Re: www/chromium build failure on 14-STABLE

2025-03-23 Thread David Wolfskill
On Sun, Mar 23, 2025 at 10:15:03PM +, Jonathan Chen wrote: > Hi, > > Building www/chromium 134.0.6998.165 on my 14-STABLE/amd64 currently fails > with: > > ../../third_party/webrtc/modules/video_capture/linux/pipewire_session.cc:90:3: > error: no matching function for call to 'pw_node_add_l

FYI: An oddity for poudriere-devel use for pkgbase METHOD vs., say, null METHOD, is the ARCH naming used; man 8 poudriere-jail does no document such detail

2025-03-23 Thread Mark Millard
Note the variability in the ARCH columns naming conventions: # poudriere jail -l JAILNAME VERSION OSVERSION ARCH METHOD TIMESTAMP PATH release-aarch64 14.2-RELEASE-p1 aarch64 pkgbase 2025-03-12 21:11:39 /usr/local/poudriere/jails/release-aarch

www/chromium build failure on 14-STABLE

2025-03-23 Thread Jonathan Chen
Hi, Building www/chromium 134.0.6998.165 on my 14-STABLE/amd64 currently fails with: ../../third_party/webrtc/modules/video_capture/linux/pipewire_session.cc:90:3: error: no matching function for call to 'pw_node_add_listener' 90 | pw_node_add_listener(proxy_, &node_listener_, &node_events,

www/Makefile errors

2025-03-23 Thread Jonathan Chen
Hi, The recent removal of www/sogo-activesync also needs to have the SUBDIR+=www/sogo-activesync line removed from www/Makefile. Its presence breaks INDEX generation. Cheers -- Jonathan Chen

Re: www/chromium build failure on 14-STABLE

2025-03-23 Thread Gleb Popov
On Mon, Mar 24, 2025 at 1:15 AM Jonathan Chen wrote: > > Hi, > > Building www/chromium 134.0.6998.165 on my 14-STABLE/amd64 currently fails > with: > > ../../third_party/webrtc/modules/video_capture/linux/pipewire_session.cc:90:3: > error: no matching function for call to 'pw_node_add_listener'

Re: www/chromium build failure on 14-STABLE

2025-03-23 Thread Robert Nagy
I've committed the fix. On 24/03/25 08:16 +0900, Tomoaki AOKI wrote: > +1. > As it seems to be a Pipewire-related function, I'm thinking about > rebuilding Chromium with PIPEWIRE option disabled, but would need > a plenty of time as usual. > Now I strongly want a computer for building that chan bu