Re: cannot find reverse hostname for ip with enormous result

2008-10-12 Thread Aaron Wolfe
On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 7:24 PM, MacShane, Tracy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Aaron Wolfe >> Sent: Saturday, 11 October 2008 5:58 AM >> To: postfix-users@postfix.org >> Subject: cannot find reverse host

SMTP and SASL/TLS problem

2008-10-12 Thread Issac Kelly
I'm having problems with SASL and SSL on SMTP. Here are my logs from a connection request postfix/smtpd[2699]: connect from (outside host) postfix/smtpd[2699]: setting up TLS connection from (outside host) postfix/smtpd[2699]: SSL_accept error from (outside host_: -1 postfix/smtpd[2699]: lost con

RE: cannot find reverse hostname for ip with enormous result

2008-10-12 Thread MacShane, Tracy
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Aaron Wolfe > Sent: Saturday, 11 October 2008 5:58 AM > To: postfix-users@postfix.org > Subject: cannot find reverse hostname for ip with enormous result > > Hello, > > We use reject_unknown_client to

Re: envelope_sender VS header_sender

2008-10-12 Thread Byung-Hee HWANG
On Sun, 2008-10-12 at 20:39 +0200, mouss wrote: > Byung-Hee HWANG a crit : > > [snip] > > your example is good and cool to me ;; and more, here this message's > > envelope_sender(RFC2822's Sender) > > envelope sender is governed by RFC[2]821 (smtp), not RFC[2]822 (format > of messages, including t

Re: envelope_sender VS header_sender

2008-10-12 Thread mouss
Byung-Hee HWANG a écrit : > [snip] > your example is good and cool to me ;; and more, here this message's > envelope_sender(RFC2822's Sender) envelope sender is governed by RFC[2]821 (smtp), not RFC[2]822 (format of messages, including the headers). These RFCs have been obsoleted by the new versi

Re: envelope_sender VS header_sender

2008-10-12 Thread Byung-Hee HWANG
(first, i want to send "big thank you!" for Vitor, mouss, Wietse ;;) On Sun, 2008-10-12 at 12:28 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote: > Byung-Hee HWANG: > > i saw some terms "envelope _sender" and "header_sender" in postfix docs > > on public postfix website. it is so confused to me. what is different > >

Re: [solved] Disabling global content_filter with an empty filter specified with an access table

2008-10-12 Thread Diego Liziero
On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 6:28 PM, Wietse Venema <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > As documented, comments are used at the start of a line. On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 6:29 PM, mouss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [..] > the syntax of lines is explained at the beginning of the postconf man > page. this page

Re: [solved] Disabling global content_filter with an empty filter specified with an access table

2008-10-12 Thread Wietse Venema
Diego Liziero: > I found that I used them in mynetworks: > > mynetworks =127.0.0.1, # localhost > 192.168.1.1, # relay > 172.16.1.1,# fax server > ... > and so on, and it _seems_ to really work correctly, (apart from the > command postconf that shows m

Re: [solved] Disabling global content_filter with an empty filter specified with an access table

2008-10-12 Thread mouss
Diego Liziero a écrit : > On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 9:59 PM, mouss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Diego Liziero a écrit : >> >>> On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 9:27 PM, Brian Evans - Postfix List >>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> In-line comments are not supported in main.cf or master.

Re: envelope_sender VS header_sender

2008-10-12 Thread Wietse Venema
Byung-Hee HWANG: > i saw some terms "envelope _sender" and "header_sender" in postfix docs > on public postfix website. it is so confused to me. what is different > between "envelope_sender" and "header_sender"? according to RFC 2822, > there is described about "Sender" and "From". is the terms > (

Re: envelope_sender VS header_sender

2008-10-12 Thread mouss
Byung-Hee HWANG a écrit : > i saw some terms "envelope _sender" and "header_sender" in postfix docs > on public postfix website. it is so confused to me. what is different > between "envelope_sender" and "header_sender"? according to RFC 2822, > there is described about "Sender" and "From". is the

Re: [solved] Disabling global content_filter with an empty filter specified with an access table

