Hi,
I submitted a PR back in November 2023 with a patch to update owl-lisp
from v0.1.23 to v0.2.2. At the moment, the port is orphaned and I'm
interested in adopting.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=275337
// Paco
ong as its committed.
// Paco
From 2f3b6d6ee9cfc01dec95acc04698538e5abfda29 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paco Pascal
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2025 17:28:14 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] new port: math/pcalc
---
math/pcalc/Makefile | 30 ++
math/pcalc/distinfo
When deciding between PLIST_FILES or pkg-plist, portlint and the
handbook conflict. The handbook has the following note,
Usage of PLIST_FILES should not be abused. When looking for the origin
of a file, people usually try to grep through the pkg-plist files in
the ports tree. Listing f
I am writing a port for gf2. The developer of gf2 is inconsistent with the
name, switching between "gf" and "gf2". Because of this, I wasn't sure what to
name the port and almost sent a patch with the wrong PORTNAME. It might be
handy to have portlint spit out a warning to catch when the PORTNAM
