On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 07:46:35PM +0100, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
> On 22/11/2021 10:46, Rene Ladan wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 01:57:56AM +, Pau Amma wrote:
> >> On 2021-11-18 01:37, Kubilay Kocak wrote:
> >>> We've had many user reports over the last year re the entire
> >>> situation,
Hello,
> > Removing Iridium was a really bad step.
> To all of those that keep complaining that Iridium got removed:
> feel free to bring it back and maintain it.
They were removed by you because they depended on python 2.7,
so has the policy changed ? Can it be brought back ?
2020-12-31 www/ir
On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 10:07:59AM +0100, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
> Hello,
>
> > > Removing Iridium was a really bad step.
>
> > To all of those that keep complaining that Iridium got removed:
> > feel free to bring it back and maintain it.
>
> They were removed by you because they depended on python
Hi!
> > > > Removing Iridium was a really bad step.
> > > To all of those that keep complaining that Iridium got removed:
> > > feel free to bring it back and maintain it.
> > They were removed by you because they depended on python 2.7,
> > so has the policy changed ? Can it be brought back ?
On 23/11/2021 10:54, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
Hi!
Removing Iridium was a really bad step.
To all of those that keep complaining that Iridium got removed:
feel free to bring it back and maintain it.
They were removed by you because they depended on python 2.7,
so has the policy changed ? Can it
As a general observation, there is a concept of "too big to fail".
As we can see, it applies not only to companies but to ports as well.
Or in other words, quod licet Iovi, non licet bovi.
And that's reasonable.
--
Andriy Gapon
