Re: Restraining poudriere

2021-06-15 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-arm
On 2021-Jun-12, at 18:35, Mark Millard wrote: > On 2021-Jun-12, at 17:53, Mark Millard wrote: > >> On 2021-Jun-12, at 10:57, bob prohaska wrote: >> >>> On Sat, Jun 12, 2021 at 07:36:48PM +0200, Michael Gmelin wrote: > On 12. Jun 2021, at 19:31, bob prohaska wrote: > >

Re: Restraining poudriere

2021-06-13 Thread Matthias Andree
Am 13.06.21 um 01:16 schrieb bob prohaska: > On Sat, Jun 12, 2021 at 01:26:16PM -0700, Jose Quinteiro wrote: >> On 6/12/21 10:57 AM, bob prohaska wrote: >>> Trying it now, hoping to see parallel core use. >> You won't. Setting PARALLEL_JOBS=1 means exactly one Poudriere worker >> will run, and that

Re: Restraining poudriere

2021-06-12 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-arm
On 2021-Jun-12, at 17:53, Mark Millard wrote: > On 2021-Jun-12, at 10:57, bob prohaska wrote: > >> On Sat, Jun 12, 2021 at 07:36:48PM +0200, Michael Gmelin wrote: >>> >>> On 12. Jun 2021, at 19:31, bob prohaska wrote: ???In playing with poudriere on raspberry pi 3 and 4 it se

Re: Restraining poudriere

2021-06-12 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-arm
On 2021-Jun-12, at 10:57, bob prohaska wrote: > On Sat, Jun 12, 2021 at 07:36:48PM +0200, Michael Gmelin wrote: >> >> >>> On 12. Jun 2021, at 19:31, bob prohaska wrote: >>> >>> ???In playing with poudriere on raspberry pi 3 and 4 it seems to >>> work well on the 8 GB Pi4 but is over-optimisti

Re: Restraining poudriere

2021-06-12 Thread Jose Quinteiro
On 6/12/21 4:16 PM, bob prohaska wrote: > On Sat, Jun 12, 2021 at 01:26:16PM -0700, Jose Quinteiro wrote: >> On 6/12/21 10:57 AM, bob prohaska wrote: >>> >>> Trying it now, hoping to see parallel core use. >> >> You won't. Setting PARALLEL_JOBS=1 means exactly one Poudriere worker >> will run, and

Re: Restraining poudriere

2021-06-12 Thread bob prohaska
On Sat, Jun 12, 2021 at 01:26:16PM -0700, Jose Quinteiro wrote: > On 6/12/21 10:57 AM, bob prohaska wrote: > > > > Trying it now, hoping to see parallel core use. > > You won't. Setting PARALLEL_JOBS=1 means exactly one Poudriere worker > will run, and that make will not build in parallel. You ha

Re: Restraining poudriere

2021-06-12 Thread Jose Quinteiro
On 6/12/21 10:57 AM, bob prohaska wrote: > On Sat, Jun 12, 2021 at 07:36:48PM +0200, Michael Gmelin wrote: >> >> >>> On 12. Jun 2021, at 19:31, bob prohaska wrote: >>> >>> ???In playing with poudriere on raspberry pi 3 and 4 it seems to >>> work well on the 8 GB Pi4 but is over-optimistic on the 1

Re: Restraining poudriere

2021-06-12 Thread Michael Gmelin
> On 12. Jun 2021, at 20:08, bob prohaska wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 12, 2021 at 10:45:13AM -0700, Jose Quinteiro wrote: >>> On 6/12/21 10:29 AM, bob prohaska wrote: >>> In playing with poudriere on raspberry pi 3 and 4 it seems to >>> work well on the 8 GB Pi4 but is over-optimistic on the 1 GB P

Re: Restraining poudriere

2021-06-12 Thread bob prohaska
On Sat, Jun 12, 2021 at 10:45:13AM -0700, Jose Quinteiro wrote: > On 6/12/21 10:29 AM, bob prohaska wrote: > > In playing with poudriere on raspberry pi 3 and 4 it seems to > > work well on the 8 GB Pi4 but is over-optimistic on the 1 GB Pi3. > > > (snip) > You might want to consider modifying you

Re: Restraining poudriere

2021-06-12 Thread bob prohaska
On Sat, Jun 12, 2021 at 07:36:48PM +0200, Michael Gmelin wrote: > > > > On 12. Jun 2021, at 19:31, bob prohaska wrote: > > > > ???In playing with poudriere on raspberry pi 3 and 4 it seems to > > work well on the 8 GB Pi4 but is over-optimistic on the 1 GB Pi3. > > > > Can poudriere be configu

Re: Restraining poudriere

2021-06-12 Thread Jose Quinteiro
On 6/12/21 10:29 AM, bob prohaska wrote: > In playing with poudriere on raspberry pi 3 and 4 it seems to > work well on the 8 GB Pi4 but is over-optimistic on the 1 GB Pi3. > (snip) You might want to consider modifying your USE_TMPFS setting in poudriere.conf if you are constrained by memory. The

Re: Restraining poudriere

2021-06-12 Thread bob prohaska
On Sat, Jun 12, 2021 at 07:34:22PM +0200, Matthias Andree wrote: > Am 12.06.21 um 19:29 schrieb bob prohaska: > > In playing with poudriere on raspberry pi 3 and 4 it seems to > > work well on the 8 GB Pi4 but is over-optimistic on the 1 GB Pi3. > > > > Can poudriere be configured to tackle package

Re: Restraining poudriere

2021-06-12 Thread Michael Gmelin
> On 12. Jun 2021, at 19:31, bob prohaska wrote: > > In playing with poudriere on raspberry pi 3 and 4 it seems to > work well on the 8 GB Pi4 but is over-optimistic on the 1 GB Pi3. > > Can poudriere be configured to tackle packages one at a time? Yes, see poudriere.conf: # parallel build

Re: Restraining poudriere

2021-06-12 Thread Matthias Andree
Am 12.06.21 um 19:29 schrieb bob prohaska: > In playing with poudriere on raspberry pi 3 and 4 it seems to > work well on the 8 GB Pi4 but is over-optimistic on the 1 GB Pi3. > > Can poudriere be configured to tackle packages one at a time? Sure, the easiest to try is poudriere bulk -J1 ... (capit