Re: Commit request devel/pycharm-ce

Hi! > Can a committer please review and commit: > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=264859 > > It's been in the queue for nearly a month now. Committed, thanks! -- p...@freebsd.org +49 171 3101372 Now what ?

Re: problem building graphics/drm-kmod

Hi! > 14.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 14.0-CURRENT #0 main-d6327ae8c1: Sun Jan 24 14:16:54 EST > 2021 amd64 If this is really a 14.0 box from beginning of 2021, I strongly suggest to update to a more recent current or 13.1. A lot happened since Jan. 2021 in the compile tool chain, so a recent drm-kmod pr

Re: Commit PR 264043

Hi! > please commit the supplied patch. devel/py-click is broken for months. Done. -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372Now what ?

Re: make config stopped working

Hi! > after todays??? git pull, for example if i do: > > cd /usr/ports/editors/emacs > make config > i get > > ===> Options unchanged > > tried make clean, but still the same. make show options > shows the options! I had a similar problem, and it turned out that dialog4ports was no longer wo

Re: Commit PR 265028 and PR 265025

Hi! > please commit both PRs for devel/maven and devel/maven-wrapper. All necessary > data is provided in both issues. Done, thanks for the patches. -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372Now what ?

Re: update sysutils/superiotool

Hi! > I've got a patch sitting around for a while, to update > sysutils/superiotool: > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=264018 > > The version we have in the ports tree is really really old. And updating > is actually quite straight forward. > > Can anyone here commit it? Or

Re: archivers/py-borgbackup fixed, can a committer please take a look?

Hi! > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=265060 > > A maintainer fix has been provided since 2022-07-16. This bug breaks the > software completely. It has not yet been committed so a working package can > be built. Done. Sorry for the delay. -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171

Re: sysutils/loki: Bug 266041 still in state new

Hi! > I am the maintainer for sysutils/loki. Since the bump to go119 [1], > which updated all dependencies to go119, the port is broken. > > I am looking for someone to have a look at [2] and commit it. Done. -- p...@freebsd.org +49 171 3101372 Now what ?

Re: comms/limesuite port update 20.10.0 -> 22.09.0.

Hi! > Could anyone with a free moment could take a look at LimeSuite (SDR) > port update please :-) > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=266307 Done, thanks for the patch! -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372Now what ?

Re: Upstream changed released versions from 1.0.2 -> 3025803779 (!)

Hi! > > Recently, upstream change version naming from 1.0.2 -> 3025803779 based on > > CI run id as release tag. > > Which port is this for? deskutils/treesheets -- p...@freebsd.org +49 171 3101372 Now what ?

Re: graphics/darktable40 removal

Hi! > graphics/darktable40 was removed with commit db691c4, but > graphics/Makefile still has a reference to it: > > 5:09pm# grep darktable /usr/ports/graphics/Makefile > SUBDIR += darktable > SUBDIR += darktable40 > > Any committer present to just-fix-it? Done, thanks for the pointe

Re: Unmaintained FreeBSD ports which are out of date

Hi! > > lang/janet | 1.21.2 | > > v1.25.1 > > I submitted an update to lang/janet, please test and comment on the > review at: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D37221 Committed, thanks! -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372Now

Re: Requesting to Maintain Port: simpleirc

Hello, > Hello Ports Team. I would like to assist with maintenance on a port that has > no maintainer. > > The package I'm looking at possibly maintaining is simpleirc > (https://www.freshports.org/irc/simpleirc/). Is there some update / fix that needs to be made for that port ? Then submit a

Re: new port mail/py-offlineimap3

Hi! > Anyone able to commit mail/py-offlineimap3 and its depends. I've been > using it locally for a while (connected to gmail) without issue. > > mail/py-offlineimap3 > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=262233 > > mail/py-rfc6555 > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi

Re: Ports INDEX fails to build correctly

Hi! > the ports' INDEX fails to build correctly: > > $ make index > [...] > --- describe.x11-wm --- > make_index: /usr/ports/devel/py-monkeytype: no entry for > /usr/ports/devel/py-libcst03 > Done. > $ > > The trouble is that there is no devel/py-libcst03 port yet. A (untested) > patch is at

Re: libde265

Hi! > libde265-1.0.9 is vulnerable: > libde265 -- multiple vulnabilities [...] The ports tree has 1.0.11, which was released 3 weeks ago and should fix those. See https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=269382 Some merge to the quarterly ports tree is probably useful. -- p...@free

Re: Possible regression in "make all-depends-list"

Hi! > >> On Thu, Mar 2, 2023 at 6:35 PM Jan Martin Mikkelsen > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> Running “make all-depends-list” on the hs-pandoc port shows none of the > >>> dependencies listed in the USE_CABAL variable in the Makefile. In the > >>> 2022Q2 branch, these dependencies were included. [...]

