Res wrote:
Hi Terry,
On Fri, 27 Mar 2009, Terry Carmen wrote:
I have an internal requirement to deny access to an email address,
which I'd like to do via access, however, we'd also like to accept
that message for storage somewhere, I was thinking of the access BCC
method, but then I need to
Res wrote:
Hi,
I have an internal requirement to deny access to an email address,
which I'd like to do via access, however, we'd also like to accept
that message for storage somewhere, I was thinking of the access BCC
method, but then I need to also send a 5xx message in their connect
transa
KLaM Postmaster a écrit :
> Is the a readme or other document that that outlines an optimal order
> for smtp_*_restrictions.
>
>
> Sorry, I should have been a little more specific, I am talking about the
> order of the parameters with in a class of restriction (eg.
> smtp_recipient_restrictions),
Steffen Schaumburg a écrit :
>>> The only thing postfix put in my log is the startup:
>>> Mar 27 13:46:40 davserver postfix/postfix-script[24448]: starting the
>>> Postfix mail system
>>> Mar 27 13:46:40 davserver postfix/master[24449]: daemon started --
>> version
>>> 2.5.6, configuration /etc/pos
LuKreme a écrit :
> On 27-Mar-2009, at 09:57, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
>> * LuKreme :
>>> On 26-Mar-2009, at 18:06, Sahil Tandon wrote:
On Thu, 26 Mar 2009, LuKreme wrote:
> I have in my postffix helo checks, perhaps a bad idea,
>
> [some checks up here that reject]
> /^pos
Wietse Venema:
> Jose Perez:
> > Hi:
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 6:05 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > > carconni:
> > >> Hi,
> > >>
> > >> I've been digging around and I haven't been able to find what I'm
> > >> really looking for so I thought I'd go straight to the ones "who know".
> > >>
> > >
Jose Perez:
> Hi:
>
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 6:05 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > carconni:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I've been digging around and I haven't been able to find what I'm
> >> really looking for so I thought I'd go straight to the ones "who know".
> >>
> >> Can Postfix be run in a clustered e
Hi:
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 6:05 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> carconni:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've been digging around and I haven't been able to find what I'm
>> really looking for so I thought I'd go straight to the ones "who know".
>>
>> Can Postfix be run in a clustered environment (ie: multiple servers
On Mar 27, 2009, at 1:32 PM, KLaM Postmaster wrote:
Is the a readme or other document that that outlines an optimal order
for smtp_*_restrictions.
Sorry, I should have been a little more specific, I am talking about
the
order of the parameters with in a class of restriction (eg.
smtp_recip
KLaM Postmaster wrote:
> Is the a readme or other document that that outlines an optimal order
> for smtp_*_restrictions.
>
>
> Sorry, I should have been a little more specific, I am talking about the
> order of the parameters with in a class of restriction (eg.
> smtp_recipient_restrictions), not
KLaM Postmaster wrote:
> Is the a readme or other document that that outlines an optimal order
> for smtp_*_restrictions.
> TIA
> JLA
>
http://www.postfix.org/SMTPD_ACCESS_README.html#lists
Is the a readme or other document that that outlines an optimal order
for smtp_*_restrictions.
Sorry, I should have been a little more specific, I am talking about the
order of the parameters with in a class of restriction (eg.
smtp_recipient_restrictions), not the order of the restriction classe
Is the a readme or other document that that outlines an optimal order
for smtp_*_restrictions.
TIA
JLA
On Mar 27, 2009, at 12:18 PM, LuKreme wrote:
On 27-Mar-2009, at 09:57, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* LuKreme :
On 26-Mar-2009, at 18:06, Sahil Tandon wrote:
On Thu, 26 Mar 2009, LuKreme wrote:
I have in my postffix helo checks, perhaps a bad idea,
[some checks up here that reject]
/^postmaste
Magnus Bäck wrote:
On Thursday, March 26, 2009 at 21:48 CET,
Asai wrote:
From /var/log/maillog, one example of the problem:
Mar 26 11:58:18 triata postfix/smtpd[25357]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
unknown[63.229.177.226]: 554 5.7.1 : Relay access
denied; from= to=
proto=ESMTP helo=
On 27-Mar-2009, at 09:57, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* LuKreme :
On 26-Mar-2009, at 18:06, Sahil Tandon wrote:
On Thu, 26 Mar 2009, LuKreme wrote:
I have in my postffix helo checks, perhaps a bad idea,
[some checks up here that reject]
/^postmaster\@/ OK
/^abuse\@/ OK
Why do these email
On 26-Mar-2009, at 18:23, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
Would anyone else appreciate end of line comments, as an extension to
/etc/aliases and *.pcre? What character should introduce such
comments?
Actually? No. I find end-of-line comments to be far more trouble
than they are worth.
# 20090101
I just thoght that there is a way to pass message to filter right before
passing it to mailbox_command, deliver in my case.
D.
1- if it's ok to filter mail if one of the recipient is local
(eventhough other recipients may belong to other domains), you can use
check_recipient_access:
content_f
* LuKreme :
> On 26-Mar-2009, at 18:06, Sahil Tandon wrote:
>> On Thu, 26 Mar 2009, LuKreme wrote:
>>
>>> I have in my postffix helo checks, perhaps a bad idea,
>>>
>>> [some checks up here that reject]
>>> /^postmaster\@/ OK
>>> /^abuse\@/ OK
>>
>> Why do these email address patterns appear i
On 26-Mar-2009, at 18:06, Sahil Tandon wrote:
On Thu, 26 Mar 2009, LuKreme wrote:
I have in my postffix helo checks, perhaps a bad idea,
[some checks up here that reject]
/^postmaster\@/ OK
/^abuse\@/ OK
Why do these email address patterns appear in a HELO access(5) map?
