Hi there, I have been working with Snowflake, dbt, and duckdb for the past
several months. I have created 12 new ports in support of this. I've read
Porter's Handbook a bunch, as well as Python Ports wiki page, and have taken
this porting work as far as I can for the time being. I would like to
Hi!
> Is it reasonable to submit several ports as part of one PR?
> For my purposes, there are a handful of "leaf" ports:
[...]
> So on one extreme, I have to submit each port, one-at-a-time,
> in order. On the other extreme, I submit all 12 in one PR.
>
> How should I go about submitting these n
Hi,
I am running FreeBSD 13.2 amd64 with quarterly 2023Q4 packages for my
desktop. I cannot run Wine applications after the last pkg upgrade.
There is a version mismatch and there is no i386 for Wine 8.
% wine
wine [wine-7.0.2] and wine64 [wine-8.0.2] versions do not match!
Try updating 32-bit
Hello,
I am not an expert of the wine ports, but I have asked
someone who knows well these ports but is not subscribed to
this mailing list. His suggestion is to not use wine8, but use
wine7 instead and wait for wine9.
The main problem with the wine ports is that nobody
is actually really maintai
On 18/10/2023 15:13, Lorenzo Salvadore wrote:
Hello,
I am not an expert of the wine ports, but I have asked
someone who knows well these ports but is not subscribed to
this mailing list. His suggestion is to not use wine8, but use
wine7 instead and wait for wine9.
Yes, downgrade to wine 7 is t
On 2023-10-18 03:22, Tatsuki Makino wrote:
Tatsuki Makino wrote on 2023/10/18 09:06:
pkg set -n openssl:openssl111
pkg set -o security/openssl:security/openssl111
Will these changes also update the local.sqlite deps table? :)
I have run it in my environment. in use :)
From the results of `pkg
Dear port maintainers,
The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more
unmaintained ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity
to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. Please consider also adopting this po
Bernard Spil wrote on 2023/10/19 02:09:
> On 2023-10-18 03:22, Tatsuki Makino wrote:
>> By the way, security/openssl111 of origin has been disused once, around
>> 2020-01-01.
>> And if it is used again, how will PORTEPOCH be treated?
>
> At no point was anything committed to security/openssl111 t
On Wed, Oct 18, 2023, at 2:08 AM, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
> Hi!
>
>> Is it reasonable to submit several ports as part of one PR?
>> For my purposes, there are a handful of "leaf" ports:
> [...]
>
> If you add one port per PR and set the proper dependencies in each PR,
> it's easy for several committers