Re: security updates

Hi! > When Will Xorg and Curl get updated? For curl: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=269967 -- p...@freebsd.org +49 171 3101372 Now what ?

Re: graphics/podofo: 0.10.x requirement

> Hi, > > As the maintainer of the calibre port, while trying to update to 6.18.x > I've discovered that now calibre requires the new API/ABI incompatible > podofo 0.10 version. > > I also guess that other ports will also grow such requirements in the > future. > > So my question, both genera

Re: libreoffice-7.5.4.2 unwind.h:33:3: error: redefinition of enumerator

Hi! > On 8 Jul 2023, at 20:01, Per olof Ljungmark wrote: > > > > Home workstation in preparation for 12- EOL. > > > > After OS update 12.4 -> 13.2 STABLE and reinstalling tons of ports, the > > only remaining problem is libreoffice. > > > > stable/13-cbca92986 > > > > gmake[2]: *** [Makefile

Re: poudriere: Ports a01debe78c6a results in failure: (devel/py-zope.configuration): Error: devel/py-zope.configuration depends on nonexistent origin

Hi! > On our poudriere build hosts poudriere fails out of the blue with the error > shown below. Recently, many zope-related ports were removed: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/dev-commits-ports-all/2023-August/078541.html https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/dev-commits-ports-all/2023-August/

Re: problem with git-pull

Hi! > In short: Is there no way with git to pull only one special port > for a recompilation? For things like that I always have a git ports tree besides the poudriere ports tree. If I need one little recompile, I update the non-poudriere tree, take the one change from that tree that I need, put

Re: security/ca_root_nss: Remove duplicate PLIST entry

Hi! > So what's the process here? > > Contacted committer: no response > Contacted ports mailing list: no technical discussion It looks like it is really a non-trivial topic, so people probably still think about it. > Should I raise a bug ticket for the bug ticket with the patch > that I wrote?

Re: dns/bind916 builds rust unexpectedly

Hi! > Am 2023-09-26 09:44, schrieb Guido Falsi: > > > My poudriere machine rarely can do a build run without rebuilding one > > or more of rust, some version of clang, some version of gcc, > > qt[56]-webengine, py-qt6 (this one does most of the work single > > threaded unluckily). Also it often e

Re: sccache(-overlay) to speed up rust builds in poudriere

Hi! > How is poudriere preventing network access outside the fetch phase? I think by starting the builder jail without IP. -- p...@freebsd.org +49 171 3101372 Now what ?

Re: Port update and consumers bump

Hi! > I'm working on x11-toolkits/wxgtk32 update. > > What's the correct method to do this wotk since it involves bumping > consumers? > Can't find it in Porter's handbook. > > For now I did: > > 1. Update x11-toolkits/wxgtk32 and test build > 2. Build consumers `portgrep -o USE_WX 3.2` > 3. Ru

Re: Seeking guidance on submitting several new Python-based ports

Hi! > Is it reasonable to submit several ports as part of one PR? > For my purposes, there are a handful of "leaf" ports: [...] > So on one extreme, I have to submit each port, one-at-a-time, > in order. On the other extreme, I submit all 12 in one PR. > > How should I go about submitting these n

Re: Seeking guidance on submitting several new Python-based ports

Hi! > > How should I go about submitting these new ports? > > If you add one port per PR and set the proper dependencies in each PR, > it's easy for several committers to work on those ports. All the new ports are added to the tree. I hope I did not miss any. -- p...@freebsd.org +49 17

Re: We need to do something about build times

Hi! > The build times have gone up to the point where they are unsustainable. Yes. Thank you for the great problem statement! -- p...@freebsd.org +49 171 3101372 Now what ?

