Velvet Pixel wrote:
> I think I understand what anvil is now.
>
> So to be clear, all listings in postfix/anvil are clients trying to
> connect to use my system to send and has nothing to do with messages
> received (such as spam) by my system or is it both?
>
Right, clients connecting to your
On Jul 29, 2008, at 10:32 PM, MrC wrote:
Velvet Pixel wrote:
A grep of smtp returns two types of entries. A postfix/smtp and a
postfix/anvil.
When I grep the ID of a sample of each they look like this:
postfix/smtp:
Jul 29 20:14:11 vps postfix/smtp[21650]: A85225A08723:
to=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Velvet Pixel wrote:
>
> A grep of smtp returns two types of entries. A postfix/smtp and a
> postfix/anvil.
>
> When I grep the ID of a sample of each they look like this:
>
> postfix/smtp:
> Jul 29 20:14:11 vps postfix/smtp[21650]: A85225A08723:
> to=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> relay=gmail-smtp-in.l.
Thank you for your help Sahil!
A grep of smtp returns two types of entries. A postfix/smtp and a
postfix/anvil.
When I grep the ID of a sample of each they look like this:
postfix/smtp:
Jul 29 20:14:11 vps postfix/smtp[21650]: A85225A08723:
to=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
relay=gmail-smtp-in.l.goog
Hi, I was wondering if there was a way to filter-out the extra mail generated
when someone sends to a Alias AND to user@ who is also part of the alias?
Velvet Pixel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How can I tell from looking at my maillog file what emails have been sent
> from my system?
>
> I don't care about local deliveries.
> I just want to know what was sent from my server to other servers.
Without any more information about your system, you
How can I tell from looking at my maillog file what emails have been
sent from my system?
I don't care about local deliveries.
I just want to know what was sent from my server to other servers.
Thanks!
Cameron
kbajwa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> CentOS 5.2
> Postfix-2.2.3 (Comes packaged with CentOS)
> Dovecot-1.1.1
> Dovecot.Sieve-1.1.5
>
> -
> This is somewhat a vague question!
>
> I have three computers setup with the above system. On my Win XP PC I am
> getting
CentOS 5.2
Postfix-2.2.3 (Comes packaged with CentOS)
Dovecot-1.1.1
Dovecot.Sieve-1.1.5
-
This is somewhat a vague question!
I have three computers setup with the above system. On my Win XP PC I am
getting the following error:
Rules in Error
Rule Erro
MPays wrote:
All,
I have postfix 2.3.8 running on a debian etch vps, I have everything
running as i need, with the exception of virtual aliased domains. I
would like to be able to setup forwarders on one domain, and for other
domains that are aliased to it pick up these forwarders. At the mom
All,
I have postfix 2.3.8 running on a debian etch vps, I have everything
running as i need, with the exception of virtual aliased domains. I
would like to be able to setup forwarders on one domain, and for other
domains that are aliased to it pick up these forwarders. At the moment
it reject
Michael Fernández M wrote:
Hi
I'm having some problems with virtual_alias_maps, i mean: all this time
this worked fine, however i do not why and i can not find why is
happening this now...
I have alias and accounts on LDAP, Ldap is ok.. postfix found accounts,
however the alias are not foun
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello All;
I currently have the following setup in my main.cf:
alias_maps = dbm:/etc/postfix/aliases, nis:mail.aliases
I've also enabled myself to receive email for about 15 domains.
Everything works just fine, but because of some new domains I am now charged
with ma
Hi
I'm having some problems with virtual_alias_maps, i mean: all this time
this worked fine, however i do not why and i can not find why is
happening this now...
I have alias and accounts on LDAP, Ldap is ok.. postfix found accounts,
however the alias are not found.
Every time i send a mail
Hello All;
I currently have the following setup in my main.cf:
alias_maps = dbm:/etc/postfix/aliases, nis:mail.aliases
I've also enabled myself to receive email for about 15 domains.
Everything works just fine, but because of some new domains I am now charged
with maintaining, I am now faced
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 08:21:09PM +0200, Matthias Andree wrote:
> > > smtp_sasl_tls_verified_security_options apparently stopped working after
> > > the upgrade.
> >
> > There has never been an official release where this feature is fully
> > implemented. The code for 2.6 is ready, but it is in
On Tue, 29 Jul 2008, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 03:32:52PM +0200, Matthias Andree wrote:
>
> > Greetings,
> >
> > I have recently upgraded from a homebrewn Postfix 2.4 or 2.5
> > /experimental/ package to openSUSE 11.0's official package, which is
> > based on postfix-2.5.1
Carlos Alberto Bernat Orozco wrote:
Hi group
I'm writing to you as my only hope. I'm very dissapointed because I'm
black listed due to a misconfiguration that I haven't found where.
This is the problem. From a time, I've been watching my logs and this
is what I see:
Jul 14 23:48:21 server post
gabriele esposito wrote:
I run Debian etch and i use smtp.gmail.com as postfix relayhost.
I also have a list of senders from different domains allowed to relay
smtp traffic on my server .
