typo in mailwrapper manpage?

2024-04-14 Thread bob prohaska
While trying to fix mail rejection errors from grmail when using sendmail I noticed that the man page for mailwrapper ends with: FreeBSD 14.0-RELEASE-p5October 29, 2014FreeBSD 14.0-RELEASE-p5 Looks like there's a typo somewhere on that line. Thanks for reading, bob prohaska

Re: typo in mailwrapper manpage?

2024-04-14 Thread LuMiWa
On Sun, 14 Apr 2024 10:51:53 -0700 bob prohaska wrote: > While trying to fix mail rejection errors from grmail when using > sendmail I noticed that the man page for mailwrapper ends with: > > FreeBSD 14.0-RELEASE-p5October 29, 2014FreeBSD > 14.0-RELEASE-p5 > > Looks like there's

Unable to compile signal-desktop

2024-04-14 Thread Danny
Hello, I've been trying to compile signal-desktop from the ports (as the latest packages don't seem to exist) but I've been unable to. Issue so far appear to be with "/usr/ports/net-im/libsignal-node": - yarn install v1.22.19 [1/4] Resolving packages... [2/4] Fetching packages... error Can'

Re: typo in mailwrapper manpage?

2024-04-14 Thread bob prohaska
On Sun, Apr 14, 2024 at 03:51:37PM -0400, LuMiWa wrote: > On Sun, 14 Apr 2024 10:51:53 -0700 > bob prohaska wrote: > > > While trying to fix mail rejection errors from grmail when using > > sendmail I noticed that the man page for mailwrapper ends with: > > > > FreeBSD 14.0-RELEASE-p5Oct

Re: typo in mailwrapper manpage?

2024-04-14 Thread Tatsuki Makino
Hello. bob prohaska wrote on 2024/04/15 08:02: > The typo I had in mind was in the line > FreeBSD 14.0-RELEASE-p5October 29, 2014FreeBSD > ^ Does that mean this year is 2024? This manpage is just brought over from NetBSD (or OpenBSD), w

Unmaintained FreeBSD ports which are out of date

2024-04-14 Thread portscout
Dear port maintainers, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more unmaintained ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. Please consider also adopting this po

Re: Package a second port (gitlab-ee instead of gitlab-ce)

2024-04-14 Thread Matthias Fechner
Am 12.04.2024 um 19:47 schrieb Gleb Popov: The ${FLAVOR:U...} expression looks a bit weird to me. You have FLAVOR?= ... in your Makefile, so this var can't really be undefined thanks a lot for your time having a look to it. You are right, it has as default ce defined. I simplified it now with: