On 2024-04-10 10:16, Chris wrote:
On 2024-04-10 07:08, Brad D wrote:
I’m still pretty fresh to porting here and was given feedback about some
security
and build concerns. I’ll be redoing my port and doing more testing (don’t
mind
iterating and improving especially when my reviewer was very kind
Gleb Popov wrote on 2024/04/11 15:51:
> Would like me to fix it or you'll do that yourself?
Fixing this could conceivably break the functionality added in
d697653cffd19ddaf3cdee2589a830c72ab39777, so it is better to fix it carefully
or leave it alone.
There is a workaround on my part.
make -C /
Snac is an ActivityPub instance, source URL is below. I searched
Bugzilla and couldn't find anything where someone was working on it.
I'm willing to maintain a port but thought I'd check first to see if
anyone else had taken it on before I started. Should be fairly
straightforward.
https://codeber
Should be fixed now by
https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/ports/commit/?id=665b0219e541019b849fd5a1efdf032081dcf610
Gleb Popov wrote on 2024/04/12 02:57:
> Should be fixed now by
> https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/ports/commit/?id=665b0219e541019b849fd5a1efdf032081dcf610
Thank you very much.
This would mean that there is more support for the use of _WITH_${feature} and
_WITHOUT_${feature} in the future.
It is expecte
Dear port maintainers,
The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more
unmaintained ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity
to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. Please consider also adopting this po
Dear all,
I maintain the www/gitlab-ce port and would like to make also a
www/gitlab-ee port available.
The ee port only needs another distfile and some very small
modifications in the FreeBSD Makefile.
Is a slave port here an option?
Or should I use another technique (maybe just include the
On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 7:54 AM Matthias Fechner wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> I maintain the www/gitlab-ce port and would like to make also a
> www/gitlab-ee port available.
> The ee port only needs another distfile and some very small
> modifications in the FreeBSD Makefile.
>
> Is a slave port here
I'm doing a full sweep of ports missing LICENSE and I continue
to have to jump through additional hurdles to represent the
BSD 1-Clause License in ports that use it. This has been puzzling
be for some time. So I'm asking. Why isn't it represented in
Mk/bsdlicenses.db.mk along with all the other BS
On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 06:31:45AM +0900, Tatsuki Makino wrote:
> Gleb Popov wrote on 2024/04/12 02:57:
> > Should be fixed now by
> > https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/ports/commit/?id=665b0219e541019b849fd5a1efdf032081dcf610
>
> Thank you very much.
>
> This would mean that there is more support for the
10 matches
Mail list logo