While for local senders in $myorigin i want my postfix to relay smtp
with gmail , for users in the list i wan
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 03:32:52PM +0200, Matthias Andree wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I have recently upgraded from a homebrewn Postfix 2.4 or 2.5
> /experimental/ package to openSUSE 11.0's official package, which is
> based on postfix-2.5.1.
>
> smtp_sasl_tls_verified_security_options apparently s
Scott Kitterman wrote:
On Tue, 29 Jul 2008 14:59:25 +0100 Evan Ingram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Tue, 2008-07-29 at 15:46 +0200, mouss wrote:
some sites drop traffic from residential blocks, which could explain why
you cannot connect.
Hmmm That would make sense. But what about the other ma
On Tue, 29 Jul 2008 14:59:25 +0100 Evan Ingram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>On Tue, 2008-07-29 at 15:46 +0200, mouss wrote:
>> some sites drop traffic from residential blocks, which could explain why
>> you cannot connect.
>
>
>Hmmm That would make sense. But what about the other machines I have
>
On Tue, 2008-07-29 at 15:46 +0200, mouss wrote:
> some sites drop traffic from residential blocks, which could explain why
> you cannot connect.
Hmmm That would make sense. But what about the other machines I have
here being able to connect to the problem mail servers via telnet etc
but my mail
Evan Ingram wrote:
On Tue, 2008-07-29 at 15:02 +0200, mouss wrote:
check the firewall configuration. and if the postfix machine has
firewall software (or selinux/apparamor), check that as well.
Everything outbound should be allowed, port 25 is forwarded to the mail
server.
For the majority
Yup that fixed it, thanks alot. I am quite new with unix systems, and mail,
so i would never had thought of that, thanks man.
Danny
2008/7/29 Sahil Tandon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Danny Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hello.
> >
> > Im having some problem sending mail, i can receive mails
Greetings,
I have recently upgraded from a homebrewn Postfix 2.4 or 2.5
/experimental/ package to openSUSE 11.0's official package, which is
based on postfix-2.5.1.
smtp_sasl_tls_verified_security_options apparently stopped working after
the upgrade.
Am I missing something in my configuration?
On Tue, 2008-07-29 at 15:02 +0200, mouss wrote:
> check the firewall configuration. and if the postfix machine has
> firewall software (or selinux/apparamor), check that as well.
Everything outbound should be allowed, port 25 is forwarded to the mail
server.
For the majority of mail servers its
Evan Ingram wrote:
On Tue, 2008-07-29 at 13:53 +0200, mouss wrote:
$ telnet aserver 25
...
EHLO yourhostname.example.com
...
QUIT
and post whatever you see.
From the mail server machine it doesn't connect, just sits there trying:
telnet mail.staugustines.uk.com 25
Trying 79.170.40.19...
On Tue, 2008-07-29 at 13:53 +0200, mouss wrote:
> $ telnet aserver 25
> ...
> EHLO yourhostname.example.com
> ...
> QUIT
>
> and post whatever you see.
>From the mail server machine it doesn't connect, just sits there trying:
telnet mail.staugustines.uk.com 25
Trying 79.170.40.19...
Works from
Voytek Eymont wrote:
I have some web generated emails being sent as 'apache@' [as the default
web user]
now, an isp appears to be doing a user lookup as below and bounces emails,
claiming this server is mis-configured:
is there any requirement on me having an 'apache@' address if I'm sending
em
Evan Ingram wrote:
Hi all,
In need of some help. A lot of people sending me email are getting them
bounced. All i see in the logs is:
status=deferred (connect to aserver: Connection timed out)
yes, this happens when ...
do not truncate log lines or we will truncate our answers ;-p
What c
Hi all,
In need of some help. A lot of people sending me email are getting them
bounced. All i see in the logs is:
status=deferred (connect to aserver: Connection timed out)
What can i do to check my config? The mail server is sat on a box which
is behind another box running as a firewall and th
Voytek Eymont schrieb:
I have some web generated emails being sent as 'apache@' [as the default
web user]
now, an isp appears to be doing a user lookup as below and bounces emails,
claiming this server is mis-configured:
is there any requirement on me having an 'apache@' address if I'm sending
Zitat von Voytek Eymont <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I have some web generated emails being sent as 'apache@' [as the default
web user]
now, an isp appears to be doing a user lookup as below and bounces emails,
claiming this server is mis-configured:
is there any requirement on me having an 'apache@'
I have some web generated emails being sent as 'apache@' [as the default
web user]
now, an isp appears to be doing a user lookup as below and bounces emails,
claiming this server is mis-configured:
is there any requirement on me having an 'apache@' address if I'm sending
emails as such ?
TIA,
-
mouss wrote:
you need to learn regexp. @* means one or more '@'.
oops. zero or more not one or more...
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 5:49 AM, Carlos Alberto Bernat Orozco
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A lot of this. It appears I'm sending backscatter email. The account
> "ber" doesn't even exist and the "from=<>" is impossible to block
> until moment. I read the next:
>
> http://www.postfix.org/BACKSCATTER
37 matches
Mail list logo
