Uwe Dippel a écrit :
> mouss wrote:
>
>> or use Perl.
>>
>> use MIME::Lite;
>>
>> my $msg = MIME::Lite->new(
>> From=> '[EMAIL PROTECTED]',
>> To => '[EMAIL PROTECTED]',
>> Cc => '[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]',
>> Subject => 'blah blah',
>> Type=> 'mult
--- mouss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> Debian Etch
> >>> Postfix 2.3.8
> >>> Dovcot
- snip -
> >>> On /etc/postfix/mysql-virtual-mailbox-maps.cf
> >>> user = mailuser
> >>> password = mailuserpasswd
> >>> hosts = 127.0.0.1
> >>> dbname = mailserver
> >>> query = SELECT 1 FROM view_users WH
Postfix's proxmap is segfaulting or at least that's what I think the signal
11 means. Some background info first: This is a fedora mail server (core 6)
that I've upgraded to postfix 2.5.4. I used the rpm spec file from the last
release of postfix on fc6 to build a rpm to upgrade with and also to
Uwe Dippel wrote:
> Aside of hacks, I *think* that it might make sense to have a non-hacked
> solution. As system administrators, we, at least I, send quite a number
> of items with mail (cronjobs).
> Therefore, IMHVHO, a tool distributed with *nix or *fix (wrapping around
> mail) might be useful?
How to implement logic like below in one HASH map?
pcre:/etc/postfix/maps/check_client:
/mail\.ru/ DUNNO
/yandex\.ru/ DUNNO
/.*/ goto_check_class
Thanks.
mouss wrote:
or use Perl.
use MIME::Lite;
my $msg = MIME::Lite->new(
From=> '[EMAIL PROTECTED]',
To => '[EMAIL PROTECTED]',
Cc => '[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]',
Subject => 'blah blah',
Type=> 'multipart/mixed'
);
$msg->attach(
Type => 'TE
Victor Duchovni a écrit :
> On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 03:45:04PM -0400, James wrote:
>
>
>> http://www.unix.com/how-do-i-send-email/
>>
>
> I would download mpack(1)/munpack(1) from CMU. The code is old and
> one needs to remove a couple of spurious declarations of malloc() on
> some systems.
On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 03:45:04PM -0400, James wrote:
> http://www.unix.com/how-do-i-send-email/
I would download mpack(1)/munpack(1) from CMU. The code is old and
one needs to remove a couple of spurious declarations of malloc() on
some systems.
With mpack it is easy to send MIME encoded attac
On Thu, October 9, 2008 3:40 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello,
> I'm currently sending 2 daily emails to my group at work using crontab
> and the '/usr/lib/sendmail' command on a server running postfix 2.5.1. Is
> there any way to add an attachment, in this case a excel spreadsheet? I've
> had
Hello,
I'm currently sending 2 daily emails to my group at work using crontab
and the '/usr/lib/sendmail' command on a server running postfix 2.5.1.
Is there any way to add an attachment, in this case a excel spreadsheet?
I've had people tell me to use mutt but I'm having trouble changing the
'fr
Joey:
> When I execute the following ps command utilizing the wide display this is
> what I get
>
> 9550 ?S 0:00 smtpd -n smtp -t inet -u -o stress
In your case, the command line can't tell you which it is. Instead,
look for the warning message in the maillog file. See STRESS_READM
> -Original Message-
> From: Wietse Venema [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2008 1:37 PM
> To: Joey
> Cc: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Subject: Re: System stressed
>
> Joey:
> > > Does it say "-o stress=" OR "-o stress=yes"?
> > > The former means it has support but n
On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 01:37:17PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> "-o stress" means that the top command truncated the text. Use a wider
> window or use "ps -w".
This is system dependent. The command-line option processing code in
single_server_main() modifies "optarg" as a side-effect of split_at
Joey:
> > Does it say "-o stress=" OR "-o stress=yes"?
> > The former means it has support but not using, the latter is USING.
>
> In TOP it says "smtpd -n smtp -t inet -u -o stress"
> I just really want to know what this means, is the system under stress or not?
> I'm not seeing delays or experien
> Subject: Re: System stressed
>
> Joey wrote:
> >
> > Hello All,
> >
> > I’m trying to understand this a little better. I read
> > http://www.postfix.org/STRESS_README.html and have an ok idea about
> > whats happening.
> >
> > I see several of these when watching top.
> >
> > smtpd -n smtp -t i
[Reply-To set because this has become rather offtopic]
Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 06:34:23PM -0400, Bill Cole wrote:
Actually, there has long been a mechanism *in principle* for a
multipart/alternative object to contain parts that differ by language, as
described original
Hi again,
I've upgraded to Debian Lenny's package:
# postconf mail_version
mail_version = 2.5.5
and the problem has dissapear :S
Regards,
--
Alvaro Marín Illera
Hostalia Internet
www.hostalia.com
Hi,
>> 127.0.0.1 is configured on lo, as normaly.
>> I've tried with all interfaces because I haven't results with lo.
>
> Quite odd indeed. I just did the same command on 2 of my mail filters and
> got plenty of traffic related to sqlgrey and my antivirus.
>
> What OS are you running?
# cat /
* Brian Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > 127.0.0.1 is configured on lo, as normaly.
