Hi!
If I have in my master.cf:
slow unix - - n - - smtp
in my transport:
ex.domain slow:
and
main.cf:
slow_destination_rate_delay = 5s
Will this mean
- my Postfix server will have a 5 sec. delay after sending an email
(this was the obvious thing I can monito
Adam McCarthy wrote:
Well as far as I know SMTP is not blocked. I wanted to go through my
ISP's server to begin with, because places such as GMail didn't like
me. Yet everyone seems to love my ISP's server.
I had relayhost set to my ISP, but I musta had something wrong,
because some people would
You are right my posts are sometimes poorly written usually by the time i get
around to posting it is 4am and i have been staring at the screen for days on
end.
Not really conducive to descriptive English but sometime i just have to get it
out before i die heehee.
PS Can't count the amount
Also, have a look here:
http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html
Adam McCarthy wrote:
Well as far as I know SMTP is not blocked. I wanted to go through my
ISP's server to begin with, because places such as GMail didn't like
me. Yet everyone seems to love my ISP's server.
I had relayhost set t
Send us the output of postconf -n from your smtp server. If your logs
didn't indicate the mail was rejected it could have been silently
discarded by spam filters or something of the like.
Adam McCarthy wrote:
Well as far as I know SMTP is not blocked. I wanted to go through my
ISP's server to
I would not point the MX record for your dynamic domain name (or any
other domain name) at your ISP's server. The mail will almost certainly
be rejected.
Adam McCarthy wrote:
So would I just tell no-ip.org (seperate from DynDNS as fair as I
know, but they also have MX records.), to just put i
Well as far as I know SMTP is not blocked. I wanted to go through my
ISP's server to begin with, because places such as GMail didn't like
me. Yet everyone seems to love my ISP's server.
I had relayhost set to my ISP, but I musta had something wrong,
because some people would get replies, while oth
So would I just tell no-ip.org (seperate from DynDNS as fair as I
know, but they also have MX records.), to just put in my address or
would I just throw in my ISP's SMTP server?
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 4:12 PM, J.P. Trosclair
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think DynDNS.com (the folks who have no-i
I think DynDNS.com (the folks who have no-ip.org right?) have an option
to setup a MX record for dynamic host names. You'll more than likely
want to enable this unless you have a reason not to.
Basic setup for accepting and sending mail with your ddns hostname:
mydomain = mymachine.no-ip.org
m
Test wrote:
Ok, small clarification:
Postfix delivers to cyrus-imapd via lmtp
I want to deliver the same messages to another imap server (Zarafa) for
testing purposes...
I can off course configure postfix to deliver to another lmtp target,
but i want to deliver to the both...
Postfix deliv
I have looked for a guide on the Internet on how to do this but I have
never found one.
I am wishing to run a request tracker (RT) and need postfix.
Now I already have the email coming in, sent to RT by fetch mail of a
gmail account.
Now how can I make it so that postfix sends replies and other
Ok, small clarification:
Postfix delivers to cyrus-imapd via lmtp
I want to deliver the same messages to another imap server (Zarafa) for
testing purposes...
I can off course configure postfix to deliver to another lmtp target,
but i want to deliver to the both...
--
Test <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Victor Duchovni wrote:
| On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 11:31:58AM -0500, Jay Deiman wrote:
|
|> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
|> Hash: SHA1
|>
|> I'm wondering if there is a release schedule available somewhere. I
|> poked around on postfix.org withou
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 11:31:58AM -0500, Jay Deiman wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I'm wondering if there is a release schedule available somewhere. I
> poked around on postfix.org without really finding anything.
>
> Specifically, I'm wondering if anyone has any
I have hacked pflogsumm so that it could be read log from database used
by PHP-syslog-ng.
If someone is interested, I will make it public.
rocsca
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-postfix-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rocco Scappatura
> Sent: Friday, Septem
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm wondering if there is a release schedule available somewhere. I
poked around on postfix.org without really finding anything.
Specifically, I'm wondering if anyone has any sort of approximate
release date for a 2.6 stable? I've played around wit
Test wrote:
Is it possible to have postfix deliver mail to 2 mda's at the same time ?
please explain your problem more clearly. postfix can deliver via:
- smtp
- lmtp
- pipe (exec a command)
it can deliver to as many smtp/lmtp servers and as many MDAs as you want.
ie. 1 imap server on box 1
Test wrote:
> Is it possible to have postfix deliver mail to 2 mda's at the same time ?
>
> ie. 1 imap server on box 1 and another imapserver on box 2 ?