Re: Commit request for devel/pycharm-devel

Hi! > Is there a spare committer out there who can review and commit/push-back on: > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=276192 Done. -- p...@freebsd.org +49 171 3101372 Now what ?

Re: FreeBSD Port: devel/isa-l

Hi! > There is a new version released for ISA-L > (https://github.com/intel/isa-l/releases/tag/v2.31.0). > Could this port be updated? It fails to build: https://people.freebsd.org/~pi/logs/isa-l-140.txt So if you can provide a patch so that the port builds, it can be updated. Please submit th

Re: FreeBSD ports community is broken

Hi! > Wonderful: Are we now moving to the binary pkg only for mere mortals > then. Unfortunatly, yes. > So when is it going to be possible for a mere mortal like the machine > above to use portmaster or recursive make install since Poudrie is a > machine killer Both options are probably no long

Re: Cannot upgrade p5-DBD-mysql with Mariadb

Hi! > Seems that an upstream change broke compatibility between > databases/p5-DBD-mysql and MariaDB : > > > DBD::mysql requires MySQL 8.x for building. Version reported by > > mysql_config --version: 10.5.23 at ./Makefile.PL line 451, line > > 3. > Since I use MariaDB, I don't want to install m

Re: FreeBSD Port: editors/codelite

Hello, > I would like to step in as maintainer of the editors/codelite port > which is broken. How do I proceed? There is someone who's already working on that. Please have a look at this problem report: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252085 Maybe if you help him with testin

Re: poudriere(8) short circuits my ability to build packages

Hi! > > hint using jail is not it, poudriere > > leverages jails, but we could do without jail while providing the same > > value. > Not if it imposes itself. It does not. The complexity of keeping such a huge number of interdepend ports/packages building and running is not imposed by poudriere,

Re: Taking over net/ndisc6, or adding it to src?

Hi! > I see that net/ndisc6 doesn't have a maintainer. > As a long time user of the tool, I'd be happy to take it over. The way to do this: - create a patch to update it to 1.0.8 - set yourself as maintainer with that patch - submit the patch via bugs.freebsd.org - Post the PR link here > That

Re: Committer request: Here's a new port: sysutils/elfx86exts

Hi! > Please can someone with a bit of spare time commit this new port? > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=277939 Done, thanks! It helps if you already testbuild using poudriere for the usual architectures/releases and if you mention that it built fine. Please do not attach b

Re: PR280824

Hi! > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=280824 > > Can a committer please commit this pr and give maintainer to the > submitter?  I'm AFK for a bit due to surgery. Done. Good luck with your health! -- p...@freebsd.org +49 171 3101372 Now what ?

Re: Newer eclipse port 4.32 (5) - working

Hi! > So after hours of struggling I got a manual installation and a port > installation for eclipse 4.32 on FreeBSD working.  Maybe not everything > is the best solution, but at the end it worked (in a jail) - till the > installation. > > For more detail please have a look on my gtihub repositor

Re: Stopping and restarting poudriere

Hi! > Is it possible to restart a poudriere build session so it picks up > where it left off? I don't think so. -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372Now what ?

Re: www/py-aiohttp vulnerabilities

Hi! > pkg audit complains that > > py37-aiohttp-3.7.4.p0 (www/py-aiohttp) is vulnerable: > > aiohttp -- open redirect vulnerability > > CVE: CVE-2021-21330 > > WWW: > > https://vuxml.FreeBSD.org/freebsd/3000acee-c45d-11eb-904f-14dae9d5a9d2.html > > > > 1 problem(s) found. > > However, AFA

Re: problem building gstreamer1

Hi! > For several weeks, attempts to build gstreamer1 have produced the > appended and a hung-but-killable process. A test-build in poudriere was fine. > This is way above my pay grade. > What have I screwed up? Maybe it's the yacc/bison version you are using ? There's a very

Re: problem building gstreamer1

Hi! > > This is way above my pay grade. > > What have I screwed up? > > Maybe it's the yacc/bison version you are using ? > > There's a very simple message at the end: > > ./grammar.y:799.1-12: warning: deprecated directive: %pure-parser > use %define api.pure > > Have you tried to pat

Re: problem building gstreamer1

Hi! > I've tried this patch on a 14.0-amd64 box. Without it, bison would > crash. With it, gstreamer1 builds fine. > fetch https://people.freebsd.org/~pi/patch-gst-grammar.y The same patch can be found in https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=254326 which describes the same error.

