Nooby :
> I am working on a Webmail solution, that uses Squirrelmail, Postfix,
> and Dovecot. I am trying to block email between users, and I don't
> seem to be able to do this.
People seem to ask about this specific scenario a bit (want to stop
users sending mail to each other), I won
Paweł Leśniak wrote:
W dniu 2009-04-04 20:09, LuKreme pisze:
I've seen an increase in backscatter emails recently. Perfectly valid
headers (AFAICT)
Return-Path: <>
...
Not surprising, since the message is sent by a real MTA.
Is there some sort of strategy I can implement that will reject
Victor Duchovni schrieb:
> On Sat, Apr 04, 2009 at 07:01:08PM +0200, Robert Schetterer wrote:
>
>>> Here's my suggestion:
>>>
>>> - Create a second Postfix instance in the same file-system.
>>> - Run a cron job to move (rename(2)) messages from the HOLD queue
>>> of the main instance
W dniu 2009-04-04 20:09, LuKreme pisze:
I've seen an increase in backscatter emails recently. Perfectly valid
headers (AFAICT)
Return-Path: <>
X-Original-To: kr...@kreme.com
Delivered-To: kr...@covisp.net
Received: from mail9.webair.com (mail9.webair.net [74.206.236.69])
by mail.covisp.net
I am working on a Webmail solution, that uses Squirrelmail, Postfix,
and Dovecot. I am trying to block email between users, and I don't
seem to be able to do this.
I was having trouble blocking emails selectively, so now I just trying
to block all emails - to make sure it is working.
In my main.c
I've seen an increase in backscatter emails recently. Perfectly valid
headers (AFAICT)
Return-Path: <>
X-Original-To: kr...@kreme.com
Delivered-To: kr...@covisp.net
Received: from mail9.webair.com (mail9.webair.net [74.206.236.69])
by mail.covisp.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FC10118B5B
On Sat, Apr 04, 2009 at 07:01:08PM +0200, Robert Schetterer wrote:
> > Here's my suggestion:
> >
> > - Create a second Postfix instance in the same file-system.
> > - Run a cron job to move (rename(2)) messages from the HOLD queue
> > of the main instance into the deferred queue of
Victor Duchovni schrieb:
> On Sat, Apr 04, 2009 at 06:16:33PM +0200, Robert Schetterer wrote:
>
>> havening them in hold is a nice option
>> but i am thinking of a script
>> getting them out of hold and store
>> in the filesystem and clean up hold
>
> Here's my suggestion:
>
> - Create a sec
On Sat, Apr 04, 2009 at 06:16:33PM +0200, Robert Schetterer wrote:
> havening them in hold is a nice option
> but i am thinking of a script
> getting them out of hold and store
> in the filesystem and clean up hold
Here's my suggestion:
- Create a second Postfix instance in the same file-sys
nr...@firstfinancial.org:
> Here is the output.
>
> # grep 2ACDFBA /var/log/maillog
> Apr 3 23:32:11 triton postfix/cleanup[7281]: 2ACDFBA:
> message-id=<20090404033211.2acd...@mail.firstfinancial.org>
> Apr 3 23:32:11 triton postfix/bounce[31334]: 96B0EB8: sender non-delivery
> notification: 2A
Hi, the redesign
of the clamav-milter 0.95
does quarantaine in the hold queue
before infected mails were written to some configurable dir
havening them in hold is a nice option
but i am thinking of a script
getting them out of hold and store
in the filesystem and clean up hold
i have some clean
On Sat, 04 Apr 2009, Oguz Yilmaz wrote:
> On my postfix mail server I have RBL definitions at
> smtpd_client_restrictions phase. At the moment 2 of 4 rbl's waiting until
> tcp timeout without an answer when I try with nslookup. This affects my
> clients. Also client programs are waiting for sendin
nr...@firstfinancial.org:
> Thanks for the fast reply.
>
> I fixed the logging issue.
>
> >From the /var/log/maillog
>
> Apr 3 23:32:11 mail postfix/smtp[6451]: 96B0EB8: to=,
> relay=b.mx.mail.yahoo.com[66.196.97.250]:25, delay=0.38,
> delays=0.28/0.01/0.05/0.04, dsn=5.0.0, status=bounced (host
On Friday, April 03, 2009 at 18:50 CEST,
sosogh wrote:
[...]
> [r...@postfix]# more recipient_access.txt
> /special.com/ FILTER smtp:[127.0.0.1]:10026
This regular expression will match not only special.com but also
especial.com, a.special.company.net etc. Consider writing a pr
2009/4/4 :
>
> Apr 3 23:32:11 mail postfix/smtp[6451]: 96B0EB8: to=,
> relay=b.mx.mail.yahoo.com[66.196.97.250]:25, delay=0.38,
> delays=0.28/0.01/0.05/0.04, dsn=5.0.0, status=bounced (host
> b.mx.mail.yahoo.com[66.196.97.250] said: 554 delivery error: dd This user
> doesn't have a yahoo.com acco
Hi,
On my postfix mail server I have RBL definitions at
smtpd_client_restrictions phase. At the moment 2 of 4 rbl's waiting until
tcp timeout without an answer when I try with nslookup. This affects my
clients. Also client programs are waiting for sending e-mail. Is there any
way to put some timeo
22 matches
Mail list logo
