Re: poudriere and MAX_EXECUTION_TIME_PACKAGE vs. NOHANG_TIME

2022-01-26 Thread Mark Millard
On 2022-Jan-24, at 23:14, Mark Millard wrote: > [Just a resend with a corrected email address.] > > On 2022-Jan-24, at 22:05, Mark Millard wrote: > > I've been experimenting with WITH_DEBUG= port builds via > poudriere-devel --including some testing of bulk -a . > > For something like devel/l

Re: poudriere and MAX_EXECUTION_TIME_PACKAGE vs. NOHANG_TIME

2022-01-24 Thread Mark Millard
[Just a resend with a corrected email address.] On 2022-Jan-24, at 22:05, Mark Millard wrote: I've been experimenting with WITH_DEBUG= port builds via poudriere-devel --including some testing of bulk -a . For something like devel/llvm13 the .pkg file generated is huge (multi-GiBytes) and takes

poudriere and MAX_EXECUTION_TIME_PACKAGE vs. NOHANG_TIME

2022-01-24 Thread Mark Millard
I've been experimenting with WITH_DEBUG= port builds via poudriere-devel --including some testing of bulk -a . For something like devel/llvm13 the .pkg file generated is huge (multi-GiBytes) and takes more time to produce than the rest of the llvm13 build did. This is with that being the only acti