Re: port binary dumping core on recent head in poudriere

2024-11-25 Thread Guido Falsi
On 25/11/24 09:17, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: Dimitry Andric writes: Probably best to create a bugzilla ticket, but as I said before, I cannot reproduce this. I can. My builder is running 15 and sees segfaults while building packages for 14 and 15 but not for 13. Interesting. Luckily every

Re: port binary dumping core on recent head in poudriere

2024-11-25 Thread Mark Millard
On Nov 25, 2024, at 12:41, Guido Falsi wrote: > On 25/11/24 09:17, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: >> Dimitry Andric writes: >>> Probably best to create a bugzilla ticket, but as I said before, I >>> cannot reproduce this. >> I can. My builder is running 15 and sees segfaults while building >> packa

Re: port binary dumping core on recent head in poudriere

2024-11-25 Thread Dag-Erling Smørgrav
Mark Millard writes: > Guido Falsi writes: >> On 25/11/24 09:17, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: >>> Dimitry Andric writes: Probably best to create a bugzilla ticket, but as I said before, I cannot reproduce this. >>> I can. My builder is running 15 and sees segfaults while building >>> pa

Re: port binary dumping core on recent head in poudriere

2024-11-25 Thread Tatsuki Makino
Hello. (I don't subscribe to the current mailing list, so I don't send it there.) If changing the CPUTYPE changes the occurrence of the problem, is there -Wl,--as-needed involved? Not so long ago, Firefox used libraries loaded by other binaries, but that stopped working. As an example, recently

Re: port binary dumping core on recent head in poudriere

2024-11-25 Thread Guido Falsi
On 25/11/24 22:18, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: Mark Millard writes: Guido Falsi writes: On 25/11/24 09:17, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: Dimitry Andric writes: Probably best to create a bugzilla ticket, but as I said before, I cannot reproduce this. I can. My builder is running 15 and sees s

Re: port binary dumping core on recent head in poudriere

2024-11-25 Thread Mark Millard
On Nov 25, 2024, at 13:27, Guido Falsi wrote: > On 25/11/24 22:18, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: >> Mark Millard writes: >>> Guido Falsi writes: On 25/11/24 09:17, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: > Dimitry Andric writes: >> Probably best to create a bugzilla ticket, but as I said before,

Re: port binary dumping core on recent head in poudriere

2024-11-25 Thread Dimitry Andric
On 25 Nov 2024, at 23:12, Mark Millard wrote: > > On Nov 25, 2024, at 13:27, Guido Falsi wrote: > >> On 25/11/24 22:18, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: >>> Mark Millard writes: Guido Falsi writes: > On 25/11/24 09:17, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: >> Dimitry Andric writes: >>> Proba

Re: port binary dumping core on recent head in poudriere

2024-11-25 Thread Dag-Erling Smørgrav
Dimitry Andric writes: > Probably best to create a bugzilla ticket, but as I said before, I > cannot reproduce this. I can. My builder is running 15 and sees segfaults while building packages for 14 and 15 but not for 13. % uname -a FreeBSD pkg.des.dev 15.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 15.0-CURRENT #0 main-

Re: port binary dumping core on recent head in poudriere

2024-11-25 Thread Guido Falsi
On 26/11/24 03:05, Mark Millard wrote: Top posting going in a different direction that established a way to control the behavior in my context . . . I changed USE_TMPFS=all to USE_TMPFS=no : USE_TMPFS=all gets the failure vs. USE_TMPFS=no works just fine So it is a FreeBSD system error associa

Re: port binary dumping core on recent head in poudriere [tmpfs corruptions involving blocks of zeros that should not be all zeros]

2024-11-25 Thread Mark Millard
On Nov 25, 2024, at 18:05, Mark Millard wrote: > Top posting going in a different direction that > established a way to control the behavior in my > context . . . For folks new to the discoveries: the context here is poudriere bulk builds, for USE_TMPFS=all vs. USE_TMPFS=no . My test context is

Re: port binary dumping core on recent head in poudriere

2024-11-25 Thread Mark Millard
On Nov 25, 2024, at 14:23, Guido Falsi wrote: > On 25/11/24 23:15, Dimitry Andric wrote: >> On 25 Nov 2024, at 23:12, Mark Millard wrote: >>> >>> On Nov 25, 2024, at 13:27, Guido Falsi wrote: >>> On 25/11/24 22:18, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: > Mark Millard writes: >> Guido Falsi

Re: port binary dumping core on recent head in poudriere

2024-11-25 Thread Yasuhiro Kimura
From: Dimitry Andric Subject: Re: port binary dumping core on recent head in poudriere Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2024 23:15:20 +0100 > On 25 Nov 2024, at 23:12, Mark Millard wrote: >> >> On Nov 25, 2024, at 13:27, Guido Falsi wrote: >> >>> On 25/11/24 22:18, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: Mark Milla

Re: port binary dumping core on recent head in poudriere

2024-11-25 Thread Mark Millard
On Nov 25, 2024, at 15:21, Mark Millard wrote: > On Nov 25, 2024, at 14:23, Guido Falsi wrote: > >> On 25/11/24 23:15, Dimitry Andric wrote: >>> On 25 Nov 2024, at 23:12, Mark Millard wrote: On Nov 25, 2024, at 13:27, Guido Falsi wrote: > On 25/11/24 22:18, Dag-Erling Smø

Re: port binary dumping core on recent head in poudriere

2024-11-25 Thread Guido Falsi
On 25/11/24 23:15, Dimitry Andric wrote: On 25 Nov 2024, at 23:12, Mark Millard wrote: On Nov 25, 2024, at 13:27, Guido Falsi wrote: On 25/11/24 22:18, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: Mark Millard writes: Guido Falsi writes: On 25/11/24 09:17, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: Dimitry Andric wri

Re: port binary dumping core on recent head in poudriere

2024-11-25 Thread Mark Millard
Top posting going in a different direction that established a way to control the behavior in my context . . . I changed USE_TMPFS=all to USE_TMPFS=no : USE_TMPFS=all gets the failure vs. USE_TMPFS=no works just fine So it is a FreeBSD system error associated with use of tmpfs . Now back to wha

Unmaintained FreeBSD ports which are out of date

2024-11-25 Thread portscout
Dear port maintainers, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more unmaintained ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. Please consider also adopting this po