On 25/06/2024 09:39, Harry Schmalzbauer wrote:
Revert "Framework: Introduce bsd.sponsor.mk"
This reverts commit 274cd4df4dcce0a9aa78da47bb6e35ab3dbcbf8c
See also: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D44487
> In D44487#1014651, @mat wrote:
>>
>> but we want users to stop using ports and u
> On 25. Jun 2024, at 10:21, Miroslav Lachman <000.f...@quip.cz> wrote:
>
> Pushing people to use packages sounds comical. Are we really talking about
> those packages that are not built at all, like Signal Desktop and many others?
The over-reliance on Poudriere has been going on for a decade
Jun 25, 2024, 07:39 by free...@omnilan.de:
>> Revert "Framework: Introduce bsd.sponsor.mk"
>>
>> This reverts commit 274cd4df4dcce0a9aa78da47bb6e35ab3dbcbf8c
>>
>
>
> See also: > https://reviews.freebsd.org/D44487
>
> > In D44487#1014651, @mat wrote:
>
>>>
>>>
> >> but we want users to st
Franco Fichtner wrote:
> I also agree that ports should be for ports building. The makefile framework
> is very good. Why risk it by wedging packages over ports?
I know this isn't proposed, but if, hypothetically, packages becomes the
only option, I'll be switching to manually installing from t
Dear port maintainers,
The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more
unmaintained ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity
to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. Please consider also adopting this po
