Poudriere broken!!!

2024-02-29 Thread Einar Bjarni Halldórsson
Hi, I’m using poudriere-devel and it’s completely broken now The web UI looks modern and actually works. Safari always had a problem not updating with info about ongoing builds, that’s fixed now. How am I supposed to work with something like this, when I’ve gotten used to the old UI?!? I’m

Re: Proposed ports deprecation and removal policy

2024-02-29 Thread Dag-Erling Smørgrav
Florian Smeets writes: > Ports can be removed immediately if one of the following conditions is met: > > - Upstream distfile is no longer available from the original > source/mirror (Our and other distcaches e.g. Debian, Gentoo, etc do > not count as "available") Strong disagree, give the mai

Re: Proposed ports deprecation and removal policy

2024-02-29 Thread Cy Schubert
In message <864jdrzcov@ltc.des.dev>, =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav? = w rites: > Florian Smeets writes: > > Ports can be removed immediately if one of the following conditions is me= > t: > > > > - Upstream distfile is no longer available from the original > > source/mirror (Our and oth

Re: Proposed ports deprecation and removal policy

2024-02-29 Thread Xin LI
On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 11:22 AM Florian Smeets wrote: > Dear ports community, > > as the removal of ports is a recurring source of friction and dispute we > would like to add a ports removal and deprecation policy to the porters > handbook. > > We tried to find a sensible middle ground between t

Merge access review + QT6 update best practices

2024-02-29 Thread henrichhartzer
Hi everyone, I have two requests for help. First one is that I updated one of my ports, but I don't have merge access. Would appreciate it if someone can review. Ideally would merge to main + backport to quarterly. If there's something missing in the report that should be there, please let me

Re: Proposed ports deprecation and removal policy

2024-02-29 Thread Miroslav Lachman
On 29/02/2024 20:26, Xin LI wrote: [...] Could you please explain why upstream WWW would warrant a removal?  (I think removing the WWW= entry if the website is compromised or is no longer available is perfectly fine, but why remove the port itself?) - BROKEN for more than 6 months I th

Re: emulators/mame: Increasing option granularity woes

2024-02-29 Thread Alastair Hogge
On 2024-02-27 14:24, Gleb Popov wrote: > On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 5:43 AM Alastair Hogge wrote: >> >> however, I do not know how that translates to Makefile >> targets, like do-install-NON_USER_FACING_OPT-on. Currently the Makefile >> target is of the ".if somecond FOO= .else BAR= .endif" form. >

Re: Proposed ports deprecation and removal policy

2024-02-29 Thread Tomoaki AOKI
On Thu, 29 Feb 2024 09:43:38 -0800 Cy Schubert wrote: > In message <864jdrzcov@ltc.des.dev>, =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav? > = w > rites: > > Florian Smeets writes: > > > Ports can be removed immediately if one of the following conditions is me= > > t: > > > > > > - Upstream distfile i

Unmaintained FreeBSD ports which are out of date

2024-02-29 Thread portscout
Dear port maintainers, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more unmaintained ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. Please consider also adopting this po