hello;(after spending 6days of starring at the same
message);
I can't figure this out for the life of me.
I've compiled balsa from source using this
tutorial:
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/svn/xsoft/balsa.html
when building I've decided to use postfix as the mta instead of esmtp.
The
On Wed, 18 Mar 2009, Stacker Hush wrote:
> I'm usign Centos5 and i compile normally postfix with SASL without problem
> (works fine) with this:
> make makefiles CCARGS="-DUSE_SASL_AUTH -DUSE_CYRUS_SASL -I/usr/include/sasl"
> AUXLIBS="-L/usr/lib -lsasl2"
This has the DUSE_CYRUS_SASL flag.
> Now
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 01:12:13AM -0300, Stacker Hush wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I'm usign Centos5 and i compile normally postfix with SASL without problem
> (works fine) with this:
> make makefiles CCARGS="-DUSE_SASL_AUTH -DUSE_CYRUS_SASL -I/usr/include/sasl"
> AUXLIBS="-L/usr/lib -lsasl2"
> Now i'm
Hello.
I'm usign Centos5 and i compile normally postfix with SASL without problem
(works fine) with this:
make makefiles CCARGS="-DUSE_SASL_AUTH -DUSE_CYRUS_SASL -I/usr/include/sasl"
AUXLIBS="-L/usr/lib -lsasl2"
Now i'm trying to compile sasl (for smtp-auth) and TLS. I'm using this:
make makefile
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 10:29:19AM +0900, Alberto Lepe wrote:
> If I understand correctly the Postfix manual,
>
> "reject_sender_login_mismatch"
>
> is equivalent of adding these 2 rules instead:
>
> "reject_unauthenticated_sender_login_mismatch"
> "reject_authenticated_sender_l
Yeah it was the key thing. Had to allow for use of key without a password.
Solved one of my problems at least. Thanks!
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org]
On Behalf Of Barney Desmond
Sent: Monday, March 16, 2009 10:00 PM
To
On Wed, 18 Mar 2009, Alberto Lepe wrote:
> If I understand correctly the Postfix manual,
>
> "reject_sender_login_mismatch"
>
> is equivalent of adding these 2 rules instead:
>
> "reject_unauthenticated_sender_login_mismatch"
> "reject_authenticated_sender_login_mismatch"
>
> r
If I understand correctly the Postfix manual,
"reject_sender_login_mismatch"
is equivalent of adding these 2 rules instead:
"reject_unauthenticated_sender_login_mismatch"
"reject_authenticated_sender_login_mismatch"
right?
If I use SASL authentication, which one is recommended
On 17-Mar-2009, at 17:18, Cedric Zeline wrote:
I need some help. I would like to modify incoming emails.
I need to add a link at top of the incoming mail body, in order to
allow employees that received their email to click on this link and
connect directly to our data base to check the client
On 17-Mar-2009, at 13:45, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
smtpd_sasl_security_options = noplaintext, noanonymous
smtpd_sasl_tls_security_options = noanonymous
As for the PAM part in the sasl authentication, start saslauthd like
this:
saslauthd -a pam -m /path/to/the/socket
path to which socket
On Wed, 18 Mar 2009, Cedric Zeline wrote:
> I need some help. I would like to modify incoming emails.
> I need to add a link at top of the incoming mail body, in order to allow
> employees that received their email to click on this link and connect
> directly to our data base to check the clie
Wietse Venema wrote:
> Chris Dos:
>> relay=mail.chrisdos.com[71.33.251.73]:25, delay=0.19,
>> delays=0.02/0/0.11/0.05, dsn=5.1.1, status=bounced (host
>> mail.chrisdos.com[71.33.251.73] said: 550 5.1.1
>> : Recipient
>> address rejected: User unknown in local recipient table (in reply to RCPT TO
Chris Dos:
> relay=mail.chrisdos.com[71.33.251.73]:25, delay=0.19,
> delays=0.02/0/0.11/0.05, dsn=5.1.1, status=bounced (host
> mail.chrisdos.com[71.33.251.73] said: 550 5.1.1
> : Recipient
> address rejected: User unknown in local recipient table (in reply to RCPT TO
> command))
So VERP works,
Hi all,
I need some help. I would like to modify incoming emails.