> > I've tried with all interfaces because I haven't results with lo.
>
> Quite odd indeed. I just did the same command on 2 of my mail filters and
> got plenty of traffic related to sqlgrey and my antivirus.
>
> 127.0.0.1 is configured on lo, as normaly.
> I've tried with all interfaces because I haven't results with lo.
Quite odd indeed. I just did the same command on 2 of my mail filters and
got plenty of traffic related to sqlgrey and my antivirus.
What OS are you running?
--Brian
> You can use the "ifconfig" command to find out which interface is 127.0.0.1.
127.0.0.1 is configured on lo, as normaly.
I've tried with all interfaces because I haven't results with lo.
I've enabled debug_peer_list and this is the result:
Oct 9 16:47:20 mailserver postfix/smtpd[9638]: connect
On Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 06:34:23PM -0400, Bill Cole wrote:
> Actually, there has long been a mechanism *in principle* for a
> multipart/alternative object to contain parts that differ by language, as
> described originally in RFC1766 and now in less detail by its successor
> RFC3282. I am not a
Joey wrote:
>
> Hello All,
>
>
>
> I’m trying to understand this a little better. I read
> http://www.postfix.org/STRESS_README.html and have an ok idea about
> whats happening.
>
>
>
> I see several of these when watching top.
>
> smtpd -n smtp -t inet -u -o stress
>
>
>
> I can tell you w
Thomas Ackermann:
> Hello,
> i am running postfix 2.4.5 on a OpenSuse 10.3 Linux server.
>
> I think, i have done everything right to chroot most postfix service.
>
> But i cannot proove or even see this!
>
>
> My main.cf contains the following:
>
>
> smtpsinet n
Hello,
i am running postfix 2.4.5 on a OpenSuse 10.3 Linux server.
I think, i have done everything right to chroot most postfix service.
But i cannot proove or even see this!
My main.cf contains the following:
smtpsinet n - y - - smt
Alvaro Mar?n:
> Wietse Venema escribi?:
> > Alvaro Mar?n:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> I've these messages in logs:
> >>
> >> Oct 9 12:33:41 mailserver postfix/smtpd[3198]: connect from
> >> localhost[127.0.0.1]
> >> Oct 9 12:33:41 mailserver postfix/smtpd[3198]: lost connection after
> >> CONNECT from
* Alvaro Marín <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Then you made a mistake.
> >
> > What command did you use?
> >
> > Wietse
>
> tcpdump -n -i eth0 port 25 and host 127.0.0.1
127.0.0.1 is NOT on eth0
> tcpdump -n -i eth1 port 25 and host 127.0.0.1
127.0.0.1 is NOT on eth1, either
> tcpdump -n -i
Wietse Venema escribió:
> Alvaro Mar?n:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I've these messages in logs:
>>
>> Oct 9 12:33:41 mailserver postfix/smtpd[3198]: connect from
>> localhost[127.0.0.1]
>> Oct 9 12:33:41 mailserver postfix/smtpd[3198]: lost connection after
>> CONNECT from localhost[127.0.0.1]
> ...
>> If I
Wietse Venema schrieb:
> Alvaro Mar?n:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I've these messages in logs:
>>
>> Oct 9 12:33:41 mailserver postfix/smtpd[3198]: connect from
>> localhost[127.0.0.1]
>> Oct 9 12:33:41 mailserver postfix/smtpd[3198]: lost connection after
>> CONNECT from localhost[127.0.0.1]
> ...
>> If I
Alvaro Mar?n:
> Hello,
>
> I've these messages in logs:
>
> Oct 9 12:33:41 mailserver postfix/smtpd[3198]: connect from
> localhost[127.0.0.1]
> Oct 9 12:33:41 mailserver postfix/smtpd[3198]: lost connection after
> CONNECT from localhost[127.0.0.1]
...
> If I use tcpdump to see what is happeni
Hello,
I've these messages in logs:
Oct 9 12:33:41 mailserver postfix/smtpd[3198]: connect from
localhost[127.0.0.1]
Oct 9 12:33:41 mailserver postfix/smtpd[3198]: lost connection after
CONNECT from localhost[127.0.0.1]
Oct 9 12:33:41 mailserver postfix/smtpd[3198]: disconnect from
localhost[1
* Joey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I see several of these when watching top.
>
> smtpd -n smtp -t inet -u -o stress
If Postfix was operating in stress mode, you would see "-o
stress=yes".
Ciao
Stefan
--
Stefan Förster http://www.incertum.net/ Public Key: 0xBBE2A9E9
25 Zeichen, daß Du
Hello All,
I'm trying to understand this a little better. I read
http://www.postfix.org/STRESS_README.html and have an ok idea about whats
happening.
I see several of these when watching top.
smtpd -n smtp -t inet -u -o stress
I can tell you we get about 10K messages an hour on aver
Stephen Liu wrote:
--- mouss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Stephen Liu wrote:
Hi folks,
Debian Etch
Postfix 2.3.8
Dovcot
I'm learning to setup "virtual mailbox domain class". Please shed
me
some light on its setup;
[snip]
On /etc/postfix/mysql-virtual-mailbox-maps.cf
user = mailuser
pas
34 matches
Mail list logo
