Re: [update] misc/ietf-cli

2025-01-28 Thread Klemens Nanni
28 янв. 2025 г. 23:45:12 Stuart Henderson : > I don't get MODPY_BUILDDEP=Yes. That's the default, and python isn't > needed at build time anyway - should it have been MODPY_BUILDDEP=No? Perhaps I set it for MODPY_ADJ_FILES, but that doesn't require python really, so feel free to drop or change i

Re: [update] misc/ietf-cli

2025-01-28 Thread Klemens Nanni
28 янв. 2025 г. 23:31:03 Peter Hessler : > And after this is committed, I would also like to add it to -stable > because of 1.27's TagBase update, OK? Sure, OK kn with the REVISION caveat so that current stays ahead.

Re: [update] misc/ietf-cli

2025-01-28 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2025/01/28 21:30, Peter Hessler wrote: > And after this is committed, I would also like to add it to -stable > because of 1.27's TagBase update, OK? You'll need REVISION=0 in the version in -current if you commit it to -stable. (That's ok with me). I don't get MODPY_BUILDDEP=Yes. That's the de

Re: [update] misc/ietf-cli

2025-01-28 Thread Theo Buehler
On Tue, Jan 28, 2025 at 09:30:52PM +0100, Peter Hessler wrote: > And after this is committed, I would also like to add it to -stable > because of 1.27's TagBase update, OK? Oh, yes, please. Thank you. And it makes sense to me to backport since important functionality is broken. ok tb

Re: [update] misc/ietf-cli

2025-01-28 Thread Peter Hessler
And after this is committed, I would also like to add it to -stable because of 1.27's TagBase update, OK? On 2025 Jan 28 (Tue) at 21:29:26 +0100 (+0100), Peter Hessler wrote: :# 1.27 :#Updated TagBase for change to https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc-index :# 1.28 :#Added "(obsolete)" in fro