Because 9 yea
Charles Marcus wrote:
On 3/26/2009, Noel Jones (njo...@megan.vbhcs.org) wrote:
(A better design is to have a separate IP for "official" mail and
another IP used for client internet access. Then client misbehavior
doesn't affect the mail system. of course that means you must have
more than one
Hi Steffen,
The following are links I did use before to create a
postfix.dovecot.mysql system, but on Fedora, but maybe some help.
http://wiki.rbcollins.net/index.php/Postfix_backend_server#Postfix.2BMySQL.2BDovecot.2BSquirrelMail.2BSpamAssassin.2BAmavisd-new.2BClamAV_on_Fedora_Core_5|RB
http://
JohnD wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have been running Postfix 2.5.x on a linux server using virtual
> domains with PostgreSQL for a while now and I've just implemented a
> basic check_sender_access policy using a hash. Everything works fine,
> but now I would like to convert this to an SQL statement and stor
Hi,
I have been running Postfix 2.5.x on a linux server using virtual
domains with PostgreSQL for a while now and I've just implemented a
basic check_sender_access policy using a hash. Everything works fine,
but now I would like to convert this to an SQL statement and store the
data in the databa
>> The only thing postfix put in my log is the startup:
>> Mar 27 13:46:40 davserver postfix/postfix-script[24448]: starting the
>> Postfix mail system
>> Mar 27 13:46:40 davserver postfix/master[24449]: daemon started --
> version
>> 2.5.6, configuration /etc/postfix
>>
>> I know you said non-verb
Steffen Schaumburg wrote:
>> Does a mail sent to stef...@schaumburger.info succeed?
>>
>
> No. I tried from this address (using roundcube webmail which simply says
> "failed") as well as via SMTP on the server itself (ie. SMTP to
> schaumburger.info to send a mail to stef...@schaumburger.info,
Thanks for the quick response and sorry I missed that. Here's the
> output
from postfinger-1.30 without parameters:
--System Parameters--
mail_version = 2.5.6
hostname = davserver
uname = Linux davserver 2.6.28-gentoo-r4 #1 SMP Thu Mar 19 22:24:29
> GMT
2009 i686
Steffen Schaumburg wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Mar 2009 09:10:42 -0400, Brian Evans - Postfix List
> wrote:
>
>> Steffen Schaumburg wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks for the quick response and sorry I missed that. Here's the output
>>> from postfinger-1.30 without parameters:
>>> --System Parameters--
>>> mail
Sorry i got those outputs mixed up and apologies for spamming the list but
I didn't want to mix my replies to different mails all into one mail to
avoid confusion. Anyways here's the correct outputs:
"postmap -q use...@schaumburger.info
mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql_virtual_alias_maps.cf" gives
"stef..
On Fri, 27 Mar 2009 09:10:42 -0400, Brian Evans - Postfix List
wrote:
> Steffen Schaumburg wrote:
>> Thanks for the quick response and sorry I missed that. Here's the output
>> from postfinger-1.30 without parameters:
>> --System Parameters--
>> mail_version = 2.5.6
>> hostname = davserver
>> un
>> dovecot unix - n n - - pipe
>> flags=DRhu user=mail:mail argv=/usr/libexec/dovecot/deliver -f
> ${sender}
>> -d ${recipient}
>
> add in -e just before -d
>
I tried this first, same result.
On Fri, 27 Mar 2009 22:17:01 +1000 (EST), Res wrote:
> On Fri, 27 M
Steffen Schaumburg wrote:
> Thanks for the quick response and sorry I missed that. Here's the output
> from postfinger-1.30 without parameters:
> --System Parameters--
> mail_version = 2.5.6
> hostname = davserver
> uname = Linux davserver 2.6.28-gentoo-r4 #1 SMP Thu Mar 19 22:24:29 GMT
> 2009 i686
Hi Steffen
we use quite a similar config, but instead of mysql:, we use proxy:ldap:
contrasting to your config we have:
virtual_transport = virtual
suomi
Steffen Schaumburg wrote:
Thanks for the quick response and sorry I missed that. Here's the output
from postfinger-1.30 without parameters:
Thanks for the quick response and sorry I missed that. Here's the output
from postfinger-1.30 without parameters:
--System Parameters--
mail_version = 2.5.6
hostname = davserver
uname = Linux davserver 2.6.28-gentoo-r4 #1 SMP Thu Mar 19 22:24:29 GMT
2009 i686 Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.66GHz Genui
On 3/26/2009, Noel Jones (njo...@megan.vbhcs.org) wrote:
> (A better design is to have a separate IP for "official" mail and
> another IP used for client internet access. Then client misbehavior
> doesn't affect the mail system. of course that means you must have
> more than one IP...)
I like th
Hello,
Noel Jones wrote:
> The above is the result of a postfix reject_unverified_recipient check.
> The double_bounce entries you see are address probes. In other words,
> these are not in any way related to your problem.
oook, thanks!
> Since you so far haven't shown anything remotely suspic
Bryce Nesbitt a écrit :
> Noel Jones wrote:
>> You can't pipe to newaliases.
>> You can use a proto file with comments and some script to create the
>> input file that newaliases requires. This seems a natural for a
>> Makefile.
>> -- Noel Jones
> I was aiming for something that was "no mistakes
Ross Tsolakidis a écrit :
>> I had to resort to installing postfix-policyd to rate limit them.
>> (Make sure you have Squirrel use auth so regardless of forged-from
>> lines, you still rate limit accounts).
>
> I've just been playing with postfix-policyd (debian package 1.80).
>
> The only way I
38 matches
Mail list logo
