(...)
A good example:
"x11-wm/nscde: fix packaging when uname -m != uname -p"
https://cgit.freebsd.org/ports/commit/?id=4ae82fd2ee2059cd9ee0ec99bd6fd8062cd5dbdd
Nuno Teixeira escreveu no dia sexta, 30/12/2022 à(s)
08:22:
> Hello Tatsuki!
>
> I't seems that you dig it into source configs, I will
Hello Tatsuki!
I't seems that you dig it into source configs, I will take a look into this
too.
I was talking using ARCH (and OSREL, OSVERSION, etc) in a more generic way
and only related to ports framework to easier some tasks like dinamic plist
for some files that change with this vars:
---
PL
Tatsuki Makino wrote on 2022/12/30 06:17:
> For x11-wm/nscde, this is present in ${WRCSRC}/configure.ac.
>
> OS_PLUS_MACHINE_ARCH=`uname -sm | tr ' ' '_'`
> AC_SUBST(OS_PLUS_MACHINE_ARCH)
>
Then, in the case of security/zeek, it seems that uname -m is used in
zeek-5.0.4/cmake/GetArchitecture.cm
Hello.
Nuno Teixeira wrote on 2022/12/30 02:41:
> I'm looking for the best way to use `uname -m` on plist_sub:
> ---
> UNAME_M_CMD=${UNAME} -m
> PLIST_SUB+= ARCH="$$(${UNAME_M_CMD})"
> ---
> but I'm not sure sure about -m and -p differences and effects on
> arm64/aarch64.
>
> It would be
Hello all,
I'm looking for the best way to use `uname -m` on plist_sub:
---
UNAME_M_CMD=${UNAME} -m
PLIST_SUB+= ARCH="$$(${UNAME_M_CMD})"
---
but I'm not sure sure about -m and -p differences and effects on
arm64/aarch64.
It would be nicer to use:
---
PLIST_SUB+= ARCH=${ARCH}
---
but it u
