Hello Mark!
Note: I do not know why, but aarch64 does not get MULTILIB to
> also span armv7 (aarch32). So aarch64 might not have this
> problem being visible as stands.
I confirm that aarch64 doesn't have this problem.
main-n275011-dbedcc169f70
poudriere-devel
PKG_NO_VERSION_FOR_DEPS=yes
`pkg
Hello.
The following two lines exist in INDEX-*.
tdb-1.4.9,1|/usr/ports/databases/tdb|/usr/local|Trivial
Database|/usr/ports/dat...
tdb-1.4.10,1|/usr/ports/databases/tdb1410|/usr/local|Trivial
Database|/usr/port...
I haven't checked which one takes precedence, but I guess it's bad that
packa
On 01/02/25 22:56, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Sat 01 Feb 22:40, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Fri 31 Jan 19:13, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Fri 31 Jan 18:18, Guido Falsi wrote:
On 27/01/25 10:56, Nuno Teixeira wrote:
Hello Rainer,
> Wouldn't this be the right time to get Bapt@ involved?
On 01/02/25 16:24, Mark Millard wrote:
On Feb 1, 2025, at 03:04, Nuno Teixeira wrote:
Hello Mark!
Note: I do not know why, but aarch64 does not get MULTILIB to
also span armv7 (aarch32). So aarch64 might not have this
problem being visible as stands.
I confirm that aarch64 doesn't have this
On Sat 01 Feb 22:40, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Fri 31 Jan 19:13, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > On Fri 31 Jan 18:18, Guido Falsi wrote:
> > > On 27/01/25 10:56, Nuno Teixeira wrote:
> > > > Hello Rainer,
> > > >
> > > > > Wouldn't this be the right time to get Bapt@ involved? After all, he
>
On Feb 1, 2025, at 03:04, Nuno Teixeira wrote:
> Hello Mark!
>
> Note: I do not know why, but aarch64 does not get MULTILIB to
> also span armv7 (aarch32). So aarch64 might not have this
> problem being visible as stands.
>
> I confirm that aarch64 doesn't have this problem.
This suggests the
On Feb 1, 2025, at 07:52, Guido Falsi wrote:
> On 01/02/25 16:24, Mark Millard wrote:
>> On Feb 1, 2025, at 03:04, Nuno Teixeira wrote:
>>> Hello Mark!
>>>
>>> Note: I do not know why, but aarch64 does not get MULTILIB to
>>> also span armv7 (aarch32). So aarch64 might not have this
>>> problem
Hello,
I am trying to port a third-party Signal messaging app which has buil
dependency on devel/blueprint-compiler and the port builds fine but i am
getting build_fs_violation error in poudriere testport even though I
have that PYTHONDONTWRITEBYTECODE=1 set in MAKE_ENV variable in
Makefile. H
On Fri 31 Jan 19:13, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Fri 31 Jan 18:18, Guido Falsi wrote:
> > On 27/01/25 10:56, Nuno Teixeira wrote:
> > > Hello Rainer,
> > >
> > > > Wouldn't this be the right time to get Bapt@ involved? After all, he
> > > has
> > > > worked intensively on the pkg updates.
>
Dear port maintainers,
The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more
unmaintained ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity
to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. Please consider also adopting this po
Guido Falsi wrote on
Date: Sat, 01 Feb 2025 22:36:12 UTC :
> On 01/02/25 22:56, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > . . .
>>> 32bits libs, they are actually needed. for reported ports, I think the
>>> PKG_NO_VERSION_FOR_DEPS=yes does not work yet with newer pkg version.
> > And I was wrong about the
For several days 'pkg version reports that all three of the ports are old:
talloc-2.4.1 < needs updating (index has 2.4.2)
tdb-1.4.9,1< needs updating (index has 1.4.10,1)
tevent-0.15.0 < needs updating (index has 0.16.1)
How
12 matches
Mail list logo
