bounce processing

Hi all, Our mail server is configured to use special envelope sender addresses for some outgoing mail so that bounces can be processed automatically. The "bounce processor" is a self-made script. Are there any hints what to look for in a bounced mail to be sure, that it really is a bounce caused

Re: Being tormented by a time out

Francisco Neira wrote: Actually I am using the most recent versions of everything in the Centos repositories. You can use http://postfix.wl0.org/ The same messages that are accepted in gmail, hotmail and my office's exim are rejected or at least not completed in that domain.

Re: Add Throttle to outbound email?

On Fri, Sep 05, 2008 at 12:15:19AM -0400, Sahil Tandon wrote: > Victor Duchovni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > % mailq | grep sender | cut -c 1-9 | postsuper -h - > > > > Postfix queue-ids don't have a fixed width, this is wrong. The length > > of a queue-id depends on the numerical range of

Re: Add Throttle to outbound email?

Victor Duchovni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > % mailq | grep sender | cut -c 1-9 | postsuper -h - > > Postfix queue-ids don't have a fixed width, this is wrong. The length > of a queue-id depends on the numerical range of mail queue inode > numbers. Woops, sorry for the noise; maybe the follow

Re: Add Throttle to outbound email?

see the example under the -d delete option (be sure to use postsuper -h instead of postsuper -d). Something like this (untested): # hold all mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailq | tail +2 | grep -v '^ *(' | awk 'BEGIN { RS = "" } { if ($7 == "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" ) print $1 } ' | tr -d '

Re: Add Throttle to outbound email?

On Thu, Sep 04, 2008 at 11:33:25PM -0400, Sahil Tandon wrote: > James Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I think i'll go with this. This might be a dumb question but I have > > about 600 messages that all have different ID's. man postsuper > > doesn't highlight how to hold messages fr

Re: Add Throttle to outbound email?

James Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think i'll go with this. This might be a dumb question but I have > about 600 messages that all have different ID's. man postsuper > doesn't highlight how to hold messages from a sender address? There is probably a more elegant way to do this, bu

Re: Add Throttle to outbound email?

James Robertson wrote: You could put all those messages on hold and release them after hours. man postsuper; man cron I think i'll go with this. This might be a dumb question but I have about 600 messages that all have different ID's. man postsuper doesn't highlight how to hold messages

Re: Add Throttle to outbound email?

You could put all those messages on hold and release them after hours. man postsuper; man cron I think i'll go with this. This might be a dumb question but I have about 600 messages that all have different ID's. man postsuper doesn't highlight how to hold messages from a sender address?

Re: Being tormented by a time out

Noel Jones wrote: Francisco Neira wrote: Hi all, Hope you can help me with this. I did a fresh install of Centos 5 with postfix-2.3.3-2 from RPMs, Spamassassin, Amavisd-new and Clamav. everything is going very good until I send messages to mail.osterlingfirm.com

Re: Add Throttle to outbound email?

James Robertson wrote: We have a client who has done a mailout which adds up to over 1GB in size. .. 1160910 Kbytes in 988 Requests .. Is there a way I can slow down or throttle the speed at which email is being sent from a specific email address once the mail is already active? It i

Add Throttle to outbound email?

We have a client who has done a mailout which adds up to over 1GB in size. .. 1160910 Kbytes in 988 Requests .. Is there a way I can slow down or throttle the speed at which email is being sent from a specific email address once the mail is already active? It is affecting there ADSL c

Re: Being tormented by a time out

Francisco: Francisco Neira wrote: Hi all, Hope you can help me with this. Not really, but I can feel your pain. I have the same symptoms with Ubuntu 8.04 and my domain's-relay. Small messages work, big ones timeout. And if you watch it on iftop you'll see it starting good and then suddenly s

Re: Being tormented by a time out

Francisco Neira wrote: Hi all, Hope you can help me with this. I did a fresh install of Centos 5 with postfix-2.3.3-2 from RPMs, Spamassassin, Amavisd-new and Clamav. everything is going very good until I send messages to mail.osterlingfirm.com if the message i

Being tormented by a time out

Hi all, Hope you can help me with this. I did a fresh install of Centos 5 with postfix-2.3.3-2 from RPMs, Spamassassin, Amavisd-new and Clamav. everything is going very good until I send messages to mail.osterlingfirm.com if the message is tiny, there are no problems anything bigger than 100k will

Re: alternate relay after local lookup failure

Matthew Riedel: > Dear Postfix Community, > > I have a bit of a conundrum that I can't seem to find an answer to in any of > the documentation (and believe me, I've poured over it). Below is our > somewhat sparse output of postconf -n. > > The problem is this: We currently have two machines acce

alternate relay after local lookup failure

Dear Postfix Community, I have a bit of a conundrum that I can't seem to find an answer to in any of the documentation (and believe me, I've poured over it). Below is our somewhat sparse output of postconf -n. The problem is this: We currently have two machines accepting mail for [EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: Messages slow to leave active queue

Mark Goodge wrote: I'm hoping someone can help point me in the right direction for the solution to this one. I'm in the process of adding a new server to an existing mail cluster, but for some reason I'm getting really slow throughput. The problem seems to be delays in the active queue - here's

Re: transport and sasl_password question

Micah wrote: Nope, I'm not surprised. It's not a big issue for most folks because my ISP services a fairly rural community and I'm probably the only customer not using their mail server. My ISP and I did contact MAPS and requested that they remove my static addresses from their lists, to whic

