Re: security/clamav: /var/run on TMPFS renders the port broken by design

Hi, > On 29. Aug 2022, at 8:24 AM, FreeBSD User wrote: > > Checking today NanoBSD based projects, i.e. XigmaNAS, which also let /var > reside on a memory > disk and the way NanoBSD handles /var, contradicts some claims that is is > 'unsupported' to put > /var on a volatile memory infrastructur

Re: security/clamav: /var/run on TMPFS renders the port broken by design

On Mon, 29 Aug 2022 10:31:28 +0200 Franco Fichtner wrote: > Hi, > > > On 29. Aug 2022, at 8:24 AM, FreeBSD User wrote: > > > > Checking today NanoBSD based projects, i.e. XigmaNAS, which also let /var > > reside on a memory > > disk and the way NanoBSD handles /var, contradicts some claims th

Re: security/clamav: /var/run on TMPFS renders the port broken by design

In message <20220829082514.63926...@thor.intern.walstatt.dynvpn.de>, FreeBSD Us er writes: > Am Sun, 28 Aug 2022 06:11:20 -0700 > Cy Schubert schrieb: > > > In message <20220828130107.1a76d54a.gre...@freebsd.org>, Michael Gmelin > > writes: > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, 28 Aug 2022 03:21:24 -