Forgot to send the reply to the list.
Van: Ronald Klop
Datum: vrijdag, 26 augustus 2022 10:12
Aan: "Michael A. Oshin"
Onderwerp: Re: Fwd: New Port: Security/liblurch & Security/Pidgin-lurch
Mmm, lets take another look at it.
From /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.ports.mk:
"# Set these variables if your po
Hi,
See https://pkg-status.freebsd.org/builds?type=package&all=1. Pkg builds for
armv6 are broken for quite a while on the main branch.
The build if ports-mgmt/pkg already fails. The error log indicates that it can't find the
compiler "/nxb-bin/usr/bin/cc". Why does it use such a weird locatio
** The following ports have a version number that sorts before a previous one **
For many package tools to work correctly, it is of utmost importance that
version numbers of a port form a monotonic increasing sequence over time.
Refer to the FreeBSD Porter's Handbook, 'Package Naming Convention
Saw this on a couple of laptops, each of which is configured to use a
swap-backed tmpfs for /tmp -- started at 2G, which didn't work so well.
Looks as if they are over the worst of it, and I've seen /tmp/get to
4.8G used -- in cdase this helps someone else avoid some of the hassle.
(This was amd6
David Wolfskill writes:
> Saw this on a couple of laptops, each of which is configured to use a
> swap-backed tmpfs for /tmp -- started at 2G, which didn't work so well.
>
> Looks as if they are over the worst of it, and I've seen /tmp/get to
> 4.8G used -- in cdase this helps someone else avoid
On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 04:06:39PM +0200, Jan Beich wrote:
> ...
> Disable LTO_BOOTSTRAP port option or see
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=265254
Good to know; thanks.
In any case, one of the laptops finished OK (after having increased
tmpfs to 8G). (I had needed to suspend
* Ronald Klop [20220826 10:33]:
> The build if ports-mgmt/pkg already fails. The error log indicates
> that it can't find the compiler "/nxb-bin/usr/bin/cc". Why does it use
> such a weird location for the compiler? Other architectures don't need
> to do this.
Th
* Ronald Klop [20220826 19:07]:
> On 8/26/22 17:26, Michael A. Oshin wrote:
> > 2) Next, try use the GH repo (Preferred) and you will see the below error:
That's not preferred. Only use it for projects that *don't* provide
explicit distfiles.
> > On a final note, what
Dear port maintainers,
The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more
unmaintained ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity
to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. Please consider also adopting this po
Thanks Ronald and other folks,
It now builds and deploys into the right dir. I needed to get rid of the
LD_CONFIG too.
See the makefile at
https://github.com/micadeyeye/freebsd-ports/blob/master/security/liblurch/Makefile
.
1) However, how do I get rid of the below error?
-
===> Generati
Hello,
I'm referencing to Bug 259699 [2] and Bug 259585 [1].
Port security/clamav is without doubt for many of FreeBSD users an important
piece of security
software so I assume a widespread usage.
It is also a not uncommon use case to use NanoBSD or any kind of
low-memory-footprint
installatio
11 matches
Mail list logo
