Re: HEADS-UP: security/openssl switching to 3.0 branch

On 17/10/2023 08:41, Xavier Humbert wrote: Hi Bernard, To be clear, if one wants to keep old openssl11, add DEFAULT_VERSIONS+= ssl=openssl111 to make .conf Am I right ? That is correct. OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: HEADS-UP: security/openssl switching to 3.0 branch

On 16/10/2023 17:04, DutchDaemon - FreeBSD Forums Administrator wrote: This actually helped. So for old, deep-down remnants of OpenSSL 1.1. to disappear, a wholesale pkg delete -a -f -y and a reinstall of all node packages (get them through pkg prime-origins) is advisable. Note: switching

Re: HEADS-UP: security/openssl switching to 3.0 branch

On 16/10/2023 12:49, DutchDaemon - FreeBSD Forums Administrator wrote: Certbot is now also broken: # certbot Traceback (most recent call last):   File "/usr/local/bin/certbot", line 33, in     sys.exit(load_entry_point('certbot==2.6.0', 'console_scripts', 'certbot')())   File "/usr/local/bi

Re: HEADS-UP: security/openssl switching to 3.0 branch

On 17/10/2023 12:43, DutchDaemon - FreeBSD Forums Administrator wrote: I have retried all kinds of rebuilds, new build jails, CCACHE on/off, and full deinstalls/reinstalls, but this remains a problem; I see that there are OpenSSL/py-crypto bugs filed for this, so I will stop trying to remedy

Re: HEADS-UP: security/openssl switching to 3.0 branch

On 17/10/2023 12:51, DutchDaemon - FreeBSD Forums Administrator wrote: And, as noted elsewhere, it's linked to the base system OpenSSL, not the ported OpenSSL (make.conf has ssl=openssl). # ldd /usr/local/lib/python3.9/site-packages/cryptography/hazmat/bindings/_rust.abi3.so /usr/local/lib/py

Re: Does anyone has patch for math/py-scikit-umfpack ?

Hi, Thierry ! On Tue, 17 Oct 2023 02:43:05 +0900, Thierry Thomas wrote: > > [1 ] > Le lun. 16 oct. 23 .AN` 12:26:07 +0200, KIRIYAMA Kazuhiko > .ANicrivaitN : > > Hi, list > > Hello, > > > I'm building audio/audacity package, but failed at > > math/py-scikit-umfpack: > > I just submitte

Any chance of MySQL 5.7.43?

dev.mysql.com MySQL :: MySQL 5.7 Release Notes :: Changes in MySQL 5.7.43 (2023-07-18, General Availability) <#> 🔗 https://dev.mysql.com/doc/relnotes/mysql/5.7/en/news-5-7-43.html Currently, the 5.7.42 in Ports fails to buil

Re: Any chance of MySQL 5.7.43?

Hi, You could mail the maintainer of the port and ask for an upgrade. See https://www.freshports.org/databases/mysql57-server Or file a PR on https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?component=Individual%20Port%28s%29&list_id=647720&product=Ports%20%26%20Packages&query_format=advanced&reso

Re: Any chance of MySQL 5.7.43?

On 17/10/2023 15:35, Ronald Klop wrote: Hi, You could mail the maintainer of the port and ask for an upgrade. See https://www.freshports.org/databases/mysql57-server Or file a PR on https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?component=Individual%20Port%28s%29&list_id=647720&product=Ports%

Re: Any chance of MySQL 5.7.43?

> On Oct 17, 2023, at 3:40 PM, DutchDaemon - FreeBSD Forums Administrator > wrote: > > > On 17/10/2023 15:35, Ronald Klop wrote: >> Hi, >> >> You could mail the maintainer of the port and ask for an upgrade. >> See https://www.freshports.org/databases/mysql57-server >> >> Or file a PR on >

Re: Any chance of MySQL 5.7.43?

Hello, yes, the port is updated to 5.7.43. I am also working on MySQL 8.1 at the same time. Please remember, if you are still using MySQL 5.7, that it will be deleted at the end of this year and you must use MySQL 8.0 then :-) Best regards Jochen Am 17.10.23 um 15:40 schrieb DutchDaemon

Re: Any chance of MySQL 5.7.43?

On 17/10/2023 16:08, Jochen Neumeister wrote: Hello, yes, the port is updated to 5.7.43. I am also working on MySQL 8.1 at the same time. Please remember, if you are still using MySQL 5.7, that it will be deleted at the end of this year and you must use MySQL 8.0 then :-) Many thanks, a

Re: HEADS-UP: security/openssl switching to 3.0 branch

On Mon 2023-10-16 (17:04), DutchDaemon - FreeBSD Forums Administrator wrote: > On 16/10/2023 13:14, DutchDaemon - FreeBSD Forums Administrator wrote: > > On 16/10/2023 13:07, Guido Falsi wrote: > > > On 16/10/23 13:03, DutchDaemon - FreeBSD Forums Administrator wrote: > > > > On 16/10/2023 12:57, G

Re: HEADS-UP: security/openssl switching to 3.0 branch

Hello. Xavier Humbert wrote on 2023/10/17 15:41: > DEFAULT_VERSIONS+= ssl=openssl111 We who want to keep 1.1.1 should just do that thing we always do, right? The pkg version results would show the following. openssl-1.1.1w,1 < needs updating (index has 3.0.11,1) security/ope

Re: HEADS-UP: security/openssl switching to 3.0 branch

Tatsuki Makino wrote on 2023/10/18 09:06: > pkg set -n openssl:openssl111 > pkg set -o security/openssl:security/openssl111 > Will these changes also update the local.sqlite deps table? :) I have run it in my environment. in use :) >From the results of `pkg shell .dump | grep openssl`, it seems th

Unmaintained FreeBSD ports which are out of date

Dear port maintainers, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more unmaintained ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. Please consider also adopting this po