devel/py-urwid and devel/py-setuptools_scm (PR# 274411)

2023-12-30 Thread Lexi Winter
hi list, i've just tried to install net-im/toot, and was stymied by PR#274411[0] ("devel/py-urwid Update to 2.2.x breaks several python packages") which has caused devel/py-urwid to be broken. the proper fix for this seems to be D39288[1] ("devel/py-setuptools_scm: update to 8.0.4"), but that's a

Re: devel/py-urwid and devel/py-setuptools_scm (PR# 274411)

2024-01-15 Thread Lexi Winter
hi all, i previously wrote: > i've just tried to install net-im/toot, and was stymied by PR#274411[0] > ("devel/py-urwid Update to 2.2.x breaks several python packages") which > has caused devel/py-urwid to be broken. > > the proper fix for this seems to be D39288[1] ("devel/py-setuptools_scm: >

USES=python3.10+ and RUN_DEPENDS

2024-01-21 Thread Lexi Winter
hi all, i'm trying to port an application that requires Python 3.10+ or later, while the default Python is still 3.9. this is my Makefile: https://git.sr.ht/~lw/freebsd-ports/tree/sublime-music/item/audio/py-sublime-music/Makefile running poudriere testport initially produces several messages l

Re: USES=python3.10+ and RUN_DEPENDS

2024-01-21 Thread Lexi Winter
Moin Rahman: >On Jan 21, 2024, at 8:26 PM, Lexi Winter wrote: > > i'm trying to port an application that requires Python 3.10+ or later, > > while the default Python is still 3.9. > > .if ${PYTHON_REL} < 31000 > IGNORE= Does not support python 3.9 or ear

Re: USES=python3.10+ and RUN_DEPENDS

2024-01-21 Thread Lexi Winter
Moin Rahman: > By default this will not be built in that case. If you want to build > for python 3.10 you have to add USE_PYTHON=allflavors thanks (again). so for a normal port, is there any guidance on whether i should do this or not? is there a policy on this? this is a normal (desktop) appli

ports commit request

2024-02-25 Thread Lexi Winter
hello, if someone has a moment, could you please commit this patch: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=276347 this is a trivial patch to make a broken port as BROKEN=. thanks, lexi. signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Confused by what make package should do

2024-04-12 Thread Lexi Winter
Matthew Phillips: > It definitely is attempting to install in the port I'm working on. The > port's Makefile does not do so when just running `make`. Do you have any > idea why make package would be trying to install? is it trying to install the port itself, or its dependencies? it will always tr

subpackages status?

2024-06-07 Thread Lexi Winter
hello, what's the current status of subpackages in ports? i'm considering porting something that contains a large number of dynamically-loaded shared objects (.so files) with many dependencies. this seems like an ideal use-case for subpackages, but from what i remember, these are currently not b