Hi All,
My mail server has due to some reasons queued plenty of mails: -
qshape deferred
T 5 10 20 40 80 160 320 640 1280
1280+
TOTAL 1349 0 2 2 6 5 6 18 23
58 1229
multilinks.com 1342 0
Magnus Bck wrote (on Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 06:54:55AM +0100):
> On Wednesday, January 07, 2009 at 06:46 CET,
> "N. Yaakov Ziskind" wrote:
>
> > On an email gateway (accepting internet email and passing
> > it on to other machines), how do I send one user's email
> > to two different destinati
On Wednesday, January 07, 2009 at 06:46 CET,
"N. Yaakov Ziskind" wrote:
> On an email gateway (accepting internet email and passing
> it on to other machines), how do I send one user's email
> to two different destinations? I tried with aliases, but
> that only appears to work with local del
On an email gateway (accepting internet email and passing
it on to other machines), how do I send one user's email
to two different destinations? I tried with aliases, but
that only appears to work with local delivery.
Thanks!
--- In post...@yahoogroups.com, Victor Duchovni wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 07:07:59PM -0800, Jeff Weinberger wrote:
>
> > According to the master(5) documentation:
> > >do not specify whitespace around the "=". In parameter values,
> > >either avoid whitespace altogether, use commas
On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 09:57 -0500, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 07:58:07PM +0530, ram wrote:
>
> > [r...@50.133 postfix]# postmap -q t...@netcore.co.in cdb:/etc/postfix/vmap
> > r...@netcore.co.in
> > [r...@50.133 postfix]# postmap -q t...@netcore.co.in cdb:/etc/postfix/vmap
>
On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 07:07:59PM -0800, Jeff Weinberger wrote:
> According to the master(5) documentation:
> >do not specify whitespace around the "=". In parameter values,
> >either avoid whitespace altogether, use commas instead of spaces,
> >or consider overrides like "-o name
Hi:
Yet another question I hope I can impose upon your help for...
I am testing sender restrictions and have defined an alternate
submission entry in master.cf for this purpose (and not to disrupt
other users while I test).
I want to test the check_sender_access which requires the form
"
On Jan 6, 2009, at 5:59 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Jeff Weinberger:
I then added the line:
smtpd_sender_login_maps=hash:/path/to/map
to my main.cf and send a few messages. Postfix correctly allowed and
rejected all of the test messaages, and the logs showed the correct
reason for the rejection,
Jeff Weinberger:
> I then added the line:
>
> smtpd_sender_login_maps=hash:/path/to/map
>
> to my main.cf and send a few messages. Postfix correctly allowed and
> rejected all of the test messaages, and the logs showed the correct
> reason for the rejection, and no log entries showing a succe
On Tue Jan 6, 2009 2:42 pm Victor Duchovni wrote:
> I know that it is not a good model for the way postfix requires the
> query,
More stronly, an SQL schema in which multiple data items are stored
concatenated in a single table element is a poor schema regardless
of the application. This violat
Corey Chandler a écrit :
> [snip]
>>>
>> While I've got my postconf output up here, I'm also attempting to have
>> this gateway rewrite all addresses of the form u...@server.example.com
>> to u...@example.com before looking for a match in the transport /
>> relay recipient table. Is there a way to
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
[mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Kenneth Kalmer
Sent: Tuesday, 6 January 2009 11:49 PM
To: Postfix users
Subject: Re: Using Postfix for business continuity
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 3:25 PM, Wietse V
On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 10:20:12PM -, jeff_homeip wrote:
> I know that it is not a good model for the way postfix requires the
> query,
More stronly, an SQL schema in which multiple data items are stored
concatenated in a single table element is a poor schema regardless
of the application. T
--- In post...@yahoogroups.com, Victor Duchovni wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 12:16:00PM -0800, Jeff Weinberger wrote:
>
> > Hi:
> >
> > I would very much appreciate any help, advice, pointers, etc. to
> > resolve an issue I am encountering.
> >
> > I am having a challenge trying to use a mys
On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 12:16:00PM -0800, Jeff Weinberger wrote:
> Hi:
>
> I would very much appreciate any help, advice, pointers, etc. to
> resolve an issue I am encountering.
>
> I am having a challenge trying to use a mysql table for
> smtpd_sender_login_maps. Right now I have:
>
> In m
Hi:
I would very much appreciate any help, advice, pointers, etc. to
resolve an issue I am encountering.
