--On Thursday, July 24, 2008 11:57 AM -0400 Victor Duchovni
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Your mental model of this is flawed. Postfix runs hundreds of cleanup
servers, hundreds of smtpd servers, further-more, if tables are not
carefully defined to have identical values for connection-related
para
On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 9:45 PM, Sahil Tandon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Linux Addict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi, I have virtual zone on a postfix mail relay.
> >
> > Virtual Zone Virtual Alias
> > zone1.example.com [EMAIL PR
Linux Addict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, I have virtual zone on a postfix mail relay.
>
> Virtual Zone Virtual Alias
> zone1.example.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] goes to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> zone1.example.com is managed by us which
2008/8/9 Linux Addict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] goes to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> The problem I am facing is, the postfix server is resolving example.net to
> external address, but I really want to send those mails to internal SMTP
> address of example.net(Exchange Server).
It sounds l
Juan Miscaro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would like to confirm a proposed solution to the following problem:
>
> Multiple virtual mailbox domains will have all mail destined to their
> respective postmaster (and abuse) accounts sent to a single
> other-domain address. So
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED
I installed a port of Berkeley db41-4.1.25_4 so I could build Cyrus
(via another port) and having an issue trying to get postfix to build
against it.
I need to make sure postfix and cyrus link against the same bdb of course.
#locate libdb41
/usr/local/lib/libdb41.a
/usr/local/lib/libdb41.so
/u
Hi, I have virtual zone on a postfix mail relay.
Virtual Zone Virtual Alias
zone1.example.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] goes to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
zone1.example.com is managed by us which is postfix
example.net is Exchange server managed by a
* S P Arif Sahari Wibowo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi!
>
> I have one server using before queue content filter which sometime have
> resource problem (mail delivery slow down bogged down by spams and
> unreachable servers). Just not too long time ago I found about SMTPD
> access policy delegation.
Hi!
I have one server using before queue content filter which
sometime have resource problem (mail delivery slow down bogged
down by spams and unreachable servers). Just not too long time
ago I found about SMTPD access policy delegation. Since the
filter do nothing to the e-mail other than ac
Chip Marshall:
> Came across something odd today. I was trying to sign up at fuelly.com,
> but my Postfix mail server is rejecting their signup confirmation e-mail
> with the following:
>
> Aug 8 12:03:47 kyzoku postfix/smtpd[38670]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
> fuelly.com[174.133.216.50]: 450 4
Came across something odd today. I was trying to sign up at fuelly.com,
but my Postfix mail server is rejecting their signup confirmation e-mail
with the following:
Aug 8 12:03:47 kyzoku postfix/smtpd[38670]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
fuelly.com[174.133.216.50]: 450 4.1.8 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: S
Thanks, you're the best. I used it and works perfectly!
Actually, I was reading ldap_table but I didn't understand result_format
(previously called as result_filter) correctly.
You explained it better than the man page for me.
Thanks again, bytes!
Graham Leggett escribió:
Jason Voorhees wrot
Jason Voorhees wrote:
My problem begins here: I don't want to use the value returned by
result_attribute, instead I want to use a custom value to return (i.e.
[EMAIL PROTECTED])
You are looking for the result_filter option, which allows you to filter
the attribute returned, or even replacing
> lists.domain.com vs maillists1.domain.com?
I have changed myhostname=lists.domain.com and
changed /etc/hostname to lists.domain.com
and restarted postfix/mailman and it's working, thanks Benny/Brian!
Is it possible to have mailman run
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
or is it restricted
Hi folks:
This is my first post to this list and my spanish isn't very good, so I
hope to be lucky getting help.
I'm running Postfix and LDAP as a backend authentication for users
within OpenXchange Server 5.
I need to apply certain restrictions (i.e. bcc_maps, recipient_access,
sender_acces
On 8/8/2008, Noel Jones ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
It looks as if you already consulted the documentation and just want
to confirm your interpretation of it. That's good, but say so next
time or you'll just be pointed back to the docs.
Heh... yeah, should have said so... but thanks for reading
* Charles Marcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On 8/8/2008 2:15 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
>>> The reason I ask is, currently, I relay all outbound mail through our
>>> outsourced anti-spam service (smtp.example1.com).
>
>> Why? Are you afraid you're sending spam?
>
> Nope, just another layer of securi
On 8/8/2008 2:15 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
The reason I ask is, currently, I relay all outbound mail through our
outsourced anti-spam service (smtp.example1.com).
Why? Are you afraid you're sending spam?
Nope, just another layer of security - they provide the service as part
of the stand
* Charles Marcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
> I know this is simple, but I never had to do it, so wanna check myself...
>
> For outbound mail, do transport entries supersede the relayhost parameter
> in main.cf?
Yes.
> The reason I ask is, currently, I relay all outbound mail through our
> o
Mineur, Niels wrote:
And postfix on the localhost address to use an alternative transport map
127.0.0.1:smtp inet n- n - - smtpd
-o transport_maps=hash:/etc/postfix/transport.alt
... it seems however that
postfix is only looking at the primary transp
Hi everyone,
I would like to confirm a proposed solution to the following problem:
Multiple virtual mailbox domains will have all mail destined to their
respective postmaster (and abuse) accounts sent to a single
other-domain address. So
[EMAIL PROTECTED] -> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Charles Marcus wrote:
Hi,
I know this is simple, but I never had to do it, so wanna check myself...
For outbound mail, do transport entries supersede the relayhost
parameter in main.cf?
The reason I ask is, currently, I relay all outbound mail through our
outsourced anti-spam service (smtp.
Charles Marcus wrote:
Hi,
I know this is simple, but I never had to do it, so wanna check myself...
For outbound mail, do transport entries supersede the relayhost
parameter in main.cf?
