Simone Felici ha scritto:
Hi to all!
I've tested successfully a simple smtp server with SMTP authenticated.
Now I would like do the following:
My server has two interfaces with IP1 and IP2.
I would like to setup postfix to permit AUTH-SMTP only for sessions
incoming on IP1 and normal SMTP sess
All has been solved!!
/var had 700 permissions. Changing to 755 corrected everything.
On 1 Dec 2008 at 0:45, Bill Cole wrote:
> Daryl wrote:
> > On 30 Nov 2008 at 21:30, Bill Cole wrote:
> >
> >> Daryl wrote:
> >>> Greetings,
> >>> For the second time in a month I have a postfix/sendmail:
> >>> fatal: chdir
> >>> /var/spool/postfix Permission denied error.
> >>> The
On Monday, December 01, 2008 at 03:14 CET,
Adrian Overbury <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is it possible, if I specify a mailbox_command in my main.cf, to pipe
> any output that produces on stdout to somewhere else? Like, say, to
> another command?
Postfix itself won't help you with this, but
Daryl wrote:
On 30 Nov 2008 at 21:30, Bill Cole wrote:
Daryl wrote:
Greetings,
For the second time in a month I have a postfix/sendmail: fatal: chdir
/var/spool/postfix Permission denied error.
There are no possible solutions in my logs, and googling, has found nothing. My permis
I have in master.cf:
#client for sending emails to smtpprox
scan unix - - n - 10 smtp
-o smtp_send_xforward_command=yes
-o disable_mime_output_conversion=yes
-o smtp_generic_maps=
#return interface for the mail filtered through smtpprox
localhost:10026
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 11:13:11PM -0600, Johnson, S wrote:
> Anyone know of any documentation on how to manipulate the incoming
> message queues? I want to intercept inbound messages and process them
> with an external program that I will be writing.
http://www.postfix.org/CONTENT_INSPECTIO
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 06:40:18PM -0500, Dan Langille wrote:
> I tried it like this:
>
> 10.0.0.1:smtps inet n - n - - smtpd
> -o smtpd_sasl_auth_enable=yes
> -o
> smtpd_recipient_restrictions
> =permit_sasl_authenticated,reject_unauth_desti
> -o smtpd_sasl
Anyone know of any documentation on how to manipulate the incoming message
queues? I want to intercept inbound messages and process them with an external
program that I will be writing.
Thanks
Scott
Daryl wrote:
On 30 Nov 2008 at 21:30, Bill Cole wrote:
Daryl wrote:
Greetings,
For the second time in a month I have a postfix/sendmail: fatal: chdir
/var/spool/postfix Permission denied error.
There are no possible solutions in my logs, and googling, has found nothing.
On 30 Nov 2008 at 21:30, Bill Cole wrote:
> Daryl wrote:
> > Greetings,
> > For the second time in a month I have a postfix/sendmail:
> > fatal: chdir
> > /var/spool/postfix Permission denied error.
> > There are no possible solutions in my logs, and googling, has found
> > nothing
Daryl wrote:
Greetings,
For the second time in a month I have a postfix/sendmail: fatal: chdir
/var/spool/postfix Permission denied error.
There are no possible solutions in my logs, and googling, has found nothing. My permissions
for postfix are correct;
#ls -ld /var/spool/postf
Daryl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Greetings,
> For the second time in a month I have a postfix/sendmail: fatal:
> chdir
> /var/spool/postfix Permission denied error.
> There are no possible solutions in my logs, and googling, has found nothing.
> My permissions
> for postfix are
Is it possible, if I specify a mailbox_command in my main.cf, to pipe
any output that produces on stdout to somewhere else? Like, say, to
another command? What I'm trying to do is have procmail write its log
output to stdout, then pipe that into logger so I have it end up in
syslog in a forma
Greetings,
For the second time in a month I have a postfix/sendmail: fatal:
chdir
/var/spool/postfix Permission denied error.
