On 6/12/22 01:56, Michael Gmelin wrote:
The key is correcting the typo in PORTNAME:
gingko => ginkgo
Thanks for spotting that typo. That was indeed the problem.
Cheers
Philipp
Hello,
I'm trying to find a variable to silince portlint warning like, e.g.:
WARN: Makefile: possible use of absolute pathname "/usr/bin/clang
...
but I can't find one like LOCALBASE==/usr/local
Is there one like it
Thanks,
Nuno Teixeira
Nuno Teixeira escreveu no dia domingo, 12/06/2022
à(s) 15:42:
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to find a variable to silince portlint warning like, e.g.:
> WARN: Makefile: possible use of absolute pathname "
Hello,
I will start using ccache with poudriere for may test builds and I'm asking
if there is any zfs tweaks/optimization that improve read/write ccache
speed?
Thanks,
Nuno Teixeira
Am 11.06.22 um 16:20 schrieb Larry Rosenman:
> greetings,
> I'm having trouble getting anyone to care about lsof anymore. If anyone
> can help fix these merge conflicts, I'd be most
> appreciative, and will merge and make a new FreeBSD release as soon as we get
> it fixed:
> https://github.com
On 06/12/2022 3:29 pm, Stefan Esser wrote:
Am 11.06.22 um 16:20 schrieb Larry Rosenman:
greetings,
I'm having trouble getting anyone to care about lsof anymore. If
anyone
can help fix these merge conflicts, I'd be most
appreciative, and will merge and make a new FreeBSD release as soon as
Am 12.06.22 um 22:48 schrieb Larry Rosenman:
> On 06/12/2022 3:29 pm, Stefan Esser wrote:
[...]
>> On a kernel built with D34184 and D34323 applied I get output
>> like this:
>>
>> COMMAND PID USER FD TYPE DEVICE SIZE/OFF NODE NAME
>> bash 3313 se txt VREG 3086741924,1
Hello,
I've started to use ccache with poudriere again passed some years now and
I've noticed that we still use ccache legacy 3.x version.
Any special reason or imcompatibility for no updating to 4.x version?
Thanks,
Nuno Teixeira
On Sun, Jun 12, 2022 at 07:46:41PM EDT, Nuno Teixeira wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've started to use ccache with poudriere again passed some years now and
> I've noticed that we still use ccache legacy 3.x version.
>
> Any special reason or imcompatibility for no updating to 4.x version?
>
> Thanks,
>
"Bojan Petrovic" writes:
> c) to this, I can only offer to take maintainership of ports-mgmt/synth
> and lang/gcc6-aux. I haven't maintained a FreeBSD port before, so I
> must admit I cannot estimate how much effort it would require on my
> side. I only have a hunch that these ports will be slow-
10 matches
Mail list logo