Re: Adding functionality to a port

2021-11-15 Thread Rob LA LAU
Hi, On 14/11/2021 20:49, Guido Falsi wrote: You talk about "adding a periodic script". That is not even a real modification to the upstream software IMHO. Just adding some glue code for FreeBSD. If the script does what it advertises, and has no malicious intent I see nothing wrong with it. If

Re: Adding functionality to a port

2021-11-15 Thread Guido Falsi
On 15/11/21 09:42, Rob LA LAU wrote: Hi, On 14/11/2021 20:49, Guido Falsi wrote: You talk about "adding a periodic script". That is not even a real modification to the upstream software IMHO. Just adding some glue code for FreeBSD. If the script does what it advertises, and has no malicious i

Re: Adding functionality to a port

2021-11-15 Thread Ronald Klop via freebsd-ports
Van: Rob LA LAU Datum: zondag, 14 november 2021 16:56 Aan: ronald-li...@klop.ws, freebsd-po...@freebsd.org Onderwerp: Re: Adding functionality to a port Thanks Ronald. But I'm not asking how or where to report bugs. Allow me to rephrase my question. If and when I am a FreeBSD port maintainer

Re: Adding functionality to a port

2021-11-15 Thread Guido Falsi
On 15/11/21 12:01, Ronald Klop via freebsd-ports wrote: Van: Rob LA LAU Datum: zondag, 14 november 2021 16:56 Aan: ronald-li...@klop.ws, freebsd-po...@freebsd.org Onderwerp: Re: Adding functionality to a port Thanks Ronald. But I'm not asking how or where to report bugs. Allow me to rephrase

FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date

2021-11-15 Thread portscout
Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you

armv7 targeting (on aarch64, via poudriere-devel): system's clang 13 rejected building devel/lllvm13

2021-11-15 Thread Mark Millard via arm
There error was: error: non-constant-expression cannot be narrowed from type 'long long' to 'std::size_t' (aka 'unsi gned int') in initializer list [-Wc++11-narrowing] std::size_t resultBytes{size * elementBytes}; ^~~ /wrkdirs/usr/ports/devel/llvm13/wor

Re: armv7 targeting (on aarch64, via poudriere-devel): system's clang 13 rejected building devel/lllvm13

2021-11-15 Thread Dimitry Andric
On 15 Nov 2021, at 19:14, Mark Millard via arm wrote: > > There error was: > > error: non-constant-expression cannot be narrowed from type 'long long' to > 'std::size_t' (aka 'unsi > gned int') in initializer list [-Wc++11-narrowing] > std::size_t resultBytes{size * elementBytes}; >

Re: armv7 targeting (on aarch64, via poudriere-devel): system's clang 13 rejected building devel/lllvm13

2021-11-15 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-toolchain
On 2021-Nov-15, at 10:40, Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 15 Nov 2021, at 19:14, Mark Millard via arm wrote: >> >> There error was: >> >> error: non-constant-expression cannot be narrowed from type 'long long' to >> 'std::size_t' (aka 'unsi >> gned int') in initializer list [-Wc++11-narrowing] >>

Re: armv7 targeting (on aarch64, via poudriere-devel): system's clang 13 rejected building devel/lllvm13

2021-11-15 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-toolchain
On 2021-Nov-15, at 11:35, Mark Millard wrote: > On 2021-Nov-15, at 10:40, Dimitry Andric wrote: > >> On 15 Nov 2021, at 19:14, Mark Millard via arm wrote: >>> >>> There error was: >>> >>> error: non-constant-expression cannot be narrowed from type 'long long' to >>> 'std::size_t' (aka 'u

missing poudriere-devel output: an example

2021-11-15 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-ports
In the following output from poudriere-devel there is no report of devel/llvm13 in [02] being "Finished" or [02] starting devel/qt5-help but there is a report of [02] finishing devel/qt5-help . The "Built ports" list does include devel/llvm13 . . . . load: 32.63 cmd: sh 40873 [runnable] 0.01r 0

Re: Regarding port(s) you maintain in FreeBSD ports collection

2021-11-15 Thread Mikhail T.
On 13.11.21 15:51, Daniel Engberg wrote: I agree that old doesn't necessarily mean it's useless Noted! however we do need to prune the ports from time to time Why? Why do we need to "prune the ports from time to time"? I'm aware of one principle, under which a port can be deleted: the port