Re: Messages slow to leave active queue

Mark Goodge: > I'm hoping someone can help point me in the right direction for the > solution to this one. I'm in the process of adding a new server to an > existing mail cluster, but for some reason I'm getting really slow > throughput. The problem seems to be delays in the active queue - here'

Re: transport and sasl_password question

On Thu, September 4, 2008 8:56 am, mouss wrote: > Micah wrote: >> I've been fighting with this problem a bit now. Google and RTFM have >> been pretty kind to me, and I'm about 90% to having a solution >> implemented. I've gotten hung up on one little detail, and I find >> myself in need of some g

Re: filter question

Hement Gopal wrote: Hi all I'm running 2.0.13 on my mail gateway. I accept mail for [EMAIL PROTECTED] I also have a domain that I still receive mail for called @abc.mydomain.com This domain received a huge amount of junkmail for non existent mailboxes...the domain itself only

Re: transport and sasl_password question

Micah wrote: I've been fighting with this problem a bit now. Google and RTFM have been pretty kind to me, and I'm about 90% to having a solution implemented. I've gotten hung up on one little detail, and I find myself in need of some guidance. I run a RHEL5 server with postfix, clam, spamas

Re: Postfix and SASL via Dovecot

Erik Paulsen Skaalerud: > Anyone have a slightes idea of whats going on? Why isnt EHLO > mentioning authentication? This is why: > smtpd_sasl_exceptions_networks = $mynetworks Change things when you understand the consequences. Wietse

transport and sasl_password question

I've been fighting with this problem a bit now. Google and RTFM have been pretty kind to me, and I'm about 90% to having a solution implemented. I've gotten hung up on one little detail, and I find myself in need of some guidance. I run a RHEL5 server with postfix, clam, spamassassin, & dove

Re: Postfix and SASL via Dovecot

> mynetworks = 127.0.0.0/8, xx.xx.22.0/24, xx.xx.23.0/24 > Sep 4 15:12:48 ext02 postfix/smtpd[27123]: connect from > unknown[192.xx.xx.147] show a full ip address without xx

Postfix and SASL via Dovecot

Hello list. I'm trying to figure out why my postfix+dovecot successfully authenticates MS Outlook users when sending smtp, but fails when Entourage 2004 (Mac) tries to authenticate (gives the error "Authentication failed because Entourage doesn't support any of the available authentication methods

Re: filter question

On Thu, 2008-09-04 at 11:30 +0200, Hement Gopal wrote: > Hi all > > > > I’m running 2.0.13 on my mail gateway. > > > > I accept mail for [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > I also have a domain that I still receive mail for called > @abc.mydomain.com > > > > This domain received a huge amou

Re: smtp process limit above 1000?

xm niu wrote: At the moment there are 1300 computers sending their log mails at middlenight everyday. As a workaround: Why not insert a little randomness and let your computers send their logs e.g.: between middlenight and 1 am. [...] Discover the new Windows Vista Argh ;-). -- Greetings

Messages slow to leave active queue

I'm hoping someone can help point me in the right direction for the solution to this one. I'm in the process of adding a new server to an existing mail cluster, but for some reason I'm getting really slow throughput. The problem seems to be delays in the active queue - here's a sample from qsha

Re: smtp process limit above 1000?

xm niu: > > My postfix server: > postfix mail_version=2.3.8 > linux 2.6.23-12 On Linux, there is no reasonable way to do this with Postfix 2.3. Use a more recent Postfix version, or use a different O/S. Wietse

smtp process limit above 1000?

My postfix server: postfix mail_version=2.3.8 linux 2.6.23-12 2GB memory 2x2.4GHz CPUs with 2 cores on each CPU At the moment there are 1300 computers sending their log mails at middlenight everyday. I got the warning/error "smtp(25) have reach its process limit". I tested and have increas

filter question

Hi all I'm running 2.0.13 on my mail gateway. I accept mail for [EMAIL PROTECTED] I also have a domain that I still receive mail for called @abc.mydomain.com This domain received a huge amount of junkmail for non existent mailboxes...the domain itself only has about 25 legitimate m

Re: Disclaimer

Gabriel Craciun wrote: Hello! I am using postfix 2.3.3 on RHEL 5 acting as a relay. I also have content filtering and spf policy. I am required to add also an disclaimer for outgoing mails. I find documetation about using and configuring postfix+altermime but also i find out that it might be pos

Re: override transport_maps master.cf

Furs wrote: Hi folks, is it possible to override "transport_maps" in master.cf? no. transport_maps are global. use multiple instances: run postfix multiple times. I have "transport_maps=hash:/etc/transport.1" defined in "main.cf", in master.cf i have: 127.0.0.1:10027 inet n - n

Re: help with dkim and spf

shawn D.Wang wrote: [snip] obviously, the sender-id works very well, but still no passed for hotmail. so weired... are we talking about ngstyle.cn? what is the IP that sends mail? if it is 120.72.34.79, then you'll have problems $ host 120.72.34.79 Host 79.34.72.120.in-addr.arpa. not found

Disclaimer

Hello! I am using postfix 2.3.3 on RHEL 5 acting as a relay. I also have content filtering and spf policy. I am required to add also an disclaimer for outgoing mails. I find documetation about using and configuring postfix+altermime but also i find out that it might be possible that the content fi

override transport_maps master.cf

Hi folks, is it possible to override "transport_maps" in master.cf? I have "transport_maps=hash:/etc/transport.1" defined in "main.cf", in master.cf i have: 127.0.0.1:10027 inet n - n - 16 smtpd -o transport_maps=hash:/etc/transport.2 Some mails are filtered and