Re: committing 2 ports at same time, commit message not accepted

Hi! > For this port update history: > > security/p5-openxpki*: Update to 3.14.4 > > Is that ok? Yes. -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372Now what ?

Re: Adding functionality to a port

Hello, > I'm wondering what the rules/guidelines are for adding functionality to a > port, that is not in the upstream package. I can't find anything about > this in the porters' documentation. > > Background: > I'm not a porter myself (planning to be one, but that's irrelevant for my > current q

Re: Adding functionality to a port

Hi! > On 14/11/2021 16:34, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > > You can ask the maintainer if he wants to join upstream, but > > if there's no interest, there's no need to pressure one into upstream 8-) > > Don't worry: I don't want to pressure anyone into doing anyth

Re: Adding functionality to a port

Hi! > As a port maintainer, can I just modify the functionality of the ports I > maintain without any limits? Like modifiying a port that does xyz to actually do the reverse ? No, that would be crazy. Upstream and port users would probably freak out, and rightly so. > And as a software develope

Re: Adding functionality to a port

Hi! > It is also not correct to "commandeer" a port to force users on design > choices in conflict with the upstream project. Is there a section in the ports maintainers guide or somewhere else that mandates this ? -- p...@freebsd.org +49 171 3101372 Now what ?

Re: Adding functionality to a port

Hi! > > > It is also not correct to "commandeer" a port to force users on design > > > choices in conflict with the upstream project. > > Is there a section in the ports maintainers guide or somewhere > > else that mandates this ? > Sorry, my fault I did not make me clear maybe, this is all my o

Re: Adding functionality to a port

Hi! > On 14/11/2021 19:37, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > > I agree. The problem is that this is very difficult to codify > > into some policy. > > I've done some digging. And actually, Fedora only needs a few words: > > "All patches should have an upstream bug link o

Re: Adding functionality to a port

Hi! > On 15/11/2021 10:21, Guido Falsi wrote: > > You look too worried by the "functionality added" part. > > Yes, I am worried. Of course I am. > When I first asked my question the day before yesterday, the first > responses were in the line of "port maintainers can do whatever they > want", acc

Re: Bringing back lang/python27 with few modules?

Hi! > We've had many user reports over the last year re the entire situation, > including a number recently about pypy in particular. > > Feel free to reach out to python@ and we'll sort something out together. > > We're on IRC (#freebsd-python @ libera) or you can email me off list and > we can

Re: Bringing back lang/python27 with few modules?

Hi! > How about Tauthon ... a sort-of-maintained fork is better than maintaining > 2.7 on our own. > > https://github.com/naftaliharris/tauthon See the palemoon PR, where this is part of the debate: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251117 -- p...@freebsd.org +49 171 3

Re: Bringing back lang/python27 with few modules?

Hello, > > Removing Iridium was a really bad step. > To all of those that keep complaining that Iridium got removed: > feel free to bring it back and maintain it. They were removed by you because they depended on python 2.7, so has the policy changed ? Can it be brought back ? 2020-12-31 www/ir

Re: Bringing back lang/python27 with few modules?

Hi! > > > > Removing Iridium was a really bad step. > > > To all of those that keep complaining that Iridium got removed: > > > feel free to bring it back and maintain it. > > They were removed by you because they depended on python 2.7, > > so has the policy changed ? Can it be brought back ?

Re: audio/soundtouch broken and unresponsive

Hi! > audio/soundtouch is broken. I have a proposed patch, but have not > heard back from the maintainer in some time. > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=259731 The patch updates to 2.3.1, but as far as I can see, the port is already at 2.3.1. It was updated on the 25 Oct 2021

Re: ports/x11-drivers/xorg-drivers

Hi! > With a 12.2 src & current (well maybe a week old) ports, in > ports/x11-drivers/xorg-drivers/ > I selected all video drivers with options (for some machine testing later) > & with make package hit 2 errors below, > > I dont need those drivers, but others may, > Nice if someone else could

