Re: Can we remove FREEBSD_TEMPLATE from devel/subversion now?

2021-09-20 Thread D'Arcy Cain
On 9/19/21 8:04 PM, Kubilay Kocak wrote: > A bugzilla issue being created with a proposed patch would be great, thanks! Bug 258627 Submitted -- D'Arcy J.M. Cain | Democracy is three wolves http://www.druid.net/darcy/| and a sheep voting on +1 416 788 2246 (DoD#0082

FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date

2021-09-20 Thread portscout
Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you

Re: security/metasploit: package ... is not in GOROOT

2021-09-20 Thread Marco Beishuizen
On Sun, 19 Sep 2021, the wise Marco Beishuizen wrote: Hi, I'm trying to create an portupdate for metasploit. The created patch is working fine and the new metasploit works, but when starting metasploit I get some warnings: [...] [!] The following modules could not be loaded!..| [!] /usr/lo

Re: armv7 target (on aarch64 HW) and poudriere-based emulators/mame link failure vs. success based on the number of cores

2021-09-20 Thread Lucas Nali de Magalhães
> On Sep 19, 2021, at 6:14 AM, Mark Millard via freebsd-toolchain > wrote:(…) > > (…) > > The HoneyComb failure looks to me like like hitting the process > size limitations for armv7, something that did not happen on the > MACCHIATObin Double Shot or RPi4B (fewer cores). > > It looks to me lik

Re: armv7 target (on aarch64 HW) and poudriere-based emulators/mame link failure vs. success based on the number of cores

2021-09-20 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-ports
On 2021-Sep-20, at 12:54, Lucas Nali de Magalhães wrote: > On Sep 19, 2021, at 6:14 AM, Mark Millard via freebsd-toolchain > wrote:(…) > > (…) > > The HoneyComb failure looks to me like like hitting the process > size limitations for armv7, something that did not happen on the > MACCHIATObi

Re: armv7 target (on aarch64 HW) and poudriere-based emulators/mame link failure vs. success based on the number of cores

2021-09-20 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-ports
On 2021-Sep-20, at 13:58, Mark Millard wrote: > > On 2021-Sep-20, at 12:54, Lucas Nali de Magalhães > wrote: > >> On Sep 19, 2021, at 6:14 AM, Mark Millard via freebsd-toolchain >> wrote:(…) >> >> (…) >> >> The HoneyComb failure looks to me like like hitting the process >> size limitation

Re: armv7 target (on aarch64 HW) and poudriere-based emulators/mame link failure vs. success based on the number of cores

2021-09-20 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-ports
On 2021-Sep-20, at 15:10, Mark Millard wrote: > On 2021-Sep-20, at 13:58, Mark Millard wrote: > >> >> On 2021-Sep-20, at 12:54, Lucas Nali de Magalhães >> wrote: >> >>> On Sep 19, 2021, at 6:14 AM, Mark Millard via freebsd-toolchain >>> wrote:(…) >>> >>> (…) >>> >>> The HoneyComb failur