Mark Millard wrote:
On Nov 14, 2024, at 19:30, Tatsuki Makino wrote:
Since option PORT_LLVM is not turned on in the official version, it seems that
there is no problem with using of the bundle llvm.
However, if we want to use llvm instead of a bundle on an architecture where
the compiler cau
On Nov 14, 2024, at 19:30, Tatsuki Makino wrote:
> Since option PORT_LLVM is not turned on in the official version, it seems
> that there is no problem with using of the bundle llvm.
> However, if we want to use llvm instead of a bundle on an architecture where
> the compiler causes problems, t
Hello.
Since option PORT_LLVM is not turned on in the official version, it seems that
there is no problem with using of the bundle llvm.
However, if we want to use llvm instead of a bundle on an architecture where
the compiler causes problems, that version is no longer supported and we need
to
[Charlie is correct about LLVM 17 being allowed by 1.82.0 of rust.
I had that wrong.]
On Nov 14, 2024, at 14:26, Mark Millard wrote:
>
> On Nov 14, 2024, at 13:21, Charlie Li wrote:
>
>> Mark Millard wrote:
>>> https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/130487 reports . . .
>>> QUOTE
>>> Update th
