Hi Mark,
Am Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 08:08:43PM -0800 schrieb Mark Millard:
> https://pkg-status.freebsd.org/ampere1/build.html?mastername=141releng-armv7-quarterly&build=525876c27745
>
> shows that the build of octave-forge-20241116 has been stuck for 34:28:33,
> only having reached the status run-d
(...)
pkg 2.0.6 doesn't solve issue with go:
testport 2 times on net/speedtest-go
[00:00:03] [01] [00:00:00] Inspecting ports-mgmt/pkg | pkg-2.0.6:
determining shlib requirements
[00:00:03] [01] [00:00:00] Inspecting lang/go121 | go121-1.21.13_1:
determining shlib requirements
[00:00:03] [01] [0
Hi Mark,
Am Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 12:01:10PM -0800 schrieb Mark Millard:
> It did finish --after 39:49:02 .
>
> As long as the O(n²) build-time problem exists: Is the
> package's build worth the delays to most other package
> builds that are done on on any specific builder machine?
>
> ampere1 cy
Hello Robert,
On Feb 11, 2025, at 13:13, Robert Clausecker wrote:
> Am Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 12:01:10PM -0800 schrieb Mark Millard:
>> It did finish --after 39:49:02 .
>>
>> As long as the O(n²) build-time problem exists: Is the
>> package's build worth the delays to most other package
>> builds
Dear port maintainers,
The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more
unmaintained ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity
to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. Please consider also adopting this po
I'm porting a PHP applicaton that, when fully installed, is actually 10
different components: the main application and 9 dependencies installed
using Composer. To make the user's life easier, I want to distribute a
tarball of the vendor files. Easy enough, but now I have to disclose
all the l
Hi,
Can you see Porter's Handbook 5.8.7 LICENSE_DISTFILES and
LICENSE_DISTFILES_NAME.
If you have multiple distribution files, then this maybe work for you.
Example 38. LICENSE_DISTFILES
Used when the distribution files do not all have the same license. For
example, one has a code
license, and
Hello Robert and Philip,
Philip: This note indicates that the build does eventually finish.
So it is not a "need too kill the buildler" context.
On Feb 11, 2025, at 03:20, Robert Clausecker wrote:
> Am Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 08:08:43PM -0800 schrieb Mark Millard:
>> https://pkg-status.freebsd.org
On 2025-02-11 11:48, Yusuf Yaman wrote:
Can you see Porter's Handbook 5.8.7 LICENSE_DISTFILES and
LICENSE_DISTFILES_NAME.
If you have multiple distribution files, then this maybe work for you.
Example 38. LICENSE_DISTFILES
Used when the distribution files do not all have the same license. For
e
Sorry but I didn't understand what you are trying to do properly but is
it an option to make a port for every dependency?
On 2/11/25 23:20, list_free...@bluerosetech.com wrote:
> On 2025-02-11 11:48, Yusuf Yaman wrote:
>> Can you see Porter's Handbook 5.8.7 LICENSE_DISTFILES and
>> LICENSE_DISTFI
Hi Mark,
Am Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 02:15:38PM -0800 schrieb Mark Millard:
> >> Should the package be considered broken for armv7 until
> >> it is fixed to build in a normal time frame instead of
> >> an O(n²) tiem frame, just because it takes too long as
> >> stands?
> >
> > Yes, please mark it as
On 2025-02-11 12:32, Yusuf Yaman wrote:
Sorry but I didn't understand what you are trying to do properly but is
it an option to make a port for every dependency?
Composer-managed dependencies are, to use compiler parlance,
static-linked when the main application is compiled. Assuming they're
Van: list_free...@bluerosetech.com
Datum: 11 februari 2025 20:44
Aan: freebsd-po...@freebsd.org
Onderwerp: How do I specify and attribute multiple licenses?
I'm porting a PHP applicaton that, when fully installed, is actually 10
different components: the main application and 9 dependencies in
13 matches
Mail list logo
