Re: Default optimization of rust ports

2022-09-16 Thread Daniel Engberg
On 2022-09-16 19:42, Mark Millard wrote: Mark Millard escreveu no dia sábado, 10/09/2022 à(s) 12:53: Daniel Engberg wrote on Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2022 09:45:21 UTC : Since there is work and general interest regarding optimization would it make sense to make LTO and possibly CODEGEN_UNITS=1 op

Re: Default optimization of rust ports

2022-09-16 Thread Mark Millard
> Mark Millard escreveu no dia sábado, 10/09/2022 > à(s) 12:53: > >> Daniel Engberg wrote on >> Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2022 09:45:21 UTC : >> >>> Since there is work and general interest regarding optimization would >>> it >>> make sense to make LTO and possibly CODEGEN_UNITS=1 opt-out while we >>

Re: Default optimization of rust ports

2022-09-16 Thread Daniel Engberg
On 2022-09-13 11:54, Nuno Teixeira wrote: Hi, I think this issue is related to what happened in terms of optimizations in go 1.18.3_1: --- Add amd64 microarchitecture level knobs for the Go compiler. Note that this will affect only the compiler itself, port users will still need to set GO

Re: Default optimization of rust ports

2022-09-13 Thread Nuno Teixeira
Hi, I think this issue is related to what happened in terms of optimizations in go 1.18.3_1: --- Add amd64 microarchitecture level knobs for the Go compiler. Note that this will affect only the compiler itself, port users will still need to set GOAMD64 in the environment to adjust the microarchite

RE: Default optimization of rust ports

2022-09-10 Thread Mark Millard
Daniel Engberg wrote on Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2022 09:45:21 UTC : > Since there is work and general interest regarding optimization would it > make sense to make LTO and possibly CODEGEN_UNITS=1 opt-out while we > still have a fairly manageable amount of ports using Rust? Just making sure I under