>
> thnx
>
Personally, I would setup a second Postfix instance on the "box 2" as an
internal only machine and then put a virtual_alias_maps, on
Is it possible to have postfix deliver mail to 2 mda's at the same time ?
ie. 1 imap server on box 1 and another imapserver on box 2 ?
thnx
--
Test <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Maple wrote:
HostA is:
internal mailhost,
CNAME of ns.example.com and
a fresh install of:
Fedora Core 8
Firestarter w open ports 53, 80, closed 25, filtered 587, 3306
amavisd, spamassasin, etc.
Postfix w/ TLS, SASLAUTH, and only submission in master.cf
Only one user account
There are no entrie
Manuel Mely wrote:
mouss wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
My domain is example.com, and i have some subdomains (ie
ldap.example.com).
So the problem is: If i send a message with RCPT TO
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
check_recipient_access rules starts checking this subdomain, but since i
don't
Hi,
Someone could pass me any reference about how i not pass by amavis messages
come of my domains to my domains (i use virtual domain)
I have relay closed and authenticade and this measure would save my
resources.
Any reference?
[]´s
--
Eduardo Júnior
GNU/Linux user #423272
:wq
Manuel Mely wrote:
> mouss wrote:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>> [snip]
>>> My domain is example.com, and i have some subdomains (ie
>>> ldap.example.com).
>>>
>>> So the problem is: If i send a message with RCPT TO
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED],
>>> check_recipient_access rules starts checking this subdo
> look http://code.google.com/p/php-syslog-ng/
OK, it is very nice even if it takes a long time to analyze very large
database. Moreover, it not represents much information about mail log.
I prefer a tool like pflogsumm so that it can run 'off time' and it
cointains many other information that ar
mouss wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
My domain is example.com, and i have some subdomains (ie
ldap.example.com).
So the problem is: If i send a message with RCPT TO
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
check_recipient_access rules starts checking this subdomain, but since i
don't have this subdomain
HostA is:
internal mailhost,
CNAME of ns.example.com and
a fresh install of:
Fedora Core 8
Firestarter w open ports 53, 80, closed 25, filtered 587, 3306
amavisd, spamassasin, etc.
Postfix w/ TLS, SASLAUTH, and only submission in master.cf
Only one user account
There are no entries in syslog, sec
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 12:41:13PM +0200, Mauro Sanna wrote:
> Il giorno gio, 18/09/2008 alle 14.11 +0200, mouss ha scritto:
> > Mauro Sanna wrote:
> > > Hello, sorry for my bad english.
> > > I have to send messages to more than one person using a single mail
> > > address.
> > > So I've created
Il giorno gio, 18/09/2008 alle 14.11 +0200, mouss ha scritto:
> Mauro Sanna wrote:
> > Hello, sorry for my bad english.
> > I have to send messages to more than one person using a single mail
> > address.
> > So I've created a virtual-alias: [EMAIL PROTECTED] myaccount and a
> > text file, myaccoun
Thanks. I had added one transport which I had forgotten to add in
master.cf (braindead).
Regards,
ANANT.
Quoting "Duane Hill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear List,
I am getting mail transport unavailable for one specific domain
'elsevier.com'.
> It's too late to reject the mail that's already in your queue,
> better to identify the spam and discard it.
I see. That is an important information. OK, I will set up spamassassin and
requeue all mail.
Thanks to everyone for help.
--
Milos Prudek
Thanks again i added the relay host line you are right seems nicer no hashing
involved that makes it easier too.
Computer King & CaN Mail - Sales Service Hosting Backup
http://www.computerking.ca http://www.canmail.org
NEW!!! Custom Service Packages
Secure IMAP Email - Automated Remote Ba
RYAN vAN GINNEKEN wrote:
Ok Thank you very much ladies/gentlemen OK i added this to my
/etc/postfix/main.cf
transport_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/transport
Then set up this rule "* smtp:[hostaddress]:325" in my transport file then
hashed it with posthash to create transport.db an like magic
Ok Thank you very much ladies/gentlemen OK i added this to my
/etc/postfix/main.cf
transport_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/transport
Then set up this rule "* smtp:[hostaddress]:325" in my transport file then
hashed it with posthash to create transport.db an like magic it all works i am
receiving
* RYAN vAN GINNEKEN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I only need to send mail receiving is not that big of a deal for this
> machine. If i could get postfix to send outbound mail on port 325 that would
> be all i need.
>
> The server on the other end is already listening to port 325 actually port
> 325
34 matches
Mail list logo
