Re: Best practice to bump consumers portrevision on quarterly

2023-11-26 Thread Mathieu Arnold
On Thu, Nov 23, 2023 at 11:30:21AM +, Nuno Teixeira wrote: > Hello, > > What is the correct way of bumping consumers in quarterly? > > 1. cherry-pick port update > 2. bump portrevision consumers on quarterly directly? Updates pushed to quarterly are supposed to be security or bug fixes, not

Re: Best practice to bump consumers portrevision on quarterly

2023-11-26 Thread Nuno Teixeira
Hello Mathieu, My doubt is related to wxWidgets update that involves security, bug fixes and some changes: https://cgit.freebsd.org/ports/commit/?id=e469df520bef0163bba99153f24b1de06d9364f8 There's the bump comsumers on main: https://cgit.freebsd.org/ports/commit/?id=03eac77c103b637b316d6a73df7ca

Re: Best practice to bump consumers portrevision on quarterly

2023-11-26 Thread Jan Beich
Nuno Teixeira writes: > Hello, > > What is the correct way of bumping consumers in quarterly? > > 1. cherry-pick port update > 2. bump portrevision consumers on quarterly directly? Cherry-pick both. To overcome merge conflicts reset index and bump directly. The important part is to retain the co

Unmaintained FreeBSD ports which are out of date

2023-11-26 Thread portscout
Dear port maintainers, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more unmaintained ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. Please consider also adopting this po

Best practice for port that are meant to be statically linked, or how should we handle boringssl

2023-11-26 Thread Xin Li
Hi, I recently noticed that security/boringssl is treated in a similar way of OpenSSL and LibreSSL. Although boringssl is derived from OpenSSL, it's usually meant to be statically linked into the resulting binary, because there is no guarantee of ABI stability across different releases and t