I need to add a link at top of the incoming mail body, in order to allow
employees that received their email to click on this link and connect
directly to our data base to check the client's data. I need to add a
link that will
Noel Jones wrote, On 3/15/09 4:26 PM:
Sahil Tandon wrote:
On Sun, 15 Mar 2009, Wietse Venema wrote:
Sahil Tandon:
OpenDNS will not blindly redirect DNS queries that look like DNSBL
requests. Notice the difference:
% dig @resolver1.opendns.com www.abcdefghijklmnop12345.com +short
2
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
> [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Terry Carmen
> Sent: Wednesday, 18 March 2009 6:14 AM
> Cc: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Subject: Re: Dropping rejected mail from a transport server
>
> Chris Cameron wrote:
On Tue, 17 Mar 2009, Stacker Hush wrote:
> How i can change my setup to use TLS?
Please do not top-post or reply off-list.
http://www.postfix.org/TLS_README.html
--
Sahil Tandon
I'm at a loss why this is not working. I'm sending a VERP SMTP e-mail using
the following script:
(
echo "EHLO $(uname -n)"
echo "MAIL FROM: XVERP"
echo "RCPT TO:"
echo "DATA"
echo "From: "
echo "To: "
echo "Subject: Testing VERP"
echo ""
MacShane, Tracy a écrit :
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
>> [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Alberto Lepe
>> Sent: Monday, 16 March 2009 4:18 PM
>> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
>> Subject: Too strict?
>>
>> Hello, and thank you i
+--
| On 2009-03-17 16:45:29, Jeff Bernier wrote:
|
| I'm looking for a good one-stop guide for Postfix. I'm a newbie.
|
| Any suggested reading?
"The Book of Postfix", Hildebrandt, Koetter
http://nostarch.com/postfix.
I'm looking for a good one-stop guide for Postfix. I'm a newbie.
Any suggested reading?
If the exchange server is doing anti-spam analysis, then can't you
setup the exchange server to be a before queue content filter? This
will mean that your postfix server will still do all of the RBL and
recipient checks, but the 5XX series block sent by postfix will be
relayed via postfix to the u
* LuKreme :
> On 17-Mar-2009, at 11:47, Andreas Winkelmann wrote:
>>> On 17-Mar-2009, at 03:49, LuKreme wrote:
>>
I've made sure that /var/run/saslauthd/ is owned by root:postfix (it
was root:mail) and have removed the authdaemon_path line and am
trying again. Hopefully this was it.
On Tuesday, March 17, 2009 at 19:58 CET,
Chris Cameron wrote:
> I have a Postfix server that sits in front of Exchange. Exchange has
> anti-spam software running that will reject what it deems as spam.
> This is creating a problem for Postfix, which accepts a message, and
> tries to send it
Chris Cameron wrote:
I have a Postfix server that sits in front of Exchange. Exchange has
anti-spam software running that will reject what it deems as spam.
This is creating a problem for Postfix, which accepts a message, and
tries to send it to Exchange, who then rejects it. That leaves Postfix
I have a Postfix server that sits in front of Exchange. Exchange has
anti-spam software running that will reject what it deems as spam.
This is creating a problem for Postfix, which accepts a message, and
tries to send it to Exchange, who then rejects it. That leaves Postfix
with an email it has to
On 17-Mar-2009, at 11:47, Andreas Winkelmann wrote:
On 17-Mar-2009, at 03:49, LuKreme wrote:
I've made sure that /var/run/saslauthd/ is owned by root:postfix (it
was root:mail) and have removed the authdaemon_path line and am
trying again. Hopefully this was it.
That wasn't it, and the owner
Victor Duchovni:
> On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 11:37:39AM -0600, LuKreme wrote:
>
> > On 17-Mar-2009, at 03:49, LuKreme wrote:
> >> I've made sure that /var/run/saslauthd/ is owned by root:postfix (it was
> >> root:mail) and have removed the authdaemon_path line and am trying again.
