Hi,
On 15/11/2021 10:21, Guido Falsi wrote:
You look too worried by the "functionality added" part.
Yes, I am worried. Of course I am.
When I first asked my question the day before yesterday, the first
responses were in the line of "port maintainers can do whatever they
want", accompanied by
On 16/11/21 11:34, Rob LA LAU wrote:
Hi,
On 15/11/2021 10:21, Guido Falsi wrote:
You look too worried by the "functionality added" part.
Yes, I am worried. Of course I am.
Now I feel compelled to reply to all this rant of yours because you are
replying to me, but I really have little more
Hi!
> On 15/11/2021 10:21, Guido Falsi wrote:
> > You look too worried by the "functionality added" part.
>
> Yes, I am worried. Of course I am.
> When I first asked my question the day before yesterday, the first
> responses were in the line of "port maintainers can do whatever they
> want", acc
On 16/11/21 11:56, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
Hi!
On 15/11/2021 10:21, Guido Falsi wrote:
You look too worried by the "functionality added" part.
Yes, I am worried. Of course I am.
When I first asked my question the day before yesterday, the first
responses were in the line of "port maintainers can
On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 11:34:45AM +0100, Rob LA LAU wrote:
> Yes, I am worried. Of course I am.
> When I first asked my question the day before yesterday, the first
> responses were in the line of "port maintainers can do whatever they
> want", accompanied by emoticons with sunglasses.
> So th
On Sun, 14 Nov 2021 17:57:23 -0800 Mark Millard
wrote:
> poudriere output:
>
> [00:24:23] [09] [00:01:20] Saved devel/automake | automake-1.16.4 wrkdir to:
> /usr/local/poudriere/data/wrkdirs/13_0R-CA72-default/default/automake-1.16.4.tbz
> [00:24:23] [09] [00:01:20] Finished devel/automake | au
On 11/16/21 2:34 AM, Rob LA LAU wrote:
> ...Even OpenBSD, if you want to keep it close to home, dictates
> that all patches, work-arounds and dependencies must be documented, and
> that all changes must be sent upstream to try and have them included in
> the original work...
Openbsd packages come
On 16/11/2021 17:59, Jose Quinteiro wrote:
Openbsd packages come with the following caveat:
> [...]
Every operating system comes with this caveat; OpenBSD just says it out
loud. No BSD, nor any Linux distro, has the resources to go through the
source code of all ported software, to make su
On 2021-Nov-16, at 08:42, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Nov 2021 17:57:23 -0800 Mark Millard
> wrote:
>> poudriere output:
>>
>> [00:24:23] [09] [00:01:20] Saved devel/automake | automake-1.16.4 wrkdir to:
>> /usr/local/poudriere/data/wrkdirs/13_0R-CA72-default/default/automake-1.16.4.t
On Tue, 16 Nov 2021, Gregory Byshenk wrote:
I am just a user, but my understanding is that FreeBSD developers take
the OS very seriously, but do not take themselves too seriously.
Best comment I've seen in this increasingly-sillier thread.
-- Dave
On 2021-11-16 07:14, Mikhail T. wrote:
On 13.11.21 15:51, Daniel Engberg wrote:
I agree that old doesn't necessarily mean it's useless
Noted!
however we do need to prune the ports from time to time
Why? Why do we need to "prune the ports from time to time"? I'm aware
of one principle,
Hi,
I am still a bit concerned with the total removal of python 2.7 year ago
and its support, I think this was a somewhat swift decision that may need
to be re-considered. I understand the urge for portmgr to move base over to
a supported version, but also that caused few important packages to be
12 matches
Mail list logo