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#relayhost has your answer.
Brian
Hi,
I know this is simple, but I never had to do it, so wanna check myself...
For outbound mail, do transport entries supersede the relayhost
parameter in main.cf?
The reason I ask is, currently, I relay all outbound mail through our
outsourced anti-spam service (smtp.example1.com).
We are
Marcelo Iturbe:
> I did a test via telnet and after I end data with . I get
> the "250 Ok: queued " message around 10 to 20 seconds afterwards.
Since you gave zero configuration information, you can try for
the following yourself:
1) You have a broken before-queue content filter.
2) Your queue m
* Marcelo Iturbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hello,
> My mail server is taking about 15 seconds to accept an email and place it in
> queue.
>
> I did a test via telnet and after I end data with . I get
> the "250 Ok: queued " message around 10 to 20 seconds afterwards.
* DNS issues?
* busy with I/O?
*
>Hello,
>My mail server is taking about 15 seconds to accept an email and place it in
>queue.
Try adding this to main.cf
disable_dns_lookups = yes
This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the
individual addressee(s) named above. If you are not an intended recipi
Hello,
My mail server is taking about 15 seconds to accept an email and place it in
queue.
I did a test via telnet and after I end data with . I get
the "250 Ok: queued " message around 10 to 20 seconds afterwards.
The server is quite idle so I am not sure what is going on
This is the log from t
On Fri, 8 Aug 2008, Jorey Bump wrote:
Please keep responses on the list:
Justin Piszcz wrote, at 08/08/2008 10:27 AM:
On Fri, 8 Aug 2008, Jorey Bump wrote:
Justin Piszcz wrote, at 08/08/2008 07:53 AM:
Multiple PTR records tend to be returned in a round robin fashion:
$ host 38.119.56.1
Please keep responses on the list:
Justin Piszcz wrote, at 08/08/2008 10:27 AM:
On Fri, 8 Aug 2008, Jorey Bump wrote:
Justin Piszcz wrote, at 08/08/2008 07:53 AM:
Multiple PTR records tend to be returned in a round robin fashion:
$ host 38.119.56.160
160.56.119.38.in-addr.arpa domain name
Hi,
I am currently working on a project to reroute email to a server based
on the user part of the recipient address.
Like so:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] -> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] -> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
@mydomain.com -> @mydomain.com
(stays unaltered)
However, if the us
Tait Grove wrote:
Every time my central SAN’s restarts, everyone that “Leaves a message
on the server” has to download all of their emails again. What makes
the client program want to download the message again?
-- Tait
It's nothing Postfix related.
Postfix is not involved with "do
Cameron Camp wrote:
Guess #1: lists.domain.com is not in
mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql-virtual_domains.cf
Use 'postmap -q lists.domain.com
mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql-virtual_domains.cf' to check.
Please report back with more details.
I added the domain to the mysql db, and now I ran
Justin Piszcz wrote, at 08/08/2008 07:53 AM:
On the server w/ postfix:
$ host 38.119.56.160
160.56.119.38.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer
mta700.testemail.newegg.com.
160.56.119.38.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer mta700.email.newegg.com.
When it re-connected (after greylisting, then it wo
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Reinaldo de Carvalho
Sent: Friday, August 08, 2008 4:46 AM
To: Tait Grove; Postfix users
Subject: Re: Redownload Messages
>
> Every time my central SAN's restarts, everyone that "Leaves a message on
the
> ser
On Fri, 8 Aug 2008, Justin Piszcz wrote:
On the server w/ postfix:
$ host 38.119.56.160
160.56.119.38.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer mta700.testemail.newegg.com.
160.56.119.38.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer mta700.email.newegg.com.
When it re-connected (after greylisting, then it works
>
> Every time my central SAN's restarts, everyone that "Leaves a message on the
> server" has to download all of their emails again. What makes the client
> program want to download the message again?
>
Possible pop3 server problem.
--
Reinaldo de Carvalho
http://korreio.sf.net
http://python-cy
On the server w/ postfix:
$ host 38.119.56.160
160.56.119.38.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer mta700.testemail.newegg.com.
160.56.119.38.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer mta700.email.newegg.com.
Is the reason below why it shows up as unknown because the fwd/reverse do
not match properly, or?
Every time my central SAN's restarts, everyone that "Leaves a message on the
server" has to download all of their emails again. What makes the client
program want to download the message again?
-- Tait
Sandy Drobic wrote:
Have a look at the subject of this thread. Many readers of this list
probably deleted the thread immediately after seeing the subject. (^-^)
Oops.
It didn't matter though, at least one person didn't, and helped root out
the source of the problem.
Regards,
Graham
--
sm
Graham Leggett wrote:
You would probably have received much more helpful answers if you had
asked about a soure ip address instead of the source port.
Looking back, I did ask about a source IP address...?
Have a look at the subject of this thread. Many readers of this list probably
deleted
This is an answer from ANS Notification system
Bad response. Specify actionid, PIN, alarmid, entityid, ruleid and send a
letter again. [EMAIL PROTECTED] entity= alarm=0 action=UNKNOWN rule=0
First 20 lines of your mail follows:
==
* Stan Hoeppner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Is the C
* Rich Shepard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Thu, 7 Aug 2008, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>
>> Oh, heheh. No, I meant like do I need to be running postmap on it from
>> the command line kinda scenario, like with the access file.
>
> Stan,
>
> Yes: postmap.
No. You can't postmap cidr, pcre or regexp files.
* Stan Hoeppner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Is the CIDR file a plain text flat file? Do I need to run any commands
> against it to do the binary conversions or is that something Postfix does
flat file, no need to do anything
> I.e., can I just edit my access file, converting the dotted doubles,
44 matches
Mail list logo
