Am 12.04.2024 um 09:17 schrieb Gleb Popov:
- GL_PROJECT= gitlab-foos
+ GL_PROJECT= gitlab
part makes it use a completely different distfile.
The problem is best solved by using FLAVORS, I guess. See
https://docs.freebsd.org/en/books/porters-handbook/book/#flavors
thanks a lot for this.
I have
Mathieu Arnold wrote on 2024/04/12 15:53:
> No, no, you should not do that,
:)
It is difficult to prioritize when there are two methods, WITH_*_PORTS and
WITHOUT_*_PORTS.
Perhaps we have experienced even something like "Order allow,deny Allow from
... Deny from ..." :)
I wondered if a new variab
The porters handbook says:
> Make sure that make package can be run as a normal user (that is, not
> as root)
However, the default `PREFIX` is /usr/local, and a non-root user cannot
install to this folder.
Adjusting the PREFIX kind of fixes it (partially) but not fully, so I
don't know if there'
On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 11:48:16PM -0700, Chris wrote:
> I'm doing a full sweep of ports missing LICENSE and I continue
> to have to jump through additional hurdles to represent the
> BSD 1-Clause License in ports that use it. This has been puzzling
> be for some time. So I'm asking. Why isn't it r
On 2024-04-12 09:25, Brooks Davis wrote:
On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 11:48:16PM -0700, Chris wrote:
I'm doing a full sweep of ports missing LICENSE and I continue
to have to jump through additional hurdles to represent the
BSD 1-Clause License in ports that use it. This has been puzzling
be for some
On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 10:56 AM Matthias Fechner wrote:
>
> https://gitlab.fechner.net/mfechner/Gitlab/-/commit/c6e569cdcd2862fdffa05a73c9ebd8a5a78fa7a7
The ${FLAVOR:U...} expression looks a bit weird to me. You have
FLAVOR?= ... in your Makefile, so this var can't really be undefined
> But if
On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 7:22 PM Matthew Phillips
wrote:
>
> The porters handbook says:
>
> > Make sure that make package can be run as a normal user (that is, not
> > as root)
>
> However, the default `PREFIX` is /usr/local, and a non-root user cannot
> install to this folder.
`make package` only
On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 07:49:02PM +0300, Gleb Popov wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 7:22 PM Matthew Phillips
> wrote:
> >
> > The porters handbook says:
> >
> > > Make sure that make package can be run as a normal user (that is, not
> > > as root)
> >
> > However, the default `PREFIX` is /usr/lo
Matthew Phillips:
> It definitely is attempting to install in the port I'm working on. The
> port's Makefile does not do so when just running `make`. Do you have any
> idea why make package would be trying to install?
is it trying to install the port itself, or its dependencies?
it will always tr
On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 06:22:17PM +0100, Lexi Winter wrote:
> Matthew Phillips:
> > It definitely is attempting to install in the port I'm working on. The
> > port's Makefile does not do so when just running `make`. Do you have any
> > idea why make package would be trying to install?
>
> is it t
On 2024/04/12 13:28, Matthew Phillips wrote:
It's trying to install the port itself. To /usr/local/bin specifically.
It seems like it's running `make install` on the ports Makefile.
From man ports(7): "package Make a binary package for the port. The
port will be installed if it has not alr
On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 03:06:16PM -0400, Kurt Hackenberg wrote:
> On 2024/04/12 13:28, Matthew Phillips wrote:
>
> > It's trying to install the port itself. To /usr/local/bin specifically.
> > It seems like it's running `make install` on the ports Makefile.
>
> From man ports(7): "package Make
On 2024/04/12 15:16, Matthew Phillips wrote:
From man ports(7): "package Make a binary package for the port. The port
will be installed if it has not already been."
I think you want "make build", also documented in that man page.
Thank you Kurt. Does that mean that the porters handbook
Kurt Hackenberg writes:
> Matthew Phillips writes:
> > It's trying to install the port itself. To /usr/local/bin specifically.
> > It seems like it's running `make install` on the ports Makefile.
> From man ports(7): "package Make a binary package for the port. The
> port will be installed if
On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 09:30:14PM +0200, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> Kurt Hackenberg writes:
> > Matthew Phillips writes:
> > > It's trying to install the port itself. To /usr/local/bin specifically.
> > > It seems like it's running `make install` on the ports Makefile.
> > From man ports(7): "
On 2024-04-12 12:50, Matthew Phillips wrote:
On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 09:30:14PM +0200, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
Kurt Hackenberg writes:
> Matthew Phillips writes:
> > It's trying to install the port itself. To /usr/local/bin specifically.
> > It seems like it's running `make install` on the
On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 12:57:41PM -0700, Chris wrote:
> On 2024-04-12 12:50, Matthew Phillips wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 09:30:14PM +0200, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> > > Kurt Hackenberg writes:
> > > > Matthew Phillips writes:
> > > > > It's trying to install the port itself. To /usr/l
On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 10:50 PM Matthew Phillips
wrote:
> install -m 755 snac $(DESTDIR)$(PREFIX)/bin/snac
>
> Does that sound right?
Sounds right to me.
On 2024-04-12 13:03, Matthew Phillips wrote:
On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 12:57:41PM -0700, Chris wrote:
On 2024-04-12 12:50, Matthew Phillips wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 09:30:14PM +0200, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> > Kurt Hackenberg writes:
> > > Matthew Phillips writes:
> > > > It's trying
Dear port maintainers,
The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more
unmaintained ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity
to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. Please consider also adopting this po
20 matches
Mail list logo
