Are You Looking For A More Effective Way To Advertise?

2008-09-13 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Are You Looking For A More Effective Way To Advertise? For those of us trying to promote our business, service, product or whatever else, it's a constant job to advertise. Some of us have found some really superb ways of advertising and some are still dealing with some "trial and error" issues.

Debugging custom pipe transports

2008-09-13 Thread Ian R. Justman
Hi, all. Thanks for your thoughts on my previous questions. Now, I have a new dilemma on my hands. I'm trying to adapt the script "postfix-to-mailman.py" to operate with Ecartis rather than Mailman. What it boils down to is that I'm not having a lot of luck with it right now. First, some

Re: avoiding backscatter from forwarding

2008-09-13 Thread Robert Schetterer
mouss schrieb: Robert McQueen wrote: Our mail system has many addresses which we accept and forward to our users' addresses on other systems (ie, domain.com is a virtual alias domain, and we forward [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED], or whatever). We use both reject_unverified_sender and r

Re: avoiding backscatter from forwarding

2008-09-13 Thread Robert Schetterer
Robert McQueen schrieb: Our mail system has many addresses which we accept and forward to our users' addresses on other systems (ie, domain.com is a virtual alias domain, and we forward [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED], or whatever). We use both reject_unverified_sender and reject_unverifi

Re: avoiding backscatter from forwarding

2008-09-13 Thread mouss
Robert McQueen wrote: Our mail system has many addresses which we accept and forward to our users' addresses on other systems (ie, domain.com is a virtual alias domain, and we forward [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED], or whatever). We use both reject_unverified_sender and reject_unverified

avoiding backscatter from forwarding

2008-09-13 Thread Robert McQueen
Our mail system has many addresses which we accept and forward to our users' addresses on other systems (ie, domain.com is a virtual alias domain, and we forward [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED], or whatever). We use both reject_unverified_sender and reject_unverified_recipient to check that

Re: problem implementing domainkeys

2008-09-13 Thread Barney Desmond
2008/9/13 Ben Crowell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I'm attempting to implement domainkeys using Jason Long's > dkfilter. (If I'd been more knowledgeable, I'd have done > DKIM instead, but I think my current problem may be unrelated > to domainkeys versus DKIM.) As far as sysadmins care, dkim==domainkeys

Re: 550 550 5.1.1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> error

2008-09-13 Thread mouss
gishaust wrote: hi I having some trouble get postfix to going live. I am able to telnet 210.***.***.*** 25 or then send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and without fail it gets there or if I telnet ert.com 25 I can send mail without and issue. $ host -t mx ert.com ert.com mail is handled by 1

Re: 550 550 5.1.1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> error

2008-09-13 Thread Sahil Tandon
gishaust <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am able to telnet 210.***.***.*** 25 or then send an email to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] and without fail it gets there > or if I telnet ert.com 25 I can send mail without and issue. None of the ert.com MXs have an IP that begins with 210. > But If I go to my

550 550 5.1.1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> error

2008-09-13 Thread gishaust
hi I having some trouble get postfix to going live. I am able to telnet 210.***.***.*** 25 or then send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and without fail it gets there or if I telnet ert.com 25 I can send mail without and issue. But If I go to my gmail account and send an email to [EMAIL PROTE