Hello,
It was said to me that the main way to contribute is via bugzilla. So last
year, I wrote tickets 270798, 273569, 273568 and got no response since. On
github, repo freebsd-ports, I have pull-request 241 which I think will have
a similar fate as the bugzilla tickets. I do realize that the git
> On Mar 11, 2024, at 11:18 AM, Adam Labus wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> It was said to me that the main way to contribute is via bugzilla. So last
> year, I wrote tickets 270798, 273569, 273568 and got no response since. On
> github, repo freebsd-ports, I have pull-request 241 which I think will ha
Hello,
Could someone please commit bug 277299?
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=277299
It is an update to Logitech Media Server and it would be good to have
this updated since the "mysqueezebox.com" service for these devices is
going down in March. This is the latest version tha
On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 1:27 PM Moin Rahman wrote:
>
> Github PRs are mostly ignored as those cannot be merged there.
Not really, there is a lot of stuff coming from GitHub. Yes, you can't
merge them via web UI, but it is still simple with gh CLI. I do merge
contributions from GitHub from time to
> On Mar 11, 2024, at 1:37 PM, Gleb Popov wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 1:27 PM Moin Rahman wrote:
>>
>> Github PRs are mostly ignored as those cannot be merged there.
>
> Not really, there is a lot of stuff coming from GitHub. Yes, you can't
> merge them via web UI, but it is still sim
Hi,
On Mon, 11 Mar 2024, at 11:27, Moin Rahman wrote:
> 2. After creating the PR send a mail in this list which attracts more
> attention. Or jump into the IRC channel to ask someone to look into it.
According to this rule, the process actually is duplicate here every PR.
Because this rules has
> On Mar 11, 2024, at 2:28 PM, Denis Shaposhnikov wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 11 Mar 2024, at 11:27, Moin Rahman wrote:
>> 2. After creating the PR send a mail in this list which attracts more
>> attention. Or jump into the IRC channel to ask someone to look into it.
>
> According to this rule
On 11/03/24 12:48, Trenton Schulz wrote:
Hello,
Could someone please commit bug 277299?
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=277299
It is an update to Logitech Media Server and it would be good to have
this updated since the "mysqueezebox.com" service for these devices is
going do
[The armv7 poudriere bulk finished.]
On Mar 10, 2024, at 13:10, Mark Millard wrote:
> [poudriere bulk status update.]
>
> On Mar 5, 2024, at 18:43, Mark Millard wrote:
>
>> [I noticed that my SWAP figures were not self consistent for the armv7.]
>>
>> On Feb 18, 2024, at 09:50, Mark Millard
I had absolutely no success with running poudriere under qemu emulation.
There are always a bunch of packages that failed to build for various
changing reasons.
Running poudriere on an Apple Silicon Mac works really well, though. Not
one failed package so far and much faster than under emulation,
11.03.2024 4:49, Daniel Engberg wrote:
>>> Ports can be removed immediately if one of the following conditions is met:
>>>
>>> - Upstream distfile is no longer available from the original source/mirror
>>> (Our and other distcaches e.g. Debian, Gentoo, etc do not count as
>>> "available")
>>
Is it known who is the contact person for portsfallout.com ?
Thanks,
Yuri
[I should have noted howthe processor frequency is heandled.]
> On Mar 11, 2024, at 08:50, Mark Millard wrote:
>
> [The armv7 poudriere bulk finished.]
>
> On Mar 10, 2024, at 13:10, Mark Millard wrote:
>
>> [poudriere bulk status update.]
>>
>> On Mar 5, 2024, at 18:43, Mark Millard wrote:
On 2/28/24 11:22, Florian Smeets wrote:
Ports can be removed immediately if one of the following conditions is
met:
- Upstream distfile is no longer available from the original
source/mirror (Our and other distcaches e.g. Debian, Gentoo, etc do
not count as "available")
Such removal can't
On 2024-03-11T18:22:57.000+01:00, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> 11.03.2024 4:49, Daniel Engberg wrote:
>
>
> >
> > >
> > > > Ports can be removed immediately if one of the following conditions
> > > > is met:
> > > >
> > > > - Upstream distfile is no longer available from the original
On Mon, Mar 11, 2024, at 16:41, Yuri wrote:
> Is it known who is the contact person for portsfallout.com ?
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Yuri
I’ll take a look. It appears to be an issue with Scrapy and a new version of
the Twisted dependency.
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/local/bin/scr
On Mon, Mar 11, 2024, at 17:55, Danilo G. Baio wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2024, at 16:41, Yuri wrote:
>> Is it known who is the contact person for portsfallout.com ?
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Yuri
>
>
> I’ll take a look. It appears to be an issue with Scrapy and a new
> version of the Twisted depend
Dear port maintainers,
The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more
unmaintained ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity
to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. Please consider also adopting this po
18 matches
Mail list logo
