Re: Bringing back lang/python27 with few modules?

2021-11-22 Thread Rene Ladan
On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 01:57:56AM +, Pau Amma wrote: > On 2021-11-18 01:37, Kubilay Kocak wrote: > > We've had many user reports over the last year re the entire > > situation, including a number recently about pypy in particular. > > Late to the discussion, but I'm sad that Chromium survived

FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date

2021-11-22 Thread portscout
Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you

Re: Bringing back lang/python27 with few modules?

2021-11-22 Thread Miroslav Lachman
On 22/11/2021 10:46, Rene Ladan wrote: On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 01:57:56AM +, Pau Amma wrote: On 2021-11-18 01:37, Kubilay Kocak wrote: We've had many user reports over the last year re the entire situation, including a number recently about pypy in particular. Late to the discussion, but

Re: Bringing back lang/python27 with few modules?

2021-11-22 Thread Pedro Giffuni
Sorry for top posting here: How about Tauthon ... a sort-of-maintained fork is better than maintaining 2.7 on our own. https://github.com/naftaliharris/tauthon Pedro. On 22/11/2021 13:46, Miroslav Lachman wrote: On 22/11/2021 10:46, Rene Ladan wrote: On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 01:57:56AM +000

Re: Bringing back lang/python27 with few modules?

2021-11-22 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi! > How about Tauthon ... a sort-of-maintained fork is better than maintaining > 2.7 on our own. > > https://github.com/naftaliharris/tauthon See the palemoon PR, where this is part of the debate: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251117 -- p...@freebsd.org +49 171 3