Possible precedence issue with control flow operator at
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/IO/Socket/SSL.pm line 2599.
Possible precedence issue with control flow operator at
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/IO/Socket/SSL.pm line 2599.
Possible precedence issue with control flow operator at
/usr/local
No longer is the problem only observed on ampere2! But this was with
a non-debug, personally built kernel that has some of my now patches.
I'll see if I can replicate the issue with an official pkgbase debug
kernel.
FYI for the replication that I got:
/usr/local/sbin/pkg-static add -A /packages/
On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 12:41:10PM -0500, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> Possible precedence issue with control flow operator at
> /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/IO/Socket/SSL.pm line 2599.
It looks like you have encountered a warning that has been silenced in
version 2.088 of IO::Socket::SSL:
https://gi
On 07/16/2024 12:53 pm, Tom Hukins wrote:
On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 12:41:10PM -0500, Larry Rosenman wrote:
Possible precedence issue with control flow operator at
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/IO/Socket/SSL.pm line 2599.
It looks like you have encountered a warning that has been silenced in
ve
On Jul 16, 2024, at 10:42, Mark Millard wrote:
> No longer is the problem only observed on ampere2! But this was with
> a non-debug, personally built kernel that has some of my now patches.
> I'll see if I can replicate the issue with an official pkgbase debug
> kernel.
It replicated with the of
[I CC'd Bryan D. in case this is related to the
failed rm activity tied to disamounts that are
not happening first. I had reported on an example.]
I got the following from poudriere-devel activity
on a system running a pkgbase main debug kernel.
Note that nullfs_unmount and null_lock are also
invo
On Jul 16, 2024, at 11:37, Mark Millard wrote:
> On Jul 16, 2024, at 10:42, Mark Millard wrote:
>
>> No longer is the problem only observed on ampere2! But this was with
>> a non-debug, personally built kernel that has some of my now patches.
>> I'll see if I can replicate the issue with an off
Dear port maintainers,
The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more
unmaintained ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity
to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. Please consider also adopting this po
On Jul 16, 2024, at 18:41, Mark Millard wrote:
> On Jul 16, 2024, at 11:37, Mark Millard wrote:
>
>> On Jul 16, 2024, at 10:42, Mark Millard wrote:
>>
>>> No longer is the problem only observed on ampere2! But this was with
>>> a non-debug, personally built kernel that has some of my now patc
