Hi!
> pkg audit complains that
> > py37-aiohttp-3.7.4.p0 (www/py-aiohttp) is vulnerable:
> > aiohttp -- open redirect vulnerability
> > CVE: CVE-2021-21330
> > WWW:
> > https://vuxml.FreeBSD.org/freebsd/3000acee-c45d-11eb-904f-14dae9d5a9d2.html
> >
> > 1 problem(s) found.
>
> However, AFA
Dear port maintainer,
The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your
ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check
each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you
Van: Pedro Giffuni
Datum: dinsdag, 22 juni 2021 22:21
Aan: Ronald Klop , FreeBSD Ports
Onderwerp: Re: databases/cockroach: any PPC64|arm64 tester?
On 22/06/2021 12:12, Ronald Klop wrote:
Van: Ronald Klop
Datum: 22 juni 2021 09:56
Aan: Pedro Giffuni
CC: FreeBSD Ports
Onderwerp: Re: data
On 2021-Jun-22, at 22:09, bob prohaska wrote:
> Attempts to compile devel/llvm10 on a RPi3 under poudriere using
> poudriere bulk -J 2 -j main devel/llvm10 > bulk.log &
> are failing with:
>
> In file included from
> /wrkdirs/usr/ports/devel/llvm10/work/llvm-10.0.1.src/lib/Target/AMDGPU/AMDGPUI
On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 3:29 PM Kurt Jaeger wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> > pkg audit complains that
> > > py37-aiohttp-3.7.4.p0 (www/py-aiohttp) is vulnerable:
> > > aiohttp -- open redirect vulnerability
> > > CVE: CVE-2021-21330
> > > WWW:
> > > https://vuxml.FreeBSD.org/freebsd/3000acee-c45d-11eb-
** The following ports have a version number that sorts before a previous one **
For many package tools to work correctly, it is of utmost importance that
version numbers of a port form a monotonic increasing sequence over time.
Refer to the FreeBSD Porter's Handbook, 'Package Naming Convention
23.06.2021 19:48, er...@freebsd.org wrote:
> ** The following ports have a version number that sorts before a previous one
> **
>
> For many package tools to work correctly, it is of utmost importance that
> version numbers of a port form a monotonic increasing sequence over time.
> Refer to
23.06.2021 19:55, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> 23.06.2021 19:48, er...@freebsd.org wrote:
>
>> ** The following ports have a version number that sorts before a previous
>> one **
>>
>> For many package tools to work correctly, it is of utmost importance that
>> version numbers of a port form a mon
On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 01:34:55AM -0700, Mark Millard wrote:
>
> Not that it helps much, but: 2779096485 == 0xA5A5A5A5
>
> It appears that such somehow was involved-in/generated by:
>
> [ 24% 1326/5364] cd /wrkdirs/usr/ports/devel/llvm10/work/.build &&
> /wrkdirs/usr/ports/devel/llvm10/work/.b
On 2021-Jun-23, at 10:43, bob prohaska wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 01:34:55AM -0700, Mark Millard wrote:
>>
>> Not that it helps much, but: 2779096485 == 0xA5A5A5A5
>>
>> It appears that such somehow was involved-in/generated by:
>>
>> [ 24% 1326/5364] cd /wrkdirs/usr/ports/devel/llvm10/w
On 23/06/2021 03:20, Ronald Klop wrote:
*Van:* Pedro Giffuni
*Datum:* dinsdag, 22 juni 2021 22:21
*Aan:* Ronald Klop , FreeBSD Ports
*Onderwerp:* Re: databases/cockroach: any PPC64|arm64 tester?
On 22/06/2021 12:12, Ronald Klop wrote:
*Van:* Ronald Klop
*Datum:* 22 jun
On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 02:03:42PM -0700, Mark Millard wrote:
> On 2021-Jun-23, at 10:43, bob prohaska wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 01:34:55AM -0700, Mark Millard wrote:
> >>
> >> Not that it helps much, but: 2779096485 == 0xA5A5A5A5
> >>
> >> It appears that such somehow was involved-i
On 2021-Jun-23, at 15:28, bob prohaska wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 02:03:42PM -0700, Mark Millard wrote:
>> On 2021-Jun-23, at 10:43, bob prohaska wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 01:34:55AM -0700, Mark Millard wrote:
Not that it helps much, but: 2779096485 == 0xA5A5A5A5
>>
Misc notes . . .
Looking at your logs, I expect trying to build both
llvm10 and rust in parallel is likely to run into
resource issues on teh RPi3B+. For builds in that
context, it may be better to do something like:
# poudriere buld -j main devel/llvm10
# poudriere buld -j main lang/rust
# poudr
On 2021-Jun-23, at 17:58, Mark Millard wrote:
> Misc notes . . .
>
> Looking at your logs, I expect trying to build both
> llvm10 and rust in parallel is likely to run into
> resource issues on teh RPi3B+. For builds in that
> context, it may be better to do something like:
>
> # poudriere buld
On 2021-Jun-23, at 18:15, Mark Millard wrote:
> On 2021-Jun-23, at 17:58, Mark Millard wrote:
>
>> Misc notes . . .
>>
>> Looking at your logs, I expect trying to build both
>> llvm10 and rust in parallel is likely to run into
>> resource issues on teh RPi3B+. For builds in that
>> context, it
On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 04:22:35PM -0700, Mark Millard wrote:
> On 2021-Jun-23, at 15:28, bob prohaska wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 02:03:42PM -0700, Mark Millard wrote:
> >> On 2021-Jun-23, at 10:43, bob prohaska wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 01:34:55AM -0700, Mark Millard
On 2021-Jun-23, at 21:30, bob prohaska wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 04:22:35PM -0700, Mark Millard wrote:
>> On 2021-Jun-23, at 15:28, bob prohaska wrote:
>> . . .
>
>>
> [snipped for brevity]
>>
For example, 0xA5u byte values might be the value that newly
allocated memory is in
18 matches
Mail list logo