There are no possible solutions in my logs, and googling, has found nothing. My
permissions
for postfix are correct;
#ls -ld /var/spool/postfix
drwxrwx---
john mickler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have one other question about BCP for mailing infrastructure.
>
> In our current setup we have:
>
> INBOUND
> a.mx --
> b.mx mail
> c.mx --
[...]
> So for BCP on mailing infrastructure, is this a good design? Are the
> correct services r
On Nov 30, 2008, at 4:13 PM, mouss wrote:
Dan Langille a écrit :
Following one from John's success, I'm failing. One difference
between
John's setup and mine is my header_checks directive. It was
defined in
master.cf:
-o header_checks=pcre:/usr/local/etc/postfix/obscure_smtp_auth
did
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 3:50 PM, Wietse Venema <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> john mickler:
>> I have one other question about BCP for mailing infrastructure.
>>
>> In our current setup we have:
>>
>> INBOUND
>> a.mx --
>> b.mx mail
>> c.mx --
>>
>> OUTBOUND
>> {local servers} -->
>> rem
Dan Langille a écrit :
> Following one from John's success, I'm failing. One difference between
> John's setup and mine is my header_checks directive. It was defined in
> master.cf:
>
> -o header_checks=pcre:/usr/local/etc/postfix/obscure_smtp_auth
>
did you add that to an smtpd service? see
john mickler wrote:
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 12:18 AM, Victor Duchovni
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It should work if the newline is part of a ${n} sub-pattern match:
# ${3} matches Newline + folding white-space
/^(Received): (.*?)(\n[\t\x20])(.*)$/
${1}: ${2}${3}(my comment)${3}$
john mickler:
> I have one other question about BCP for mailing infrastructure.
>
> In our current setup we have:
>
> INBOUND
> a.mx --
> b.mx mail
> c.mx --
>
> OUTBOUND
> {local servers} -->
> remote-smtp-auth --> smtp --> {INTERNET}
Makes sense to me, but then it's been a whi
I have one other question about BCP for mailing infrastructure.
In our current setup we have:
INBOUND
a.mx --
b.mx mail
c.mx --
OUTBOUND
{local servers} -->
remote-smtp-auth --> smtp --> {INTERNET}
a.mx, b.mx, c.mx do not handle local delivery, they only pass
"acceptable" mail b
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 12:22 PM, mouss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> john mickler a écrit :
>> The pcre example above indeed passes the newline through as mentioned.
>> Here's an adjusted expression to fit my situation, as well as an
>> example header after the replacement:
>>
>> main.cf:
>> heade
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 12:18:45PM -0500, john mickler wrote:
> /^(Received): (.*?)(\n[\t\x20])(.*)$/ REPLACE ${1}: from smtp-auth
> (smtp-auth.mycompany.com [55.55.55.55]${3}${4}
>
>
> resulting replaced header-
>
> Received: from smtp-auth (smtp-auth.mycompany.com [55.55.55.55]
> (usi
john mickler a écrit :
> The pcre example above indeed passes the newline through as mentioned.
> Here's an adjusted expression to fit my situation, as well as an
> example header after the replacement:
>
> main.cf:
> header_checks = /usr/local/etc/postfix/maps/header_checks.pcre
>
> header_chec
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 12:18 AM, Victor Duchovni
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It should work if the newline is part of a ${n} sub-pattern match:
>
># ${3} matches Newline + folding white-space
>/^(Received): (.*?)(\n[\t\x20])(.*)$/
>${1}: ${2}${3}(my comment)${3}${4}
>
> With t
Victor Duchovni:
> On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 10:24:25PM -0600, Noel Jones wrote:
>
> > john mickler wrote:
> > >
> > >As for the newline insertion mentioned on the website, I'm wondering
> > >if using a pcre instead of standard regex would allow this. I'm going
> > >to translate and give it a try.
27 matches
Mail list logo