> >> Hopefully t
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 11:37:39AM -0600, LuKreme wrote:
> On 17-Mar-2009, at 03:49, LuKreme wrote:
>> I've made sure that /var/run/saslauthd/ is owned by root:postfix (it was
>> root:mail) and have removed the authdaemon_path line and am trying again.
>> Hopefully this was it.
>
> That wasn't i
> On 17-Mar-2009, at 03:49, LuKreme wrote:
>> I've made sure that /var/run/saslauthd/ is owned by root:postfix (it
>> was root:mail) and have removed the authdaemon_path line and am
>> trying again. Hopefully this was it.
>
> That wasn't it, and the ownership by root:mail shouldn't matter as the
>
On 17-Mar-2009, at 03:49, LuKreme wrote:
I've made sure that /var/run/saslauthd/ is owned by root:postfix (it
was root:mail) and have removed the authdaemon_path line and am
trying again. Hopefully this was it.
That wasn't it, and the ownership by root:mail shouldn't matter as the
postfix
On Tue, March 17, 2009 2:07 pm, Sebastian Chociwski said:
[...]
> Will it be ok to set up :
> virtual_alias_maps=mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql-virtual-alias-maps.cf,mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql-email2email.cf
> ,mysql:/etc/postfix/ANOTHER-EMAIL2EMAIL.cf ??
Yes, this is fine. More or less all Postfix conf
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 03:52:27PM CET, Victor Duchovni
said:
> On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 10:01:53AM -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
>
> > On 3/17/2009 9:43 AM, Erwan David wrote:
> > > You may generate the pcre file with a line
> > > /recipient_([...@_]+)@localdomain/recipient+$...@localdomain
>
On Mar 17, 2009, at 10:26 AM, Eduardo Júnior
wrote:
Hi, all
I read this:
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#smtpd_client_connection_rate_limit
he maximal number of connection attempts any client is allowed to
make to this service per time unit.
What does mean client?
An address IP
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 10:01:53AM -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 3/17/2009 9:43 AM, Erwan David wrote:
> > You may generate the pcre file with a line
> > /recipient_([...@_]+)@localdomain/recipient+$...@localdomain
> >
> > for each valid recipient. This would preserve the validation of
>
2009/3/17 Eduardo Júnior :
>
> Hi, all
>
>
> I read this:
> http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#smtpd_client_connection_rate_limit
>
> he maximal number of connection attempts any client is allowed to make to
> this service per time unit.
>
> What does mean client?
IP address
--
Reinaldo de
Hi, all
I read this:
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#smtpd_client_connection_rate_limit
*he maximal number of connection attempts any client is allowed to make to
this service per time unit.
*
What does mean client?
An address IP? An e-mail address like exam...@example.com? Or what?
It is
On 17-Mar-2009, at 08:01, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 3/17/2009 9:43 AM, Erwan David wrote:
You may generate the pcre file with a line
/recipient_([...@_]+)@localdomain/recipient+$...@localdomain
for each valid recipient. This would preserve the validation of
recipient at RCPT TO stage.
Inte
On 3/17/2009 9:43 AM, Erwan David wrote:
> You may generate the pcre file with a line
> /recipient_([...@_]+)@localdomain/recipient+$...@localdomain
>
> for each valid recipient. This would preserve the validation of
> recipient at RCPT TO stage.
Interesting... and maybe a good candidate for
You are right. I Will fix this.
-Mensagem original-
De: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org]
Em nome de Marcel Straub
Enviada em: terça-feira, 17 de março de 2009 09:45
Para: postfix-users@postfix.org
Assunto: Re: opinion about my configuration - correct
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 12:09:40PM +0100, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
> My fault. I've overlooked that. In your case /usr/local/lib/sasl2 is the
> correct place to store Cyrus SASL config files.