Re: How to contribute

Hi! > I fixed a lot of bugs in my local related to gnome or other ports. I want > to know how can i get @FreeBSD email and make some bug-fix commits. That's a two-step process: 1) Please submit patches via bugs.freebsd.org or reviews.freebsd.org. Some committer will have a look, check and commit

Re: p5-dbd-pg

Hello, [postgres flavors] > This feels like the ideal kind of port that could be flavored so > it works with any installed postgres version. I'm willing to submit > patches, how hard would it be? If it needs to interoperate with php flavors (which it probably does), it's probably a high level of

Re: FreeBSD Port: php80-json

Hi! > Hmm, afrer update to php80 zabbix-frontend don't working.(pkg upgrade) There's this: https://support.zabbix.com/browse/ZBXNEXT-7080 -- p...@freebsd.org +49 171 3101372 Now what ?

Re: FreeBSD Port: php80-json

Hi! > > Hmm, afrer update to php80 zabbix-frontend don't working.(pkg upgrade) > > There's this: > > https://support.zabbix.com/browse/ZBXNEXT-7080 And this: https://www.zabbix.com/documentation/current/en/manual/installation/requirements which says: PHP 7.2.5 or later, but PHP 8.0 is no

Re: PHP73 removed ?

Hi! > I have PHP 7.3 installed and the weekly report shows me an attempt to > upgrade to PHP 7.4, which failed with IGNORE : https://www.php.net/releases/ says that End of Life Dates The most recent branches to reach end of life status are: 7.3: 18 Nov 2021 so that's why it was dropped f

Re: Review/Commit for PR?

Hi! > Are there any committers willing to review/commit: > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=261044 > > It's been stuck at 'New' since 10-Jan-2022. Done. -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372Now what ?

Re: net-mgmt/lldpd: Update to version 1.0.13

Hi! > On the bug report, I attached a patch with the changes to update it to > version 1.0.13, but haven't heard anything back from the maintainer, > while the port is still broken on FreeBSD 13.0. > > Is there anything else that could be done to get the port updated and > the bug fixed? The mai

Re: Committer for PR 260526: xorg-server security update

Hi! > PR 260526 has been idle since January, this is a security update > for the xorg-server. Can I get a committer to look at this? > I think it'd be good to have this addressed before the 2022Q2 > branch creation... Yes, thanks for the patch, done. I'm still struggling with the vuxml entry. So

Re: azure serial console display garbled when accessing through firefox

Hi! > Using firefox (latest) on either freebsd-stable/13 or on linux mint, when > accessing the virtual console on azure, rather than displaying readable > letters and numbers as is usual, the display just shows multi-coloured > icons where each character should be. > > Turning off hardware accel

Re: azure serial console display garbled when accessing through firefox

Hi! > > > Is this a known issue? I'm asking here rather than at firefox because, as > > > I understand it, firefox under linux and firefox under freebsd are very > > > similar. > > > Do I need to raise the issue directly with mozilla? > > > > Yes, and probably with azure as well. > > Thanks - do

Re: Boost ports version

Hi! > The various boost ports (C++ libraries) available are currently on upstream > version 1.72 whereas the current release would be 1.78. > > I'd like to understand whether there is a technical reason for the FreeBSD > ports being "so far behind"? Somewhat, yes. There's a PR for the update:

Re: FreeBSD Port: wx31-gtk3-3.1.5_2

Hello, > 10 days ago wxWidgets-3.1.6 was released. When will there be a corresponding > port update? There is no maintainer for this port. Can you try to submit a patch via bugs.freebsd.org ? -- p...@freebsd.org +49 171 3101372 Now what ?

Re: On what days are the git servers available to obtain the ports tree?

Hi! > I'm a maintainer for well over 100 ports. But more often than > not, I am not permitted to obtain the ports tree from any of > the FreeBSD git servers: > > # git clone -o freebsd --config > remote.freebsd.fetch='+refs/notes/*:refs/notes/*' > https://git.freebsd.org/ports.git PORTS-20220502

Re: Commit PRs 263257 and 263256

Hi! > I am the maintainer of both sysutils/javaservicewrapper > and devel/nexus2-oss. > Can some committer take a look and commit? They now > have been running for me for at least a month without > any problems. Done, thanks for the patches! -- p...@freebsd.org +49 171 3101372

