What log message should I look for when a message has been deferred
and Postfix has decided it is undeliverable? (I'm parsing the log and
need to know how to distinguish this from an actual bounce.) Will the
log contain a 5xx message for that mail?
--
Hi:
I"m using content filtering by using the following (this is the
example) syntax in master.cf:
smtp inet ...other stuff here, do not change... smtpd
-o content_filter=myfilter:myfilter
myfilter unix - n n - 10 pipe
flags..
All is wo
The Postfix 2.5.3 stable release fixes minor issues that were also
fixed in the experimental release series.
Soon available from the download sites listed at http://www.postfix.org/
9006 Jul 27 17:05 postfix-2.5-patch03.gz
503552 Jul 27 16:45 postfix-2.5.3.HISTORY
17019 Jul 27 16:27 p
CentOS 5.2
Postfix-2.3.3
Dovecot-1.1.1
Dovecot.Sieve-1.1.5
I have setup with:
home_mailbox = Maildir/ (/etc/postfix/main.cf) &
mail-location = maildir:~/Maildir (/etc/dovecot.conf)
I have created a 'test' user to test Sieve 'Vacation' setup. My questions
are:
1. Which folder '.dovecot.sieve'
Jeff Weinberger:
> I don't know if this is possible in a virtual alias (or even virtual)
> set up, but I would like to be able to set up a user name with a
> wildcard domain. Here's what I mean:
>
> I host several domains. I would like the address '[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ' to go to the same plac
I don't know if this is possible in a virtual alias (or even virtual)
set up, but I would like to be able to set up a user name with a
wildcard domain. Here's what I mean:
I host several domains. I would like the address '[EMAIL PROTECTED]
' to go to the same place (me). So my initial though
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 11:13 AM, mouss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> you should have posted this to the other thread:
>"Rewriting Subject line, adding an X-header?"
> (always think of the archives).
Indeed. There seems to be a lot of good stuff in the archives!
> note that just because yo
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> >> voidrecipient_list_add(RECIPIENT_LIST *list, long offset,
> >> const char *dsn_orcpt, int dsn_notify,
> >> const char *orig_rcpt, const char *rcpt)
> >
> > You can't change the rcpt argume
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>> voidrecipient_list_add(RECIPIENT_LIST *list, long offset,
>> const char *dsn_orcpt, int dsn_notify,
>> const char *orig_rcpt, const char *rcpt)
>
> You can't change the rcpt argument.
>
>> {
>> int n
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>>> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>>> >> , postfix reload; and postfix stills working as always.
>>> >
>>> > Show actual evidence of behavior that does not change, and show
>>> > actual evidence based on which it should have changed.
>>> >
>>> > Wietse
>>> >
>>>
>>> It's easy. On my
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> voidrecipient_list_add(RECIPIENT_LIST *list, long offset,
> const char *dsn_orcpt, int dsn_notify,
> const char *orig_rcpt, const char *rcpt)
You can't change the rcpt argument.
> {
> int new_avail;
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> >> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> >> >> , postfix reload; and postfix stills working as always.
> >> >
> >> > Show actual evidence of behavior that does not change, and show
> >> > actual evidence based on which it should have changed.
> >> >
> >> > Wietse
> >>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>> >> , postfix reload; and postfix stills working as always.
>> >
>> > Show actual evidence of behavior that does not change, and show
>> > actual evidence based on which it should have changed.
>> >
>> >Wietse
>> >
>>
>> It's easy. On my modified l
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> >> , postfix reload; and postfix stills working as always.
> >
> > Show actual evidence of behavior that does not change, and show
> > actual evidence based on which it should have changed.
> >
> > Wietse
> >
>
> It's easy. On my modified library, I
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>> , postfix reload; and postfix stills working as always.
>
> Show actual evidence of behavior that does not change, and show
> actual evidence based on which it should have changed.
>
> Wietse
>
It's easy. On my modified library, I modify recipient_list_add(...)
functi
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> , postfix reload; and postfix stills working as always.
Show actual evidence of behavior that does not change, and show
actual evidence based on which it should have changed.
Wietse
Ville Walveranta wrote:
I've been looking for the last day (on and off :-) at Todd Bennett's
smtpprox (see http://bent.latency.net/smtpprox/ ). It would likely do
what you're looking to do with minimal modifications.
My goal is to look for the Subject of the arriving messages
you should have p
mouss wrote:
LDB wrote:
I need a message to immediately go to /dev/null
if it hard bounces once.
Set to zero this works,
maximal_queue_lifetime = 0
but I do not want it to go back to the sender.
I need it to go to /dev/null.
Any suggestions???
What problem are you trying to solve?
disc
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>> Thank you. I try that some days ago but it didn't work.
>
> It works only if you understand its limitations.
>
> The import_environment feature executes AFTER the run-time linker
> completes execution. Therefore, import_environment cannot affect
> the run-time linker perform
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Thank you. I try that some days ago but it didn't work.
It works only if you understand its limitations.
The import_environment feature executes AFTER the run-time linker
completes execution. Therefore, import_environment cannot affect
the run-time linker performance for the
Thank you. I try that some days ago but it didn't work.
I'll retry it!
Antonio G. Artime
Daniel Bareiro wrote:
Hi all!
I am trying to configure my home Postfix so that the outgoing mail to an
external email from a user of my LAN are rewritten to a valid account of
mail, which would be to me especially useful if I would want to send
some type of notification to a external mail by mea
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#import_environment
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#export_environment
Wietse
mouss:
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
> Jay Chandler wrote:
> > Is there a way to exempt users from the always_bcc option (i.e., general
> > counsel doesn't want mail logged in the system)? I seem to recall there
> > was a way to build an exclusion class, but my brain's gone t
LDB wrote:
I need a message to immediately go to /dev/null
if it hard bounces once.
Set to zero this works,
maximal_queue_lifetime = 0
but I do not want it to go back to the sender.
I need it to go to /dev/null.
Any suggestions???
What problem are you trying to solve?
discarding mail th
Hello everybody:
I'm trying to modify some functions on postfix source and then preload
them by using LD_PRELOAD. To get it work, I've modified
/etc/postfix/postfix-script as follows:
[...]
overlay)
export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=./:/usr/local/lib/:$LD_LIBRARY_PATH
export LD_PRELOAD=/home/antoni
Jay Chandler wrote:
Is there a way to exempt users from the always_bcc option (i.e., general
counsel doesn't want mail logged in the system)? I seem to recall there
was a way to build an exclusion class, but my brain's gone to bed before
I have tonight, it would seem...
use recipient_bcc_ma
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all!
I am trying to configure my home Postfix so that the outgoing mail to an
external email from a user of my LAN are rewritten to a valid account of
mail, which would be to me especially useful if I would want to send
some type of notification to
I need a message to immediately go to /dev/null
if it hard bounces once.
Set to zero this works,
maximal_queue_lifetime = 0
but I do not want it to go back to the sender.
I need it to go to /dev/null.
Any suggestions???
Thanks,
LDB
I've been looking for the last day (on and off :-) at Todd Bennett's
smtpprox (see http://bent.latency.net/smtpprox/ ). It would likely do
what you're looking to do with minimal modifications.
My goal is to look for the Subject of the arriving messages (all
arriving messages will be filtered throu
Is there a way to exempt users from the always_bcc option (i.e.,
general counsel doesn't want mail logged in the system)? I seem to
recall there was a way to build an exclusion class, but my brain's
gone to bed before I have tonight, it would seem...
--Jay
31 matches
Mail list logo