I prefer to not mix application configuration files in the same
directory with system software librarie
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 02:39:08PM CET, Charles Marcus
said:
> On 3/17/2009, LuKreme (krem...@kreme.com) wrote:
> > On 17-Mar-2009, at 07:30, Charles Marcus wrote:
> >> So, is there no way to rewrite the recipient and *then* validate it?
>
> > Sure, but not until after you've accepted the messag
On 17-Mar-2009, at 07:39, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 3/17/2009, LuKreme (krem...@kreme.com) wrote:
It's not like ziggy_test gets delivered to some random user. It's
just that it generates a bounce instead of a reject.
Like I said, this is unacceptable (makes you a backscatter source).
Then yo
On 3/17/2009, LuKreme (krem...@kreme.com) wrote:
> On 17-Mar-2009, at 07:30, Charles Marcus wrote:
>> So, is there no way to rewrite the recipient and *then* validate it?
> Sure, but not until after you've accepted the message.
Ummm... WRONG. Recipient VALIDATION, by DEFINITION, must occur BEFORE
On 17-Mar-2009, at 07:30, Charles Marcus wrote:
So, is there no way to rewrite the recipient and *then* validate it?
Sure, but not until after you've accepted the message.
It's not like ziggy_test gets delivered to some random user. It's
just that it generates a bounce instead of a reject.
On 17-Mar-2009, at 06:29, Stacker Hush wrote:
mynetworks = 127.0.0.0/8, 192.0.0.0/8, 10.0.0.0/8, 172.0.0.0/8
That does not mean what I think you think it means. The only class A
private IP space is 10/8 and 127/8. The others are 192.168/15 and I
think 172.16.0.0/12?
However, even this i
On 3/17/2009, LuKreme (krem...@kreme.com) wrote:
> On 17-Mar-2009, at 06:09, Erwan David wrote:
> > I would fear it breaks recipient validation, accepting mail for eavery
> > address with a _ as valid.
> That is a drawback.
Oh... well, if it does indeed do what Erwan said, it isn't just a
drawbac
On 17-Mar-2009, at 06:09, Erwan David wrote:
I would fear it breaks recipient validation, accepting mail for eavery
address with a _ as valid.
That is a drawback. The other choice is to change the delimiter in
postfix to _ and rewrite it to accept all '+' addresses to '_'. The
trouble is
Thanks for response,
In the meantime I've got emails delivered to vboxes (cleaning up and set up
new main.cf helps)
You have few questions and I am not finish yet so I allow myself to anoy
you a bit more ;)
The reason why I choose mysql is CRM. We use one build for us and I want to
connect mail an
Thanks for the link. I followed those steps and it worked. I wasn't stopping
postfix before I copied the existing queue.
Everything works now.
Thanks again.
- Original Message -
From: "Sahil Tandon"
To:
Sent: Monday, March 16, 2009 11:46 PM
Subject: Re: Relocate queue directory
On Mar 17, 2009, at 8:29 AM, "Stacker Hush"
wrote:
Hello to all.
I'm sending again because the first email was truncated.
Show 'postconf -n' output as Charles suggested.
I want some opinion about the SECURITY of my configuration. It's
safe to
having postfix running with this config?
T
Stacker Hush wrote:
main.cf
===
mynetworks = 127.0.0.0/8, 192.0.0.0/8, 10.0.0.0/8, 172.0.0.0/8
^^
Are you sure, that you want to do this?
At least I suggest
mynetworks = 127.0.0.0/8, 192.168.0.0/16, 10.0.0.0/8, 172.16.0.0/12
Because your declaration includes public networks so that you can
On 17-Mar-2009, at 05:01, Charles Marcus wrote:
(not sure if using the 'or' vertical bar will work as expected here)
It's a PCRE. As long as the PCRE is valid it should work.
--
RTFM replies are great, but please specify exactly which FM to R
Hello to all.
I'm sending again because the first email was truncated.
I want some opinion about the SECURITY of my configuration. It's safe to
having postfix running with this config?
Thanks alot.