I am having a challenge trying to use a mysql table for
smtpd_sender_login_maps. Right now I have:
In main.cf:
smtpd_sender_login_maps=mysql:/path/to/map.cf
smtpd_sender_restrict
On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 07:58:07PM +0530, ram wrote:
> [r...@50.133 postfix]# postmap -q t...@netcore.co.in cdb:/etc/postfix/vmap
> r...@netcore.co.in
> [r...@50.133 postfix]# postmap -q t...@netcore.co.in cdb:/etc/postfix/vmap
> [r...@50.133 postfix]#
Well, that's not how CDB tables work here, l
On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 06:48 -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> ram:
> > if I use
> >virtual_alias_maps = cdb:/path/mapfile
> > This doesnt work if mails are sent to users in uppercase
>
> Please show evidence of this in the form of SMTP commands and
> Postfix logging.
>
> Wietse
I di
On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 03:25:10PM +0530, ram wrote:
> if I use
>virtual_alias_maps = cdb:/path/mapfile
> This doesnt work if mails are sent to users in uppercase
"This doesn't work" is a very skimpy problem description.
> But if I use
> check_recipient_access cdb:/path/valid_recipient
On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 02:49:21PM +0200, Kenneth Kalmer wrote:
> The way we envisioned it it would be an offsite server acting as a normal
> backup MX, giving the users access to their email through a web interface.
> This would involve reading through the spool files, which for high volumes
> wo
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 3:25 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Kenneth Kalmer:
> > Hi all
> >
> > Just got asked by one our sales guys if we could implement a Postfix
> > business continuity service, by his definition it means that Postfix acts
> as
> > a normal backup MX but gives the users access to th
ram:
> if I use
>virtual_alias_maps = cdb:/path/mapfile
> This doesnt work if mails are sent to users in uppercase
Please show evidence of this in the form of SMTP commands and
Postfix logging.
Wietse
On 1/5/2009, swilting (john.swilt...@wanadoo.fr) wrote:
> i top-post sorry
> i newbie
Ok, but thats no excuse to *continue* to top-post. If you want help in
the future, you should learn how to bottom/in-line post...
> smtpd_client_restrictions = permit_mynetworks , permit
As Noel pointed out -
Magnus Bäck yazmış:
On Tuesday, January 06, 2009 at 10:01 CET,
Tolga wrote:
On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 09:49:36AM +0100, Magnus Bäck wrote:
Arrived where, Mailman? Show logs.
Jan 5 16:51:07 ozses postfix/pipe[22613]: D0E0A352E5: to=, relay=spamassassin, delay=0.77, delays
if I use
virtual_alias_maps = cdb:/path/mapfile
This doesnt work if mails are sent to users in uppercase
But if I use
check_recipient_access cdb:/path/valid_recipients , that works fine
for uupercase as well as lowercase recipients
Is there any setting required to be done to enable uppe
On Tuesday, January 06, 2009 at 10:01 CET,
Tolga wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 09:49:36AM +0100, Magnus Bäck wrote:
>
> > Arrived where, Mailman? Show logs.
>
> Jan 5 16:51:07 ozses postfix/pipe[22613]: D0E0A352E5:
> to=, relay=spamassassin, delay=0.77,
> delays=0.32/0.02/0/0.43,
> d
On Sunday, January 04, 2009 at 21:36 CET,
Nigel Gilbert wrote:
> On 04/01/2009 20:11, "mouss" wrote:
>
> > the question is whether some users may be rejected by the second
> > server. if so, they must also be rejected by the first one.
> >
> > if this is ok, then simply declare the domain
On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 09:49:36AM +0100, Magnus Bäck wrote:
> -UID: 732
> Status: R
> X-Keywords: NonJunk
>
> On Tuesday, January 06, 2009 at 08:54 CET,
> Tolga wrote:
>
> > I tried to create a list, then I sent a request e-mail, and I saw
On Tuesday, January 06, 2009 at 08:54 CET,
Tolga wrote:
> I tried to create a list, then I sent a request e-mail, and I saw in
> the logs that it arrived. But I can't find it anywhere. Where did it
> go?
Arrived where, Mailman? Show logs.
> Also, is this the appropriate list?
That depend
bijayant kumar wrote:
Bijayant Kumar
--- On Tue, 6/1/09, DJ Lucas wrote:
From: DJ Lucas
Subject: Re: Blocking Spam
To: "postfix"
Date: Tuesday, 6 January, 2009, 6:34 AM
bijayant kumar wrote:
Hello list,
Now a days we are getting lots of spam emails from our
own email-ids.
31 matches
Mail list logo
