Matthias Apitz writes:
> El día miércoles, septiembre 13, 2023 a las 11:40:57 +0200, Jan Beich
> escribió:
>
>> There are but not officially[1] supported by ports/ e.g.,
>>
>> $ rm -rf security/wpa_supplicant
>> $ git checkout origin/main security/wpa_supplicant
>> $ git commit -m '[local] secu
On Thu, 14 Sep 2023 00:10:58 +0200
Jan Beich wrote:
> Martin Neubauer writes:
>
> > On Wed, 13 Sep 2023, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> >
> >> El día miércoles, septiembre 13, 2023 a las 12:55:20 +0200, Kurt Jaeger
> >> escribió:
> >>
> >>> Hi!
> >>>
> In short: Is there no way with git to pull
El día miércoles, septiembre 13, 2023 a las 11:40:57 +0200, Jan Beich escribió:
> There are but not officially[1] supported by ports/ e.g.,
>
> $ rm -rf security/wpa_supplicant
> $ git checkout origin/main security/wpa_supplicant
> $ git commit -m '[local] security/wpa_supplicant: sync with "main
Hello.
I think this is a very difficult problem for people like me who are just
maintainers and do not have the right to commit.
How are you all solving this? :)
I have 3 clone repositories.
1. shallow clone created automatically by root using poudriere ports -c -m
git+https.
2. full clone crea
Martin Neubauer writes:
> On Wed, 13 Sep 2023, Matthias Apitz wrote:
>
>> El día miércoles, septiembre 13, 2023 a las 12:55:20 +0200, Kurt Jaeger
>> escribió:
>>
>>> Hi!
>>>
In short: Is there no way with git to pull only one special port
for a recompilation?
>>>
>>> For things like th
Matthias Apitz writes:
> I wrote yesterday:
>
>> El día martes, septiembre 12, 2023 a las 05:42:45p. m. +0200, Christoph
>> Moench-Tegeder escribió:
>>
>> > ## Matthias Apitz (g...@unixarea.de):
>> >
>> > > but when I now say 'git pull .' it says only:
>> >
>> > Drop the ".", because:
>> > 1.
On Wed, 13 Sep 2023, Matthias Apitz wrote:
El día miércoles, septiembre 13, 2023 a las 12:55:20 +0200, Kurt Jaeger
escribió:
Hi!
In short: Is there no way with git to pull only one special port
for a recompilation?
For things like that I always have a git ports tree besides the
poudriere
El día miércoles, septiembre 13, 2023 a las 12:55:20 +0200, Kurt Jaeger
escribió:
> Hi!
>
> > In short: Is there no way with git to pull only one special port
> > for a recompilation?
>
> For things like that I always have a git ports tree besides the
> poudriere ports tree. If I need one littl
Hi!
> In short: Is there no way with git to pull only one special port
> for a recompilation?
For things like that I always have a git ports tree besides the
poudriere ports tree. If I need one little recompile, I
update the non-poudriere tree, take the one change from that tree
that I need, put
I wrote yesterday:
> El día martes, septiembre 12, 2023 a las 05:42:45p. m. +0200, Christoph
> Moench-Tegeder escribió:
>
> > ## Matthias Apitz (g...@unixarea.de):
> >
> > > but when I now say 'git pull .' it says only:
> >
> > Drop the ".", because:
> > 1. the first non-option to "git pull"
El día martes, septiembre 12, 2023 a las 05:42:45p. m. +0200, Christoph
Moench-Tegeder escribió:
> ## Matthias Apitz (g...@unixarea.de):
>
> > but when I now say 'git pull .' it says only:
>
> Drop the ".", because:
> 1. the first non-option to "git pull" is the repository, so you're
>pulli
## Matthias Apitz (g...@unixarea.de):
> but when I now say 'git pull .' it says only:
Drop the ".", because:
1. the first non-option to "git pull" is the repository, so you're
pulling from the current directory, which makes no sense for your
case.
2. git updates the whole repository, which
Hello,
I cloned on August 5 the ports with:
# git clone https://git.FreeBSD.org/ports.git /usr/ports
and compiled with poudriere what I do need, around 2100 ports.
I'm awaiting for a filed PR an update in security/wpa_supplicant
ls -l security/wpa_supplicant
total 24
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel
13 matches
Mail list logo