Stacker
main.cf
===
mynetworks = 127.0.0.0/8, 192.0.0.0/8, 10.0.0.0/8, 172.0.0.0/8
alias_map
On 3/17/2009, Stacker Hush (stackerh...@gmail.com) wrote:
> I want some opinion about the SECURITY of my configuration. It's safe to
> having postfix running with this config?
>
> Thanks alot.
>
> Stacker
>
> main.cf
> ===
output of postconf -n is preferred...
--
Best regards,
Charles
Hello to all.
I want some opinion about the SECURITY of my configuration. It's safe to
having postfix running with this config?
Thanks alot.
Stacker
main.cf
===
mynetworks = 127.0.0.0/8, 192.0.0.0/8, 10.0.0.0/8, 172.0.0.0/8
alias_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/aliases
alias_database = hash:/etc/
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 12:01:13PM CET, Charles Marcus
said:
> On 3/17/2009 6:47 AM, LuKreme wrote:
> > I rewrite foo_...@example.com to foo+...@example.com
> >
> > virtaul.pcre:
> > /^(.*)_(.*)@example.com$/${1}+$...@example.com
> >
> > virtual_alias_maps =
> > hash:$config_directory/v
Hi,
I setup a Postfix based plateform whith DSN enabled to support "success" NOTIFY
as described below :
1) Mails are forwarded to Cyrus through LMTP ("delivered" action is fixed
since thread "LMTP delivery and DSN action value for "success"")
2) mailboxes on Cyrus are internal addresses, virt
LuKreme wrote:
I rewrite foo_...@example.com to foo+...@example.com
virtaul.pcre:
/^(.*)_(.*)@example.com$/${1}+$...@example.com
virtual_alias_maps =
hash:$config_directory/virtual
pcre:$config_directory/virtual.pcre,
mysql:$config_directory/mysql_virtual_alias_maps.cf
your lin
* LuKreme :
> On 17-Mar-2009, at 03:15, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
>> * LuKreme :
>>> OK, first question is will I be able to setup smtpd.conf so that it
>>> will
>>> support MULTIPLE authentication methods (sql and PAM)? But first, to
>>> get
>>> it working.
>>>
>>> I am running on a custom por
On 3/17/2009 6:47 AM, LuKreme wrote:
> I rewrite foo_...@example.com to foo+...@example.com
>
> virtaul.pcre:
> /^(.*)_(.*)@example.com$/${1}+$...@example.com
>
> virtual_alias_maps =
> hash:$config_directory/virtual
> pcre:$config_directory/virtual.pcre,
> mysql:$config_directory
On 17-Mar-2009, at 04:24, Robert Brooks wrote:
So, what I'd like to do if it's possible, is rewrite f...@bar.example.com
to bar+...@example.com.
I rewrite foo_...@example.com to foo+...@example.com
virtaul.pcre:
/^(.*)_(.*)@example.com$/${1}+$...@example.com
virtual_alias_maps =
hash
Hi,
I've looked at Postfix Address Rewriting doc, but am struggling to see
the best way to do this. We have virtual mail recipients via mysql. Some
of these use + addressing, however not everywhere will accept an email
address with a + in.
So, what I'd like to do if it's possible, is rewrite
On 17-Mar-2009, at 03:15, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
* LuKreme :
OK, first question is will I be able to setup smtpd.conf so that it
will
support MULTIPLE authentication methods (sql and PAM)? But first,
to get
it working.
I am running on a custom port right now to avoid mucking with 587
* LuKreme :
> OK, first question is will I be able to setup smtpd.conf so that it will
> support MULTIPLE authentication methods (sql and PAM)? But first, to get
> it working.
>
> I am running on a custom port right now to avoid mucking with 587 until
> everything is working:
>
> 2525 inet
OK, first question is will I be able to setup smtpd.conf so that it
will support MULTIPLE authentication methods (sql and PAM)? But first,
to get it working.
I am running on a custom port right now to avoid mucking with 587
until everything is working:
2525 inet n - n
66 matches
Mail list logo