Re: ClamAV security update

Hi! > I see Clamav 0.105.0, 0.104.3 and 0.103.6 were released on May 5th, the > latter two closing "several CVE fixes". > > However, the port was not updated and not even portaudit entries were added. > > Was this overlooked? There's a PR waiting: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi

Re: devel/gindent compile issues on 13.1

Hi! > wondering if I am the only one experiencing compile failure with indent > on the new 13.1 ? I did a testbuild with poudriere and yes, it fails: output.c:843:8: error: variable 'paren_level' set but not used [-Werror,-Wunused-but-set-variable] int paren_level = 0; ^ 1 error gen

Re: java/eclipse port

Hello, thanks very much for your work on eclipse. The update is committed. > It turns out that the cause of the crash was due to the use of a > Linux-only 'feature' to fix a cosmetic bug. In particular: > > https://git.eclipse.org/r/c/platform/eclipse.platform.swt/+/163641/ > > Again, a huge sh

Re: x11/yelp: Always delete by reason of new dependency by poudriere

Hi! > poudriere always deletes and rebuilds x11/yelp. > > [00:01:21] [Dry Run] Deleting yelp-42.1.pkg: new dependency: www/webkit2-gtk4 > > This is due to a wrong LIB_DEPENDS in x11/yelp/Makefile. > www/webkit2-gtk4 needs to be corrected to libwebkit2gtk-5.0.so. > > Could someone fix it? :) Do

Re: x11/yelp: Always delete by reason of new dependency by poudriere

Hi! > Tatsuki Makino wrote on 2022/07/01 18:25: > > poudriere build was also successful (12.3-STABLE amd64). > > It has not succeeded at all :) Sad 8-( So it was: libwebkit2gtk-4.0.so:www/webkit2-gtk4 and should have been libwebkit2gtk-4.0.so:www/webkit2-gtk3 instead of

Re: x11/yelp: Always delete by reason of new dependency by poudriere

Hi! > and should have been > > libwebkit2gtk-4.0.so:www/webkit2-gtk3 I'm testbuilding it right now with that change. -- p...@freebsd.org +49 171 3101372 Now what ?

Re: Incompatibility between two python ports

Hi! > Just updated my port tree this morning and ran into an issue : > > py311-rdflib requires py311-html5lib-modern-1.2 > while py311-beautifulsoup requires py311-html5lib > > both html5lib are incompatible (installs files at the same place) > > No options available for both ports > > How can

Re: Please shed some wisdom on how autogen/autoconf works? Also, how to build a port from github.

Hi! > 1) Does the ports tree magically tweak CFLAGS or whatever when you build a > port, to include things like /usr/local/include and /usr/local/lib? Yes. If you run a port-build and log the build, you'll see many calls like this: libtool: compile: cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../config -D_RE

Re: rules for ports maintained by perl@

Hi! > What are rules behind ports maintained by perl@ ? See https://wiki.freebsd.org/Perl, there are some things mentioned. > Is it allowed to submit PRs related to these ports? Yes. > Or perl@ members do all the job by themselves? No. > Who members of perl@ group? https://wiki.freebsd.org/

Re: security/nss fails to build

> > Can you give me a hint where I can read more about this > > construct '-iquote ./mpi' ? > > Only because it's you! ;) > > From man 1 gcc13: > > -iquote dir Aha, I searched in 'man 1 cc', which comes from clang, and that page does not mention this option. And: There was no gcc installed

Re: security/nss fails to build

Hi! > I have a PR for this since November: > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=282826 Can you give me a hint where I can read more about this construct '-iquote ./mpi' ? -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372Now what ?

Re: Will there be a 'php84-pecl-mongodb' package released?

Hi! > Will there be a ‘php84-pecl-mongodb’ package released? I maintain a > public-facing application for the Meredith Public Library > (https://www.meredithlibrary.org/) using it, and am concerned about upgrading > it to PHP 8.4 when PHP 8.3 is retired. I'll have a look. -- p...@freebsd.org

Re: Will there be a 'php84-pecl-mongodb' package released?

Hi! > If my memory serves me right 1.17 and later versions do support php 8.4. https://www.mongodb.com/docs/drivers/php-drivers/ has a table that confirms this. -- p...@freebsd.org +49 171 3101372 Now what ?