2008-10-12 Thread Diego Liziero
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 9:59 PM, mouss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Diego Liziero a écrit : >> On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 9:27 PM, Brian Evans - Postfix List >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> In-line comments are not supported in main.cf or master.cf. Recommend >>> removing # <-- if you really do

Re: envelope_sender VS header_sender

2008-10-12 Thread Victor Duchovni
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 12:54:37AM +0900, Byung-Hee HWANG wrote: > i saw some terms "envelope _sender" and "header_sender" in postfix docs > on public postfix website. it is so confused to me. what is different > between "envelope_sender" and "header_sender"? according to RFC 2822, > there is desc

Re: Postfix automatic startup script for Mac OSX 10.4

2008-10-12 Thread Dan Langille
Rupert Reid wrote: Hello all, I am trying to setup postfix so that it will start automatically at startup. I placed the following script "postfix" in a text file "postfix" and saved it to Library/Startupitems/Postfix. As you probably guessed it did not work. I would be grateful for some det

envelope_sender VS header_sender

2008-10-12 Thread Byung-Hee HWANG
i saw some terms "envelope _sender" and "header_sender" in postfix docs on public postfix website. it is so confused to me. what is different between "envelope_sender" and "header_sender"? according to RFC 2822, there is described about "Sender" and "From". is the terms (envelope_sender, header_sen

Re: Postfix automatic startup script for Mac OSX 10.4

2008-10-12 Thread Victor Duchovni
On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 09:31:50AM -0600, James Lay wrote: > > "http://www.apple.com/DTDs/PropertyList-1.0.dtd";> > > > Label > org.postfix.master > OnDemand > > Program > /usr/libexec/postfix/master > ProgramArguments > > master > > QueueDire

Re: Postfix automatic startup script for Mac OSX 10.4

2008-10-12 Thread James Lay
On 10/12/08 9:07 AM, "Rupert Reid" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello all, > > I am trying to setup postfix so that it will start automatically at > startup. I placed the following script "postfix" in a text file > "postfix" and saved it to Library/Startupitems/Postfix. As you > probably gues

Postfix automatic startup script for Mac OSX 10.4

2008-10-12 Thread Rupert Reid
Hello all, I am trying to setup postfix so that it will start automatically at startup. I placed the following script "postfix" in a text file "postfix" and saved it to Library/Startupitems/Postfix. As you probably guessed it did not work. I would be grateful for some detailed instructi

Re: About steps to setup virtual mailbox domain class

2008-10-12 Thread mouss
Stephen Liu a écrit : > # postmap -q [EMAIL PROTECTED] > mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql-virtual_forwardings.cf > postmap: warning: mysql query failed: Unknown column 'destination' in > 'field list' > do you understand this? > [snip] > # cat /etc/postfix/mysql-virtual_forwardings.cf > user = mail_adm

Re: About steps to setup virtual mailbox domain class

2008-10-12 Thread Stephen Liu
--- mouss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Stephen Liu a écrit : > > - > > > > Oct 12 08:30:39 xen6 postfix/proxymap[1656]: warning: mysql query > > failed: Unknown column 'destination' in 'field list' > > Oct 12 08:30:39 xen6 postfix/cleanup[1655]: warning: 2D6803D810: > > virtual_alias_maps map loo

Re: About steps to setup virtual mailbox domain class

2008-10-12 Thread mouss
Stephen Liu a écrit : > - > > Oct 12 08:30:39 xen6 postfix/proxymap[1656]: warning: mysql query > failed: Unknown column 'destination' in 'field list' > Oct 12 08:30:39 xen6 postfix/cleanup[1655]: warning: 2D6803D810: > virtual_alias_maps map lookup problem for [EMAIL PROTECTED] > one of your v

Re: About steps to setup virtual mailbox domain class

2008-10-12 Thread Stephen Liu
--- mouss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Stephen Liu a écrit : > > [snip] > > > > Sorry I don't have "mysql-virtual-mailbox-maps.cf" here. > > > > - do 'postfix reload' > - do a test and see if it still fails > - after that, sow output of 'postconf -n' reload postfix 1) telnet localhost 2